Giovanni Mistraletti1,2, Michele Umbrello3, Elena Silvia Mantovani3, Benedetta Moroni4, Paolo Formenti3, Paolo Spanu3, Stefania Anania3, Elisa Andrighi3, Alessandra Di Carlo3, Federica Martinetti3, Irene Vecchi3, Alessandra Palo5, Cristina Pinna6, Riccarda Russo7, Silvia Francesconi8, Federico Valdambrini9, Enrica Ferretti10, Giulio Radeschi11, Edda Bosco12, Paolo Malacarne13, Gaetano Iapichino4,3. 1. Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, A.O. San Paolo-Polo Universitario, Via A. Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. giovanni.mistraletti@unimi.it. 2. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione, Dipartimento Emergenza-Urgenza, A.O. San Paolo-Polo Universitario, Milan, Italy. giovanni.mistraletti@unimi.it. 3. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione, Dipartimento Emergenza-Urgenza, A.O. San Paolo-Polo Universitario, Milan, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, A.O. San Paolo-Polo Universitario, Via A. Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. 5. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, I.R.C.C.S. San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. 6. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione, Dipartimento di Area Critica, Nuovo Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense, Modena, Italy. 7. U.O.C. Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. 8. U.O.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione, A. O. Ospedale Civile di Desio, Desio, Milan, Italy. 9. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione, A.O. Ospedale Civile di Legnano, Legnano, Milan, Italy. 10. S.C. Anestesia Rianimazione B DEA, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco, Turin, Italy. 11. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione, A.O. U. San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. 12. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione, A.O. Cardinal Massaia, Asti, Italy. 13. U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione-P.S, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Good communication between ICU staff and patients' relatives may reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety or depression, and dissatisfaction with clinicians. An information brochure and website to meet relatives' needs were designed to explain in technical yet simple terms what happens during and after an ICU stay, to legitimize emotions such as fear, apprehension, and suffering, and to improve cooperation with relatives without increasing staff workload. The main outcomes were improved understanding of prognosis and procedures, and decrease of relatives' anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter before-and-after study, a self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate relatives' understanding of prognosis, treatments, and organ dysfunction, families' satisfaction, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. RESULTS: A total of 551 relatives received questionnaires in nine Italian ICUs; 332 (60%) responded, 144 before and 179 after implementation of the brochure and website. Of the 179 relatives who responded after, 131 (73%) stated they had read the brochure and 34 (19%) reported viewing the website. The intervention was associated with increased correct understanding of the prognosis (from 69 to 84%, p = 0.04) and the therapeutic procedures (from 17 to 28%, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis, together with non-modifiable factors (relative's gender, education level, relationship to patient, and patient status at ICU discharge), showed the intervention to be significantly associated with a lower incidence of post-traumatic stress symptoms (Poisson coefficient = -0.29, 95% CI -0.52/-0.07). The intervention had no effect on the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: An information brochure and website designed to meet relatives' needs improved family members' comprehension and reduced their prevalence of stress symptoms.
PURPOSE: Good communication between ICU staff and patients' relatives may reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety or depression, and dissatisfaction with clinicians. An information brochure and website to meet relatives' needs were designed to explain in technical yet simple terms what happens during and after an ICU stay, to legitimize emotions such as fear, apprehension, and suffering, and to improve cooperation with relatives without increasing staff workload. The main outcomes were improved understanding of prognosis and procedures, and decrease of relatives' anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter before-and-after study, a self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate relatives' understanding of prognosis, treatments, and organ dysfunction, families' satisfaction, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. RESULTS: A total of 551 relatives received questionnaires in nine Italian ICUs; 332 (60%) responded, 144 before and 179 after implementation of the brochure and website. Of the 179 relatives who responded after, 131 (73%) stated they had read the brochure and 34 (19%) reported viewing the website. The intervention was associated with increased correct understanding of the prognosis (from 69 to 84%, p = 0.04) and the therapeutic procedures (from 17 to 28%, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis, together with non-modifiable factors (relative's gender, education level, relationship to patient, and patient status at ICU discharge), showed the intervention to be significantly associated with a lower incidence of post-traumatic stress symptoms (Poisson coefficient = -0.29, 95% CI -0.52/-0.07). The intervention had no effect on the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: An information brochure and website designed to meet relatives' needs improved family members' comprehension and reduced their prevalence of stress symptoms.
Authors: Jennifer L McAdam; Kathleen A Dracup; Douglas B White; Dorothy K Fontaine; Kathleen A Puntillo Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Giovanni Mistraletti; Elena S Mantovani; Paolo Cadringher; Barbara Cerri; Davide Corbella; Michele Umbrello; Stefania Anania; Elisa Andrighi; Serena Barello; Alessandra Di Carlo; Federica Martinetti; Paolo Formenti; Paolo Spanu; Gaetano Iapichino Journal: Trials Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; Oliver J Schofield-Robinson; David Jw Evans; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-13
Authors: Alison E Turnbull; Mohamed D Hashem; Anahita Rabiee; An To; Caroline M Chessare; Dale M Needham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Magdalena Hoffmann; Anna K Holl; Harald Burgsteiner; Philipp Eller; Thomas R Pieber; Karin Amrein Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Leopoldo M Amendola; Alessandro Galazzi; Irene Zainaghi; Ivan Cortinovis; Anna Zolin; Rik T Gerritsen; Ileana Adamini; Maura Lusignani; Dario Laquintana Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: M Hoffmann; M Taibinger; A K Holl; H Burgsteiner; T R Pieber; P Eller; G Sendlhofer; K Amrein Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 0.840