Literature DB >> 31890681

Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimation using Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assays in diabetic patients.

Farshad Niazpour1, Alireza Bahiraee2, Ensieh Nasli Esfahani3, Maryam Abdollahi3, Fatemeh Bandarian4, Farideh Razi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) develops an end-stage renal failure and is a major cause of death in diabetic patients. A GFR below 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 is one of the main markers of DKD. Therefore, the development of an accurate test for diagnosis and monitoring of the mentioned disease would be essential. Here, we examined the impacts of two different kits with different methods for creatinine measurement on the GFR values.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 80 diabetic patients referring to the clinical laboratory. The levels of serum creatinine were assessed using Jaffé and enzymatic assays by kits from two different manufacturers. Then to assess the eGFR levels, the MDRD equation was used. Further descriptive parameters of both methods and correlation of methods were also calculated.
RESULTS: Descriptive analysis of the data demonstrates a slight increase in the serum creatinine measured by Jaffé assay which leads to a substantial decrease in the levels of eGFR compared to the eGFR calculated by the enzymatic assay. Moreover, eGFR over 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in enzymatic assay was observed in 27.5% of participants while eGFR of the same participants was below 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 when it was measured by Jaffé method. Consequently, 27.5% positive discordant cases were reported by Jaffé assay followed by misclassifying them as DKD patients compared with the enzymatic assay.
CONCLUSION: While using Jaffé assay, a low level of eGFR is observed which generates more misclassification into the DKD group and demands to an inclusive consideration by physicians in order to diagnose and monitor the DKD patients. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Creatinine, glomerular filtration rate; Diabetic kidney disease; Enzymatic assay; Jaffé assay

Year:  2019        PMID: 31890681      PMCID: PMC6915165          DOI: 10.1007/s40200-019-00462-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord        ISSN: 2251-6581


  21 in total

1.  Glucose and acetone as sources of error in plasma creatinine determinations.

Authors:  H N HAUGEN
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1954       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  Specificity characteristics of 7 commercial creatinine measurement procedures by enzymatic and Jaffe method principles.

Authors:  Neil Greenberg; William L Roberts; Lorin M Bachmann; Elizabeth C Wright; R Neil Dalton; Jack J Zakowski; W Greg Miller
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Does bilirubin cause interference in Roche creatinine methods?

Authors:  Laura J Owen; Brian G Keevil
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Prime time for enzymatic creatinine methods in pediatrics.

Authors:  Christa M Cobbaert; Henk Baadenhuijsen; Cas W Weykamp
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  CKD in diabetes: diabetic kidney disease versus nondiabetic kidney disease.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Anders; Tobias B Huber; Berend Isermann; Mario Schiffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 6.  Albuminuria and diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Shirley S Chang
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2008-08

7.  Exogenous interferences with Jaffe creatinine assays: addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate to reagent eliminates bilirubin and total protein interference with Jaffe methods.

Authors:  P Srisawasdi; U Chaichanajarernkul; N Teerakanjana; S Vanavanan; M H Kroll
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 8.  Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program.

Authors:  Gary L Myers; W Greg Miller; Josef Coresh; James Fleming; Neil Greenberg; Tom Greene; Thomas Hostetter; Andrew S Levey; Mauro Panteghini; Michael Welch; John H Eckfeldt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Lesley A Stevens; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Stephen Hendriksen; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of creatinine methodology on glomerular filtration rate estimation in diabetes.

Authors:  Marijana Vučić Lovrenčić; Vanja Radišić Biljak; Kristina Blaslov; Sandra Božičević; Lea Smirčić Duvnjak
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2017-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.