Traci Schwinn1, Jessica Hopkins2, Steven P Schinke2, Xiang Liu3. 1. Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, United States. Electronic address: tms40@columbia.edu. 2. Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, United States. 3. Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 W. 120th St., New York, NY 10027, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials require sufficient samples recruited within limited time and budget constraints. Trials with minors are additionally burdened by the requirement for youth assent and parental permission. This paper details the use of Facebook ads and traditional paper mailings to enroll 797 adolescent girls for a longitudinal, web-based, drug abuse prevention trial. Data on sample representativeness and retention are also provided. METHODS: Facebook ads appeared on the pages of females aged 13 or 14years who reside in the U.S. Ads linked girls to a recruitment website. Girls who wanted more information submitted contact information and were mailed information packets to their homes containing, among other things, youth assent and parent permission forms. Returned forms were verified for accuracy and validity. RESULTS: The Facebook ad campaign reached 2,267,848 girls and had a unique click-through rate of 3.0%. The campaign cost $41,202.37 with an average cost of $51.70 per enrolled girl. Information packets were mailed to 1,873 girls. Approximately one-half of girls returned the forms, and 797 girls were enrolled. The Facebook campaign's success varied by ad type, month, and day of the week. Baseline data revealed comparability to national data on demographic and substance use variables. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that Facebook ads provide a useful initial point of access to unparalleled numbers of adolescents. Clinical trials may benefit from a two-fold recruitment strategy that uses online ads to attract interested adolescents followed by traditional recruitment methods to communicate detailed information to adolescents and parents. Copyright Â
INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials require sufficient samples recruited within limited time and budget constraints. Trials with minors are additionally burdened by the requirement for youth assent and parental permission. This paper details the use of Facebook ads and traditional paper mailings to enroll 797 adolescent girls for a longitudinal, web-based, drug abuse prevention trial. Data on sample representativeness and retention are also provided. METHODS: Facebook ads appeared on the pages of females aged 13 or 14years who reside in the U.S. Ads linked girls to a recruitment website. Girls who wanted more information submitted contact information and were mailed information packets to their homes containing, among other things, youth assent and parent permission forms. Returned forms were verified for accuracy and validity. RESULTS: The Facebook ad campaign reached 2,267,848 girls and had a unique click-through rate of 3.0%. The campaign cost $41,202.37 with an average cost of $51.70 per enrolled girl. Information packets were mailed to 1,873 girls. Approximately one-half of girls returned the forms, and 797 girls were enrolled. The Facebook campaign's success varied by ad type, month, and day of the week. Baseline data revealed comparability to national data on demographic and substance use variables. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that Facebook ads provide a useful initial point of access to unparalleled numbers of adolescents. Clinical trials may benefit from a two-fold recruitment strategy that uses online ads to attract interested adolescents followed by traditional recruitment methods to communicate detailed information to adolescents and parents. Copyright Â
Authors: Yeshe Fenner; Suzanne M Garland; Elya E Moore; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Ashley Fletcher; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Bharathy Gunasekaran; John D Wark Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Deborah Loxton; Jennifer Powers; Amy E Anderson; Natalie Townsend; Melissa L Harris; Ryan Tuckerman; Stephanie Pease; Gita Mishra; Julie Byles Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Louise A Ellis; Philippa Collin; Tracey A Davenport; Patrick J Hurley; Jane M Burns; Ian B Hickie Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Paolo Bajardi; Daniela Paolotti; Alessandro Vespignani; Ken Eames; Sebastian Funk; W John Edmunds; Clement Turbelin; Marion Debin; Vittoria Colizza; Ronald Smallenburg; Carl Koppeschaar; Ana O Franco; Vitor Faustino; AnnaSara Carnahan; Moa Rehn; Franco Merletti; Jeroen Douwes; Ridvan Firestone; Lorenzo Richiardi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Catherine Sanchez; Adrienne Grzenda; Andrea Varias; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter; William M McDonald; Charles B Nemeroff; Ned H Kalin; Glenn Martin; Mauricio Tohen; Maria Filippou-Frye; Drew Ramsey; Eleni Linos; Christina Mangurian; Carolyn I Rodriguez Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Mette Brøgger-Mikkelsen; Zarqa Ali; John R Zibert; Anders Daniel Andersen; Simon Francis Thomsen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Charline Bour; Adrian Ahne; Susanne Schmitz; Camille Perchoux; Coralie Dessenne; Guy Fagherazzi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 5.428