Literature DB >> 27837000

Perspectives: answering questions about quality improvement: suggestions for investigators.

John Øvretveit1.   

Abstract

'Does it work?' is not the only question that practical improvers have of those investigating of quality improvements. They also want to know, 'Will it work here? What conditions do we need to implement and sustain it? Can we adapt it? How much will it cost and save? Is there enough evidence to spread it?'This perspectives article describes methods that investigators can use to answer these questions about improvement changes and improvement methods. It suggests that one reason why research is underused by improvers is because there is little research that answers these questions that would enable improvers to decide whether or how to implement an improvement in their local setting. It shows improvers that answers are possible and where improvers might find research and reports which answer these questions. It is based on reviews of research and reports about methods for producing valid and actionable knowledge to answer these questions. It describes a new 'quality improvement investigation movement' which is uniting applied researchers and improvers to use innovative methods to answer these questions. These investigators recognize the strengths of the randomized controlled trail method, and how easy it is to draw the wrong conclusions from data generated using lower cost and more timely methods. It emphasizes how investigators can choose a method suited to each question, describe the limitations of the method and communicate to improvers the degree of certainty of their answers to the questions.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  evaluation; quality improvement; research methods; translational research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27837000     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  3 in total

1.  Moving beyond hand hygiene monitoring as a marker of infection prevention performance: Development of a tailored infection control continuous quality improvement tool.

Authors:  Annette Jeanes; Pietro G Coen; Nicolas S Drey; Dinah J Gould
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Digital Technologies Supporting Person-Centered Integrated Care - A Perspective.

Authors:  John Øvretveit
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  A typology of useful evidence: approaches to increase the practical value of intervention research.

Authors:  Henna Hasson; Laura Leviton; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.