Literature DB >> 27836829

One-year outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% versus 100% air for anterior chamber tamponade.

Friederike Schaub1, Philip Enders1, Katharina Snijders1, Silvia Schrittenlocher1, Sebastian Siebelmann1, Ludwig M Heindl1, Björn O Bachmann1, Claus Cursiefen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate 1-year clinical outcome and complication rates following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with sulfur hexafluoride 20% (SF620%) anterior chamber tamponade compared with conventionally used 100% air for primary graft attachment during DMEK surgery.
METHODS: Records of 1112 consecutive DMEKs were reviewed retrospectively and grouped by anterior chamber tamponade used during DMEK surgery (SF620% vs 100% air). Outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD) and central corneal thickness (CCT) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after DMEK surgery. Complication rates were assessed, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, and graft detachment rate requiring rebubbling.
RESULTS: A total of 854 cases were included in this study. In 105 cases (12.3%), DMEK was performed with SF620%, and in 749 cases (87.7%) 100% air was used for anterior chamber tamponade. Outcome results for IOP, BSCVA, ECD and CCT at all follow-up time points were comparable for both anterior chamber tamponade groups without statistical significant differences (p≥0.05), but graft detachment rate requiring rebubbling was significantly lower in the SF620% group (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Whereas SF620% anterior chamber tamponade does not seem to negatively affect the clinical outcome of DMEK surgery within the first postoperative year, use of SF620% significantly reduces the rate of rebubblings. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Dystrophy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836829     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  13 in total

1.  "PI-less DMEK": results of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy.

Authors:  Eitan Livny; Irit Bahar; Issac Levy; Michael Mimouni; Yoav Nahum
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [Critical endothelial procedures during posterior lamellar graft preparation and transplantation].

Authors:  T A Fuchsluger; F E Kruse; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

Authors:  M Matthaei; S Schrittenlocher; D Hos; S Siebelmann; F Bucher; F Schaub; R Hoerster; R Siggel; S Roters; L M Heindl; B Bachmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Technique of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) : Video article].

Authors:  M Matthaei; B Bachmann; S Siebelmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Impact of corneal donor lens status on two-year course and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Friederike Schaub; Layla Pohl; Philip Enders; Werner Adler; Björn O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Postoperative pain following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): a prospective study.

Authors:  Johannes Loeser; Julian Schwemmer; Antoniu-Oreste Gostian; Magdalena Gostian; Björn Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

8.  Outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Bishr Agha; Mehdi Shajari; Anna Slavik-Lencova; Thomas Kohnen; Ingo Schmack
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-25

9.  Clinical Outcomes Of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using The Bonfadini-Todd Injector For Graft Insertion.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Ighani; Sezen Karakus; Allen O Eghrari
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-20

10.  Successful Treatment of Post-Phacoemulsification Descemet's Membrane Detachment Assessed by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ayaka Doi; Tadamichi Akagi; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.