Literature DB >> 27834282

The Use of Technology for Estimating Body CompositionStrengths and Weaknesses of Common Modalities in a Clinical Setting [Formula: see text].

Levi M Teigen1, Adam J Kuchnia1, Marina Mourtzakis2, Carrie P Earthman1.   

Abstract

Assessment of body composition, both at single time points and longitudinally, is particularly important in clinical nutrition practice. It provides a means for the clinician to characterize nutrition status at a single time point, aiding in the identification and diagnosis of malnutrition, and to monitor changes over time by providing real-time information on the adequacy of nutrition interventions. Objective body composition measurement tools are available clinically but are often underused in nutrition care, particularly in the United States. This is, in part, due to a number of factors concerning their use in a clinical context: cost and accessibility of equipment, as well as interpretability of the results. This article focuses on the factors influencing interpretation of results in a clinical setting. Body composition assessment, regardless of the method, is inherently limited by its indirect nature. Therefore, an understanding of the strengths and limitations of any method is essential for meaningful interpretation of its results. This review provides an overview of body composition technologies available clinically (computed tomography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioimpedance, ultrasound) and discusses the strengths and limitations of each device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioimpedance; body composition; computed tomography; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; lean tissue; malnutrition; nutrition assessment; nutritional status; skeletal muscle; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27834282     DOI: 10.1177/0884533616676264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract        ISSN: 0884-5336            Impact factor:   3.080


  15 in total

Review 1.  Body Composition Methods in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes or at Risk for T2D: a Clinical Review.

Authors:  Nadia Markie Sneed; Shannon A Morrison
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Is it time to update body mass index standards in the elderly or embrace measurements of body composition?

Authors:  L Ben-Yacov; P Ainembabazi; A H Stark
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Dennis T Villareal
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Body Composition in Children with Chronic Illness: Accuracy of Bedside Assessment Techniques.

Authors:  Enid E Martinez; Craig D Smallwood; Nicolle L Quinn; Katelyn Ariagno; Lori J Bechard; Christopher P Duggan; Nilesh M Mehta
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Skeletal Muscle Ultrasound in Critical Care: A Tool in Need of Translation.

Authors:  Marina Mourtzakis; Selina Parry; Bronwen Connolly; Zudin Puthucheary
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-10

6.  Comparison between handheld ultrasound and regional and whole-body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for body fat assessment.

Authors:  Sandra L Gomez-Perez; Yanyu Zhang; Marina Mourtzakis; Lisa Tussing-Humphreys; Jason Ridlon; H Rex Gaskins; Ece Mutlu
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2021-10-12

7.  Official Position of the Brazilian Association of Bone Assessment and Metabolism (ABRASSO) on the evaluation of body composition by densitometry-part II (clinical aspects): interpretation, reporting, and special situations.

Authors:  Sergio Setsuo Maeda; Ben-Hur Albergaria; Vera Lúcia Szejnfeld; Marise Lazaretti-Castro; Henrique Pierotti Arantes; Marcela Ushida; Diogo Souza Domiciano; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Rosângela Villa Marin-Mio; Mônica Longo de Oliveira; Laura Maria Carvalho de Mendonça; Mirley do Prado; Guilherme Cardenaz de Souza; Cecília Zanin Palchetti; Roseli Oselka Saccardo Sarni; Maria Teresa Terreri; Luiz Claudio Gonçalves de Castro; Silvana Martinez Baraldi Artoni; Lizandra Amoroso; Débora Emy Karcher; Carla M Prado; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro
Journal:  Adv Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Validity of multi-frequency bioelectric impedance methods to measure body composition in obese patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Louise Becroft; Geraldine Ooi; Adrienne Forsyth; Susannah King; Audrey Tierney
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  The Comparative Associations of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Estimates of Muscle Quality with Physical Performance and Metabolic Parameters in Older Men.

Authors:  Michael O Harris-Love; Nilo A Avila; Bernadette Adams; June Zhou; Bryant Seamon; Catheeja Ismail; Syed H Zaidi; Courtney A Kassner; Frank Liu; Marc R Blackman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Waist-to-height ratio is a better discriminator of cardiovascular disease than other anthropometric indicators in Kurdish adults.

Authors:  Yahya Pasdar; Shima Moradi; Jalal Moludi; Somaiyeh Saiedi; Mehdi Moradinazar; Behrooz Hamzeh; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Farid Najafi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.