Elizabeth Lee1, Christine P Collier2, Christine A White3. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and. 2. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and cw38@queensu.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The tracing of creatinine (Cr) reference materials to isotope dilution mass spectrometry-assigned values was implemented worldwide to reduce interlaboratory variability and improve assay accuracy. The aims of this study were to examine the current extent of interlaboratory variability and its effect on eGFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Leftover plasma from 2-3 consecutive days was obtained from 53 intensive care unit patients with a range of kidney functions. Individual patient samples were pooled and split and sent to 12 different laboratories for Cr measurement. For each patient, the mean Cr and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR (eGFR-EPI), assuming a 65-year-old nonblack woman, were determined. Interlaboratory variability was assessed by the range and SD of Cr and eGFR-EPI. This was repeated after stratifying by assay type and by the median Cr of 1.36 mg/dl. For patients whose eGFR-EPI range included 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the percentage of laboratories with eGFR-EPI<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was determined. RESULTS: The mean±SD of the Cr and eGFR-EPI ranges were 0.20±0.09 mg/dl and 14±9 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for Cr<1.36 mg/dl. Jaffe Cr results were an average 0.1 mg/dl (Cr≥1.36 mg/dl) and 0.05 mg/dl (Cr<1.36 mg/dl) higher than enzymatic results (P<0.001 for both). Ten patients had an eGFR-EPI range that included 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Their median eGFR-EPI range was 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2. There was significant discordance in the diagnosis of CKD (eGFR-EPI<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2), with laboratories using Jaffe Cr methods making the diagnosis more frequently than those using enzymatic Cr methods (60% versus 39%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant interlaboratory variability in Cr measurement still exists. Jaffe assays yield higher Cr values than enzymatic assays, leading to lower eGFR-EPIs and more frequent CKD diagnoses. Further improvements in assay performance are required to standardize patient CKD diagnosis and to facilitate longitudinal Cr monitoring across laboratories.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The tracing of creatinine (Cr) reference materials to isotope dilution mass spectrometry-assigned values was implemented worldwide to reduce interlaboratory variability and improve assay accuracy. The aims of this study were to examine the current extent of interlaboratory variability and its effect on eGFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Leftover plasma from 2-3 consecutive days was obtained from 53 intensive care unit patients with a range of kidney functions. Individual patient samples were pooled and split and sent to 12 different laboratories for Cr measurement. For each patient, the mean Cr and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR (eGFR-EPI), assuming a 65-year-old nonblack woman, were determined. Interlaboratory variability was assessed by the range and SD of Cr and eGFR-EPI. This was repeated after stratifying by assay type and by the median Cr of 1.36 mg/dl. For patients whose eGFR-EPI range included 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the percentage of laboratories with eGFR-EPI<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was determined. RESULTS: The mean±SD of the Cr and eGFR-EPI ranges were 0.20±0.09 mg/dl and 14±9 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for Cr<1.36 mg/dl. Jaffe Cr results were an average 0.1 mg/dl (Cr≥1.36 mg/dl) and 0.05 mg/dl (Cr<1.36 mg/dl) higher than enzymatic results (P<0.001 for both). Ten patients had an eGFR-EPI range that included 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Their median eGFR-EPI range was 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2. There was significant discordance in the diagnosis of CKD (eGFR-EPI<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2), with laboratories using Jaffe Cr methods making the diagnosis more frequently than those using enzymatic Cr methods (60% versus 39%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant interlaboratory variability in Cr measurement still exists. Jaffe assays yield higher Cr values than enzymatic assays, leading to lower eGFR-EPIs and more frequent CKD diagnoses. Further improvements in assay performance are required to standardize patient CKD diagnosis and to facilitate longitudinal Cr monitoring across laboratories.
Authors: Gary L Myers; W Greg Miller; Josef Coresh; James Fleming; Neil Greenberg; Tom Greene; Thomas Hostetter; Andrew S Levey; Mauro Panteghini; Michael Welch; John H Eckfeldt Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Howard A Fink; Areef Ishani; Brent C Taylor; Nancy L Greer; Roderick MacDonald; Dominic Rossini; Sameea Sadiq; Srilakshmi Lankireddy; Robert L Kane; Timothy J Wilt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Josef Coresh; Brad C Astor; Geraldine McQuillan; John Kusek; Tom Greene; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Danielle E Soranno; Hyo-Wook Gil; Lara Kirkbride-Romeo; Christopher Altmann; John R Montford; Haichun Yang; Ani Levine; Jane Buchanan; Sarah Faubel Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Damian Feldman-Kiss; Dailin Li; Richard Cleve; Graham Sinclair; Joshua A Dubland; Li Wang Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Manuela Yepes-Calderón; Camilo G Sotomayor; Matthias Kretzler; Rijk O B Gans; Stefan P Berger; Gerjan J Navis; Wenjun Ju; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Antonin Dauvin; Carolina Donado; Patrik Bachtiger; Ke-Chun Huang; Christopher Martin Sauer; Daniele Ramazzotti; Matteo Bonvini; Leo Anthony Celi; Molly J Douglas Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2019-11-29
Authors: Christopher McCudden; Ayub Akbari; Christine A White; Mohan Biyani; Swapnil Hiremath; Pierre Antoine Brown; Navdeep Tangri; Scott Brimble; Greg Knoll; Peter G Blake; Manish M Sood Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240