Literature DB >> 27837383

Exploring measurement invariance by gender in the profile of mood states depression subscale among cancer survivors.

Jihye Kim1, Tenbroeck Smith2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF) is a well-validated tool commonly used in medical/clinical research. Less attention has been paid to the measurement invariance of the POMS-the degree to which the structure and items behave similarly for different groups (e.g., women and men). This study investigated the measurement invariance of the POMS Depression subscale across gender groups in a sample of cancer survivors.
METHODS: The POMS Depression subscale has 8 items (Unhappy, Sad, Blue, Hopeless, Discouraged, Miserable, Helpless, and Worthless). Invariance was measured using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. This study used data from American Cancer Society Studies of Cancer Survivors-II, a population-based survey of adult cancer survivors (n = 9170).
RESULTS: We found factor structures and factor loadings were invariant for gender groups, but moderate differential item functioning (DIF) in the question containing the word blue.
CONCLUSION: With regard to cancer survivors' gender, we found the Depression subscale of the POMS-SF had configural invariance, and partial metric and scalar invariance. This suggests that results should be interpreted with caution, especially when gender is considered important. More broadly, our finding suggests that questions with the word blue may introduce DIF into other measures of depressive mood. More research is needed to replicate these findings in other samples and with other instruments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; Differential item functioning; Measurement invariance; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27837383     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1452-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.

Authors:  Roger E Millsap; Oi-Man Kwok
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-03

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life measurement in oncology: advances and opportunities.

Authors:  David Cella; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar

3.  The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tenbroeck Smith; Kevin D Stein; C Christina Mehta; Chiewkwei Kaw; James L Kepner; Trent Buskirk; Jeremy Stafford; Frank Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Mental disorders in young and middle aged men who commit suicide.

Authors:  E Isometsä; M Henriksson; M Marttunen; M Heikkinen; H Aro; K Kuoppasalmi; J Lönnqvist
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-27

5.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Keith F Widaman; Robin H Pugh
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance.

Authors:  C H Hennessy; D G Moriarty; M M Zack; P A Scherr; R Brackbill
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States.

Authors:  S Shacham
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1983-06

Review 8.  Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline adaptation.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen; Robert J DeRubeis; Barry S Berman; Jessie Gruman; Victoria L Champion; Mary Jane Massie; Jimmie C Holland; Ann H Partridge; Kate Bak; Mark R Somerfield; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Measurement invariance of the depressive symptoms scale during adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer Brunet; Catherine M Sabiston; Michael Chaiton; Nancy C P Low; Gisèle Contreras; Tracie A Barnett; Jennifer L O'Loughlin
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.630

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Differential item functioning and its relevance to epidemiology.

Authors:  Richard N Jones
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2019-05-01

2.  Do You Transfer Your Skills? From Sports to Health Management in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Valeria Sebri; Lucrezia Savioni; Stefano Triberti; Ilaria Durosini; Ketti Mazzocco; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Profile of Mood States Factor Structure Does Not Accurately Account for Patients with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Celia María López-Jiménez; Francisco Javier Cano-García; Susana Sanduvete-Chaves; Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.