Literature DB >> 27838647

Liquoral liquid biopsy in neoplastic meningitis enables molecular diagnosis and mutation tracking: a proof of concept.

Caterina Marchiò1,2, Sara Mariani1,2, Luca Bertero1, Cristiana Di Bello2, Paola Francia Di Celle2, Mauro Papotti2,3, Roberta Rudà4, Riccardo Soffietti4,5, Paola Cassoni1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-free DNA; cerebrospinal fluid; liquid biopsy; metastasis; neoplastic meningitis; plasma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27838647      PMCID: PMC5464358          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


× No keyword cloud information.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a potential source of tumor-derived DNA in patients with primary or secondary CNS tumors. Selected mutations in CSF circulating tumoral cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been identified by PCR detection techniques, and more recently panels of genes have been assessed by targeted next-generation sequencing.[1],[2] As a matter of fact, different clinically validated platforms for mutational analysis with distinct analytical sensitivities are currently available in routine diagnostic practice. In our study we tracked the mutational repertoire in 2 cases of leptomeningeal metastatic disease in synchronous samples of circulating cfDNA derived from plasma and CSF using the mass spectrometry technology Sequenom MassARRAY and fast COLD-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. In Case 1, a 58-year-old male presenting with progressive hearing loss was diagnosed with a multifocal moderately differentiated lung adenocarcinoma with a right temporal brain metastatic lesion. Following metastasis resection and whole-brain radiation therapy, pulmonary lobectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Before further treatments the patient developed neoplastic meningitis with nodular lumbar enhancement on MRI without recurrence at the previous supratentorial metastatic site. CSF and plasma samples were obtained from the patient, and intrathecal chemotherapy with liposomal cytarabine was started. In the following weeks the patient’s performance status quickly deteriorated and death occurred 7 months after the initial diagnosis. The patient in Case 2 was a 64-year-old female who presented with headache, vertigo, and drowsiness. CT and MRI demonstrated a right hemispheric cerebellar contrast-enhancing lesion diagnosed after resection as a lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. Staging assessments identified a lung neoplasm in the superior left lobe associated with mediastinal lymphadenopathies. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pulmonary lobectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed, thus confirming a poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma. After 6 months, multiple cerebellar metastases developed and were treated with radiotherapy, obtaining a partial response. Three months later, symptoms suggestive for neoplastic meningitis were confirmed by MRI (infratentorial leptomeningeal nodules). Intrathecal chemotherapy with liposomal cytarabine was started; however, due to poor patient performance this treatment was stopped in favor of palliative care. In both cases, DNA was extracted from the tumor resection specimen and from synchronous samples of plasma obtained from peripheral blood and of CSF obtained from a lumbar puncture performed before starting intrathecal chemotherapy. First, we carried out Sequenom using the Lung Status kit, which identifies the main nucleotide substitutions affecting EGFR and KRAS in lung adenocarcinoma and explores mutations at multiple codons of other relevant genes. The primary tumors of Case 1 and Case 2 harbored a p.G13C (c.37G>T, Fig. 1A) and a p.G12F (c.34_35delGGinsTT, Supplementary Fig. 1A) KRAS mutation, respectively. These KRAS mutations were absent in plasma but detectable in CSF cfDNA (0.02% vs 66.4% for Case 1, Fig. 1B–C; 0.02% vs 45% for Case 2, Supplementary Fig. 1B–C).
Fig. 1

Detection of DNA alterations in the tumor tissue and in liquid biopsies of Case 1. The KRAS mutation c.37G>T, pG13C was diagnosed by Sequenom (Myriapod Lung Cancer kit, Diatech Pharmacogenetics) in the tumor resection sample (A); the estimated mutant allele frequency was 30% (arrow), suggesting a homozygous KRAS mutation, since the tumor cell content in the selected tumor area accounted for about 30%. The same driver mutation was not detected in plasma cfDNA samples (B), but was identified in CSF (C). The mutant allele frequency of >50% found in the CSF sample (arrow) suggested a likely homozygous pattern, in a way akin to the primary tumor. The highly sensitive fast COLD-PCR assay detected the same mutation in the tissue sample (D), confirming also the negativity of plasma (E) and positivity of CSF (F), using DNA input comprised in the range of absolute assay reproducibility.[3]

Detection of DNA alterations in the tumor tissue and in liquid biopsies of Case 1. The KRAS mutation c.37G>T, pG13C was diagnosed by Sequenom (Myriapod Lung Cancer kit, Diatech Pharmacogenetics) in the tumor resection sample (A); the estimated mutant allele frequency was 30% (arrow), suggesting a homozygous KRAS mutation, since the tumor cell content in the selected tumor area accounted for about 30%. The same driver mutation was not detected in plasma cfDNA samples (B), but was identified in CSF (C). The mutant allele frequency of >50% found in the CSF sample (arrow) suggested a likely homozygous pattern, in a way akin to the primary tumor. The highly sensitive fast COLD-PCR assay detected the same mutation in the tissue sample (D), confirming also the negativity of plasma (E) and positivity of CSF (F), using DNA input comprised in the range of absolute assay reproducibility.[3] To explore the G>A or G>T KRAS mutations at codons 12/13 with higher analytical sensitivity than Sequenom, we then assessed all samples by fast COLD-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. The DNA quantities were all comprised in a range of absolute reproducibility to detect a heterozygous mutation.[3] The p.G13C as well as the p.G12F KRAS mutations identified by Sequenom were detected by fast COLD-PCR in tissue and in CSF-derived DNA (Fig. 1D, F; Supplementary Fig. 1D, 1F), while no KRAS mutations were identified in plasma (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. 1E). Finally, we measured the extent of DNA fragmentation by calculating a ratio between the concentrations of 247/115 bp real-time PCR-amplified products, suggestive of apoptosis or necrosis for ratios tending to 1 or 0, respectively.[4] The ratios observed in plasma and CSF samples (51% vs 35% for Case 1 and 100% for both in Case 2) indicate a heterogeneous degree of apoptosis in the samples, confirming there is no consensus on the origin of the cfDNA (necrosis vs apoptosis).[5],[6] One may argue that we could not detect the KRAS mutation in plasma cfDNA due to the analytical sensitivity of our sequencing platform. For KRAS mutations the limit of detection estimated for Sequenom is near 5%, provided that a DNA input not below 1 ng is available. Notably, only the DNA inputs from CSF were below the cutoff (0.8 ng for Case 1 and 0.022 ng for Case 2), nevertheless we detected the mutation in these samples with a mutant allele frequency much higher than the sensitivity cutoff of 5% (ie, 66% for Case 1 and 45% for Case 2). Most importantly, no KRAS mutations were identified in plasma cfDNA even when analyzed with a 50-fold more sensitive detection method (fast COLD-PCR). Our results provide another line of evidence that cfDNA derived from metastatic deposits in the brain with clinical features of meningeal carcinomatosis is more abundant in CSF compared with plasma. This is a phenomenon likely mediated by the intimate contact of CSF with tumor cells and by the compartmentalization of CSF from plasma due to the blood–brain barrier. Although accrued only in 2 patients, our data are the first to suggest that the relative enrichment of CSF in tumoral cfDNA compared with plasma can reliably allow for comprehensive sequencing of a panel of genes by Sequenom MassARRAY in a way akin to targeted panels of massively parallel sequencing. In addition, a second-level analysis of specific KRAS mutations by fast COLD-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing can be employed to guarantee a higher enrichment of specific mutant alleles with G>T or G>A substitutions. Taken together, these results corroborate the notion that CSF likely represents a preferable source of representative liquid biopsy in brain metastatic lesions featuring meningeal carcinomatosis, at least when no extra-CNS localizations are evident. Liquoral liquid biopsies can help monitor changes in metastatic deposits in the CNS and may complement the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis.[2] Although a lumbar puncture is a more invasive procedure than a blood draw, the possible lack of representative tumoral cfDNA in the plasma may delay molecular diagnosis or lead to nonconclusive results in this delicate subset of patients. Otherwise, liquoral liquid biopsy can allow the identification of either actionable genetic alterations or a mutation correlated to resistance to targeted therapies leading to crucial changes in the treatment decision making. In both of the presented cases the detected mutations were not strictly propaedeutic to tailor patient treatment (ie, not actionable); however, in lung cancer patients KRAS mutations have been (i) repeatedly implicated as markers of poor prognosis[7],[8] and (ii) shown to significantly correlate with brain metastatic disease.[9] Finally, since preclinical evidence suggests the existence of at least 2 subgroups of mutant KRAS lung tumors with distinct genetic/metabolic signatures and unique therapeutic susceptibilities assessable on the basis of their relative mutant allelic content,[10] combined quantitative and qualitative KRAS locus assessment may hold both prognostic and therapeutic usefulness.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available online at Neuro-Oncology (http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/).

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Association of Cancer Research (AIRC, MFAG13310 to C.M.), the Ministry of University (ex 60% and 2015HAJH8E to C.M. and ex-60% P.C.) and Rete Oncologica Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta (to P.C.). Conflict of interest statement: None to declare. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

1.  Assessment of circulating serum DNA integrity in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ebru E Yörüker; Emre Özgür; Metin Keskin; Nejat Dalay; Stefan Holdenrieder; Ugur Gezer
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Deep Sequencing Analysis Reveals That KRAS Mutation Is a Marker of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Filippo Lococo; Greta Gandolfi; Giulio Rossi; Carmine Pinto; Cristian Rapicetta; Alberto Cavazza; Alfredo Cesario; Carla Galeone; Massimiliano Paci; Alessia Ciarrocchi
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Prediction of breast tumor progression by integrity of free circulating DNA in serum.

Authors:  Naoyuki Umetani; Armando E Giuliano; Suzanne H Hiramatsu; Farin Amersi; Taku Nakagawa; Silvana Martino; Dave S B Hoon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Alterations of LKB1 and KRAS and risk of brain metastasis: comprehensive characterization by mutation analysis, copy number, and gene expression in non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Ni Zhao; Matthew D Wilkerson; Usman Shah; Xiaoying Yin; Anyou Wang; Michele C Hayward; Patrick Roberts; Carrie B Lee; Alden M Parsons; Leigh B Thorne; Benjamin E Haithcock; Juneko E Grilley-Olson; Thomas E Stinchcombe; William K Funkhouser; Kwok-Kin Wong; Norman E Sharpless; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Cell-free DNA in human blood plasma: length measurements in patients with pancreatic cancer and healthy controls.

Authors:  M B Giacona; G C Ruben; K A Iczkowski; T B Roos; D M Porter; G D Sorenson
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Flexible lab-tailored cut-offs for suitability of formalin-fixed tumor samples for diagnostic mutational analyses.

Authors:  Sara Mariani; Cristiana Di Bello; Lisa Bonello; Fabrizio Tondat; Donatella Pacchioni; Luca Molinaro; Antonella Barreca; Luigia Macrì; Luigi Chiusa; Paola Francia di Celle; Paola Cassoni; Anna Sapino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating Cancer of the Central Nervous System Through Next-Generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  Elena I Pentsova; Ronak H Shah; Jiabin Tang; Adrienne Boire; Daoqi You; Samuel Briggs; Antonio Omuro; Xuling Lin; Martin Fleisher; Christian Grommes; Katherine S Panageas; Fanli Meng; S Duygu Selcuklu; Shahiba Ogilvie; Natalie Distefano; Larisa Shagabayeva; Marc Rosenblum; Lisa M DeAngelis; Agnes Viale; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Michael F Berger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  KRAS mutation is a weak, but valid predictor for poor prognosis and treatment outcomes in NSCLC: A meta-analysis of 41 studies.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Yan Yang; Hongcheng Zhu; Youcheng Zhang; Rongping Zhou; Xinchen Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  Mutant Kras copy number defines metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic susceptibilities.

Authors:  Emma M Kerr; Edoardo Gaude; Frances K Turrell; Christian Frezza; Carla P Martins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma.

Authors:  Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Regina Mayor; Charlotte K Y Ng; Britta Weigelt; Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Davis Torrejon; Mafalda Oliveira; Alexandra Arias; Carolina Raventos; Jiabin Tang; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Elena Martínez-Sáez; Sergio Lois; Oscar Marín; Xavier de la Cruz; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Russel Towers; Ana Vivancos; Vicente Peg; Santiago Ramon y Cajal; Joan Carles; Jordi Rodon; María González-Cao; Josep Tabernero; Enriqueta Felip; Joan Sahuquillo; Michael F Berger; Javier Cortes; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Joan Seoane
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment for Leptomeningeal Disease in Melanoma.

Authors:  Yolanda Piña; Sirisha Yadugiri; Debra N Yeboa; Sherise D Ferguson; Peter A Forsyth; Isabella C Glitza Oliva
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumors: from diagnosis to personalized treatments.

Authors:  Alessia Pellerino; Luca Bertero; Roberta Rudà; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 3.  Therapy of breast cancer brain metastases: challenges, emerging treatments and perspectives.

Authors:  Nuria Kotecki; Florence Lefranc; Daniel Devriendt; Ahmad Awada
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 4.  Review: Peering through a keyhole: liquid biopsy in primary and metastatic central nervous system tumours.

Authors:  L Bertero; G Siravegna; R Rudà; R Soffietti; A Bardelli; P Cassoni
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 8.090

5.  Liquid biopsy in central nervous system metastases: a RANO review and proposals for clinical applications.

Authors:  Adrienne Boire; Dieta Brandsma; Priscilla K Brastianos; Emilie Le Rhun; Manmeet Ahluwalia; Larry Junck; Michael Glantz; Morris D Groves; Eudocia Q Lee; Nancy Lin; Jeffrey Raizer; Roberta Rudà; Michael Weller; Martin J Van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; Susan Chang; Patrick Y Wen; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid to Guide Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Lori A Ramkissoon; Worthy Pegram; James Haberberger; Natalie Danziger; Glenn Lesser; Roy Strowd; Sonika Dahiya; Thomas J Cummings; Wenya Linda Bi; Malak Abedalthagafi; Pratheesh Sathyan; Kimberly McGregor; Prasanth Reddy; Eric Severson; Erik Williams; Douglas Lin; Claire Edgerly; Richard S P Huang; Amanda Hemmerich; James Creeden; Charlotte Brown; Jeffrey Venstrom; Priti Hegde; Jeffrey S Ross; Brian M Alexander; Julia Elvin; Shakti H Ramkissoon
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.