Literature DB >> 27834419

Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration.

Nikolaos K Soldatos, Popi Stylianou, Vasiliki P Koidou, Nikola Angelov, Raymond Yukna, Georgios E Romanos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Deficient bony ridges often complicate the implant treatment plan. Several treatment modalities are used to regenerate bone, including guided bone regeneration (GBR). The purpose of this study was to summarize the knowledge on different types of membranes available and currently used in GBR procedures in a staged approach or with simultaneous implant placement. The primary role of the membranes is to exclude epithelial and connective tissue cells from the wound area to be regenerated, and to create and maintain the space into which pluripotential and osteogenic cells are free to migrate. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed for articles that were published in English on the topic. A selected number of studies were chosen in order to provide a review of the main characteristics, applications, and outcomes of the different types of membranes. Resorbable membranes are made of natural or synthetic polymers like collagen and aliphatic polyesters. Collagens are the most common type used. They have similar collagen composition to the periodontal connective tissue. Other materials available include human, porcine, and bovine pericardium membranes, human amnion and chorion tissue, and human acellular freeze-dried dermal matrix. Nonresorbable membranes used in GBR include dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE), expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE), titanium mesh, and titanium-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common complication of nonresorbable membranes is exposure, which has detrimental effect on the final outcome with both types of membranes. For vertical bone augmentation procedures, the most appropriate membranes are the nonresorbable. For combination defects, both types result in a successful outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27834419     DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a37133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of Macro-and Micro-porosity of a Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration: An In Vivo Experimental Study.

Authors:  Motoki Senoo; Akira Hasuike; Takanobu Yamamoto; Yasumasa Ozawa; Norihisa Watanabe; Mitsuaki Furuhata; Shuichi Sato
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Mimicked Periosteum Layer Based on Deposited Particle Silk Fibroin Membrane for Osteogenesis and Guided Bone Regeneration in Alveolar Cleft Surgery: Formation and in Vitro Testing.

Authors:  Yadanar Mya Moe; Thongchai Nuntanaranont; Matthana Khangkhamano; Jirut Meesane
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  The fabrication of an ICA-SF/PLCL nanofibrous membrane by coaxial electrospinning and its effect on bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lihua Yin; Kaijuan Wang; Xiaoqin Lv; Rui Sun; Shaohua Yang; Yujie Yang; Yanyun Liu; Jiatao Liu; Jing Zhou; Zhanhai Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Case Report: Managing the postoperative exposure of a non-resorbable membrane surgically.

Authors:  Abdullah S Almutairi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-05-31

Review 5.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

6.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tadas Korzinskas; Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Kristina Glenske; Michael Hahn; Sabine Wenisch; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Microporous elastomeric membranes fabricated with polyglycerol sebacate improved guided bone regeneration in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Bo Jian; Wei Wu; Yingliang Song; Naiwen Tan; Chao Ma
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-04-15

8.  Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative periodontal surgery with enamel matrix derivatives or guided tissue regeneration: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Rojas; L Marini; A Pilloni; P Sahrmann
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 9.  Ridge Preservation Procedures after Tooth Extractions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gabriella Balli; Andreas Ioannou; Charles A Powell; Nikola Angelov; Georgios E Romanos; Nikolaos Soldatos
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-07-03

10.  A Preshaped Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft in a Posterior Mandibular Bone Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gianbattista Greco; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.