OBJECTIVES: The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) was developed to screen for HIV-associated dementia, but it has been used more generally for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). This study sought to examine the accuracy of the IHDS in a cohort of Brazilian HIV-infected individuals and compare its performance to an alternative screening battery for detecting HAND. METHODS: A total of 108 participants (including 60 HIV-infected persons) completed the IHDS and a gold standard neuropsychological (NP) battery of 17 tests. As alternative screening method, all possible 3-test combinations from the NP battery were examined and a superiority index (a marker of specificity and sensitivity) was calculated. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity to HAND using the standard IHDS cutpoint of 10 were 36% and 75%, respectively. The best balance between sensitivity and specificity was accomplished with a modified cutpoint of 11.5, which yielded sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 58%. The top two most sensitive test combinations, compared with the gold standard NP battery, were Trail Making Test A, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Digit Symbol and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Recall (sensitivity 91%, specificity 96%), and Digit Symbol, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Total Recall and Grooved Pegboard Test-dominant hand (sensitivity 94%, specificity 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Both test combinations can be administered in less than 10 minutes and were more accurate than the IHDS in classifying HIV+ participants as NP impaired or unimpaired. These data suggest that demographically corrected T-scores from commonly used NP measures with modest time and material demands can improve identification of patients with HAND who may benefit from a more extensive NP examination.
OBJECTIVES: The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) was developed to screen for HIV-associated dementia, but it has been used more generally for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). This study sought to examine the accuracy of the IHDS in a cohort of Brazilian HIV-infected individuals and compare its performance to an alternative screening battery for detecting HAND. METHODS: A total of 108 participants (including 60 HIV-infectedpersons) completed the IHDS and a gold standard neuropsychological (NP) battery of 17 tests. As alternative screening method, all possible 3-test combinations from the NP battery were examined and a superiority index (a marker of specificity and sensitivity) was calculated. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity to HAND using the standard IHDS cutpoint of 10 were 36% and 75%, respectively. The best balance between sensitivity and specificity was accomplished with a modified cutpoint of 11.5, which yielded sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 58%. The top two most sensitive test combinations, compared with the gold standard NP battery, were Trail Making Test A, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Digit Symbol and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Recall (sensitivity 91%, specificity 96%), and Digit Symbol, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Total Recall and Grooved Pegboard Test-dominant hand (sensitivity 94%, specificity 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Both test combinations can be administered in less than 10 minutes and were more accurate than the IHDS in classifying HIV+ participants as NP impaired or unimpaired. These data suggest that demographically corrected T-scores from commonly used NP measures with modest time and material demands can improve identification of patients with HAND who may benefit from a more extensive NP examination.
Authors: Catherine L Carey; Steven Paul Woods; Julie D Rippeth; Raul Gonzalez; David J Moore; Thomas D Marcotte; Igor Grant; Robert K Heaton Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: R J Ellis; R Deutsch; R K Heaton; T D Marcotte; J A McCutchan; J A Nelson; I Abramson; L J Thal; J H Atkinson; M R Wallace; I Grant Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1997-04
Authors: John A Joska; Jennifer Westgarth-Taylor; Jacqueline Hoare; Kevin G F Thomas; Robert Paul; Landon Myer; Dan J Stein Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: D Riedel; M Ghate; M Nene; Rs Paranjape; Sm Mehendale; Rc Bollinger; N Sacktor; Jc McArthur; A Nath Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Ned C Sacktor; Matthew Wong; Noeline Nakasujja; Richard L Skolasky; Ola A Selnes; Seggane Musisi; Kevin Robertson; Justin C McArthur; Allan Ronald; Elly Katabira Journal: AIDS Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Georgette D Kanmogne; Callixte T Kuate; Lucette A Cysique; Julius Y Fonsah; Sabine Eta; Roland Doh; Dora M Njamnshi; Emilienne Nchindap; Donald R Franklin; Ronald J Ellis; John A McCutchan; Fidele Binam; Dora Mbanya; Robert K Heaton; Alfred K Njamnshi Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Lucette A Cysique; Hua Jin; Donald R Franklin; Erin E Morgan; Chuan Shi; Xin Yu; Zunyou Wu; Michael J Taylor; Thomas D Marcotte; Scott Letendre; Christopher Ake; Igor Grant; Robert K Heaton Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Hetta Gouse; Martine Casson-Crook; Eric H Decloedt; John A Joska; Kevin G F Thomas Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: David Grethlein; Vanessa Pirrone; Kathryn N Devlin; Will Dampier; Zsofia Szep; Flaura K Winston; Santiago Ontañón; Elizabeth A Walshe; Kim Malone; Shinika Tillman; Beau M Ances; Venk Kandadai; Dennis L Kolson; Brian Wigdahl Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 5.152
Authors: Monica M Diaz; Marcela Gil Zacarías; Patricia Sotolongo; María F Sanes; Donald J Franklin; María J Marquine; Mariana Cherner; Cesar Cárcamo; Ronald J Ellis; Serggio Lanata; Patricia J García Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 4.086