Literature DB >> 27831881

A Bottom-Up Approach for Pancreas Segmentation Using Cascaded Superpixels and (Deep) Image Patch Labeling.

Amal Farag, Holger R Roth, Jiamin Liu, Evrim Turkbey, Ronald M Summers.   

Abstract

Robust organ segmentation is a prerequisite for computer-aided diagnosis, quantitative imaging analysis, pathology detection, and surgical assistance. For organs with high anatomical variability (e.g., the pancreas), previous segmentation approaches report low accuracies, compared with well-studied organs, such as the liver or heart. We present an automated bottom-up approach for pancreas segmentation in abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. The method generates a hierarchical cascade of information propagation by classifying image patches at different resolutions and cascading (segments) superpixels. The system contains four steps: 1) decomposition of CT slice images into a set of disjoint boundary-preserving superpixels; 2) computation of pancreas class probability maps via dense patch labeling; 3) superpixel classification by pooling both intensity and probability features to form empirical statistics in cascaded random forest frameworks; and 4) simple connectivity based post-processing. Dense image patch labeling is conducted using two methods: efficient random forest classification on image histogram, location and texture features; and more expensive (but more accurate) deep convolutional neural network classification, on larger image windows (i.e., with more spatial contexts). Over-segmented 2-D CT slices by the simple linear iterative clustering approach are adopted through model/parameter calibration and labeled at the superpixel level for positive (pancreas) or negative (non-pancreas or background) classes. The proposed method is evaluated on a data set of 80 manually segmented CT volumes, using six-fold cross-validation. Its performance equals or surpasses other state-of-the-art methods (evaluated by "leave-one-patient-out"), with a dice coefficient of 70.7% and Jaccard index of 57.9%. In addition, the computational efficiency has improved significantly, requiring a mere 6 ~ 8 min per testing case, versus ≥ 10 h for other methods. The segmentation framework using deep patch labeling confidences is also more numerically stable, as reflected in the smaller performance metric standard deviations. Finally, we implement a multi-atlas label fusion (MALF) approach for pancreas segmentation using the same data set. Under six-fold cross-validation, our bottom-up segmentation method significantly outperforms its MALF counterpart: 70.7±13.0% versus 52.51±20.84% in dice coefficients.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27831881     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2624198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  17 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Automatic Organ Segmentation for CT Scans Based on Super-Pixel and Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Xiaoming Liu; Shuxu Guo; Bingtao Yang; Shuzhi Ma; Huimao Zhang; Jing Li; Changjian Sun; Lanyi Jin; Xueyan Li; Qi Yang; Yu Fu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Context-guided fully convolutional networks for joint craniomaxillofacial bone segmentation and landmark digitization.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mingxia Liu; Li Wang; Si Chen; Peng Yuan; Jianfu Li; Steve Guo-Fang Shen; Zhen Tang; Ken-Chung Chen; James J Xia; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Automatic quadriceps and patellae segmentation of MRI with cascaded U2 -Net and SASSNet deep learning model.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Marion Crouzier; François Hug; Kylie Tucker; Paul Juneau; Evan McCreedy; William Gandler; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  Deep Semantic Segmentation of Kidney and Space-Occupying Lesion Area Based on SCNN and ResNet Models Combined with SIFT-Flow Algorithm.

Authors:  Kai-Jian Xia; Hong-Sheng Yin; Yu-Dong Zhang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Quantitative Computed Tomography Image Analysis.

Authors:  Marc A Attiyeh; Jayasree Chakraborty; Alexandre Doussot; Liana Langdon-Embry; Shiana Mainarich; Mithat Gönen; Vinod P Balachandran; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Amber L Simpson; Richard K Do
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  MDU-Net: A Convolutional Network for Clavicle and Rib Segmentation from a Chest Radiograph.

Authors:  Wenjing Wang; Hongwei Feng; Qirong Bu; Lei Cui; Yilin Xie; Aoqi Zhang; Jun Feng; Zhaohui Zhu; Zhongyuanlong Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 9.  Skin Cancer Detection: A Review Using Deep Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Mehwish Dildar; Shumaila Akram; Muhammad Irfan; Hikmat Ullah Khan; Muhammad Ramzan; Abdur Rehman Mahmood; Soliman Ayed Alsaiari; Abdul Hakeem M Saeed; Mohammed Olaythah Alraddadi; Mater Hussen Mahnashi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  A Semiautomated Deep Learning Approach for Pancreas Segmentation.

Authors:  Meixiang Huang; Chongfei Huang; Jing Yuan; Dexing Kong
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.