Literature DB >> 27832527

Prediction of Mass Spectral Response Factors from Predicted Chemometric Data for Druglike Molecules.

Christopher J Cramer1, Joshua L Johnson2,3, Amin M Kamel4,5.   

Abstract

A method is developed for the prediction of mass spectral ion counts of drug-like molecules using in silico calculated chemometric data. Various chemometric data, including polar and molecular surface areas, aqueous solvation free energies, and gas-phase and aqueous proton affinities were computed, and a statistically significant relationship between measured mass spectral ion counts and the combination of aqueous proton affinity and total molecular surface area was identified. In particular, through multilinear regression of ion counts on predicted chemometric data, we find that log10(MS ion counts) = -4.824 + c 1•PA + c 2•SA, where PA is the aqueous proton affinity of the molecule computed at the SMD(aq)/M06-L/MIDI!//M06-L/MIDI! level of electronic structure theory, SA is the total surface area of the molecule in its conjugate base form, and c 1 and c 2 have values of -3.912 × 10-2 mol kcal-1 and 3.682 × 10-3 Å-2. On a 66-molecule training set, this regression exhibits a multiple R value of 0.791 with p values for the intercept, c 1, and c 2 of 1.4 × 10-3, 4.3 × 10-10, and 2.5 × 10-6, respectively. Application of this regression to an 11-molecule test set provides a good correlation of prediction with experiment (R = 0.905) albeit with a systematic underestimation of about 0.2 log units. This method may prove useful for semiquantitative analysis of drug metabolites for which MS response factors or authentic standards are not readily available. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aqueous proton affinity; Chemometric data; Mass spectral ion counts of drug-like molecules; Total surface area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832527     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-016-1536-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  21 in total

1.  Importance of gas-phase proton affinities in determining the electrospray ionization response for analytes and solvents.

Authors:  M H Amad; N B Cech; G S Jackson; C G Enke
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  Multiply charged negative ions by electrospray ionization of polypeptides and proteins.

Authors:  J A Loo; R R Loo; K J Light; C G Edmonds; R D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Using the partial least squares method to model the electrospray ionization response produced by small pharmaceutical molecules in positive mode.

Authors:  Varvara J Mandra; Maria G Kouskoura; Catherine K Markopoulou
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Toward single-calibrant quantification in HPLC. A comparison of three detection strategies: evaporative light scattering, chemiluminescent nitrogen, and proton NMR.

Authors:  Steve Lane; Bob Boughtflower; Ian Mutton; Clare Paterson; Duncan Farrant; Nick Taylor; Zoe Blaxill; Carol Carmody; Phil Borman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models.

Authors:  Jacopo Tomasi; Benedetta Mennucci; Roberto Cammi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Determination of relative response factors for chromatographic investigations using NMR spectrometry.

Authors:  Gregory K Webster; Ian Marsden; Cynthia A Pommerening; Christina M Tyrakowski; Brian Tobias
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  Effects of mobile-phase additives, solution pH, ionization constant, and analyte concentration on the sensitivities and electrospray ionization mass spectra of nucleoside antiviral agents.

Authors:  A M Kamel; P R Brown; B Munson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Evaluation of evaporative light-scattering detection for metabolite quantification without authentic analytical standards or radiolabel.

Authors:  Harvey E Fries; Christopher A Evans; Keith W Ward
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlorotetracycline, minocycline, and methacycline.

Authors:  A M Kamel; P R Brown; B Munson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Composition and quantitation of microalgal lipids by ERETIC ¹H NMR method.

Authors:  Genoveffa Nuzzo; Carmela Gallo; Giuliana d'Ippolito; Adele Cutignano; Angela Sardo; Angelo Fontana
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.118

View more
  1 in total

1.  Formaldehyde treatment of proteins enhances proteolytic degradation by the endo-lysosomal protease cathepsin S.

Authors:  Thomas J M Michiels; Hugo D Meiring; Wim Jiskoot; Gideon F A Kersten; Bernard Metz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.