| Literature DB >> 27829896 |
Munetaka Kunishima1, Daiki Kato1, Nobu Kimura1, Masanori Kitamura1, Kohei Yamada1, Kazuhito Hioki2.
Abstract
This study describes the synthesis of triazine-based dehydrocondensing reagents substituted by amido substituents and demonstrates their efficiency for dehydrocondensing reactions in MeOH and THF. N-Phenylbenzamido-substituted chlorotriazine is readily converted to a stable, non-hygroscopic triazinylammonium-based dehydrocondensing reagent that is superior to 4-(4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride (DMT-MM) in terms of its reactivity in dehydrocondensing reactions.Entities:
Keywords: Fischer-type esterification; amide-forming reactions; amido substituents; dehydrocondensing reactions; triazines
Year: 2016 PMID: 27829896 PMCID: PMC5082469 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.12.179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1Dehydrocondensing reactions using DMT-MM or DMT-Am, and a catalytic amide-forming reaction.
Figure 1Structures of amido-substituted chlorotriazines.
Scheme 2Synthesis of amido-substituted chlorotriazines.
Amide-forming reactions using chlorotriazines (I–VI) or triazinylammonium salts (VII–X).
| chlorotriazine | (a) in situ amidation | (b) preparation of condensing reagents ( | (c) amidation using | ||||||
| yield (%) | yield (%) | ||||||||
| in MeOH | in THF | additive | yield (%) | in MeOH | in THF | ||||
| CDMT | 88 | 81 | DMT-MM | – | 100 | 98 | 84 | ||
| 70 | 55 | –a | –a | –a | –a | –a | |||
| 86 | 80 | –a | –a | –a | –a | –a | |||
| 95 | 60 | LiClO4 (1.1 equiv) | 98 | 75 | 50 | ||||
| 90 | 73 | LiClO4 (1.1 equiv) | 91 | 88 | 84 | ||||
| 91 | 72 | – | 90 | 75 | 81 | ||||
| 93 | 79 | – | 80 | 95 | 89 | ||||
aThe reaction was not conducted. bThe counter anions were shown in parentheses.
Substrate scope of carboxylic acids 1 and amines 2.
| DMT-MM | |||||||||||
| time (h) | yield (%)a | time (h) | yield (%)a | ||||||||
| entry | carboxylic acid | amine | amide | solvent | |||||||
| 1 | MeOH | 6 | 80 | (1) | 24 | 73 | (0) | ||||
| 2 | THF | 6 | 75 | – | 24 | 16 | – | ||||
| 3 | MeOH | 6 | 65 | (31) | 9 | 56 | 24 | ||||
| 4 | THF | 4 | 85 | – | 4 | 68b | – | ||||
| 5 | MeOH | 6 | (87) | (3) | 6 | (89) | (0) | ||||
| 6 | THF | 3 | (90) | – | 3 | (86) | – | ||||
| 7 | MeOH | 4 | 97 | (8) | 3 | 90 | (1) | ||||
| 8 | THF | 4 | 95 | – | 4 | 81b | – | ||||
| 9 | MeOH | 4 | 91 | (2) | 3 | 86 | (4) | ||||
| 10 | THF | 4 | 96 | – | 3 | 82b | – | ||||
aIsolated yields. 1H NMR yields are given in parentheses. bFrom reference [2].
Figure 2Time courses of the amide-forming reactions.
Figure 3Time courses of the basic Fischer-type esterification.