Literature DB >> 21183628

Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: triceps surae.

A J Bergquist1, J M Clair, D F Collins.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be delivered over a nerve trunk or muscle belly and can generate contractions by activating motor (peripheral pathway) and sensory (central pathway) axons. In the present experiments, we compared the peripheral and central contributions to plantar flexion contractions evoked by stimulation over the tibial nerve vs. the triceps surae muscles. Generating contractions through central pathways follows Henneman's size principle, whereby low-threshold motor units are activated first, and this may have advantages for rehabilitation. Statistical analyses were performed on data from trials in which NMES was delivered to evoke 10-30% maximum voluntary torque 2-3 s into the stimulation (Time(1)). Two patterns of stimulation were delivered: 1) 20 Hz for 8 s; and 2) 20-100-20 Hz for 3-2-3 s. Torque and soleus electromyography were quantified at the beginning (Time(1)) and end (Time(2); 6-7 s into the stimulation) of each stimulation train. H reflexes (central pathway) and M waves (peripheral pathway) were quantified. Motor unit activity that was not time-locked to each stimulation pulse as an M wave or H reflex ("asynchronous" activity) was also quantified as a second measure of central recruitment. Torque was not different for stimulation over the nerve or the muscle. In contrast, M waves were approximately five to six times smaller, and H reflexes were approximately two to three times larger during NMES over the nerve vs. the muscle. Asynchronous activity increased by 50% over time, regardless of the stimulation location or pattern, and was largest during NMES over the muscle belly. Compared with NMES over the triceps surae muscles, NMES over the tibial nerve produced contractions with a relatively greater central contribution, and this may help reduce muscle atrophy and fatigue when NMES is used for rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21183628     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01103.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  26 in total

1.  The effects of wide pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion torque in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  J M Clair-Auger; D F Collins; J P A Dewald
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Models of passive and active dendrite motoneuron pools and their differences in muscle force control.

Authors:  Leonardo Abdala Elias; Vitor Martins Chaud; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity over the tibial nerve trunk on triceps surae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Aude-Clémence M Doix; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Karin Roeleveld; Serge S Colson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning.

Authors:  Alberto Botter; Gianmosè Oprandi; Fabio Lanfranco; Stefano Allasia; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marco Alessandro Minetto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  C Scott Bickel; Chris M Gregory; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sidney Grosprêtre; Paul Stapley; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Alteration of neural action potential patterns by axonal stimulation: the importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  Patrick E Crago; Nathaniel S Makowski
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Is the notion of central fatigue based on a solid foundation?

Authors:  Paola Contessa; Alessio Puleo; Carlo J De Luca
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Fatigue modulates synchronous but not asynchronous soleus activation during stimulation of paralyzed muscle.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.