Adriana M Hung1,2,3, Christianne L Roumie4,2,3, Robert A Greevy4,5, Carlos G Grijalva4,6, Xulei Liu4,5, Harvey J Murff4,3, T Alp Ikizler2,3, Marie R Griffin4,3,6. 1. Health Services Research and Development Center, Veterans Health Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Adriana.hung@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Veterans Health Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Clinical Science Research and Development, Nashville, Tennessee; and. 3. Departments of Medicine. 4. Health Services Research and Development Center, Veterans Health Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Biostatistics, and. 6. Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is the leading cause of ESRD. Glucose control improves kidney outcomes. Most patients eventually require treatment intensification with second-line medications; however, the differential effects of those therapies on kidney function are unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: We studied a retrospective cohort of veterans on metformin monotherapy from 2001 to 2008 who added either insulin or sulfonylurea and were followed through September of 2011. We used propensity score matching 1:4 for those who intensified with insulin versus sulfonylurea, respectively. The primary composite outcome was persistent decline in eGFR≥35% from baseline (GFR event) or a diagnosis of ESRD. The secondary outcome was a GFR event, ESRD, or death. Outcome risks were compared using marginal structural models to account for time-varying covariates. The primary analysis required persistence with the intensified regimen. An effect modification of baseline eGFR and the intervention on both outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 1989 patients on metformin and insulin and 7956 patients on metformin and sulfonylurea. Median patient age was 60 years old (interquartile range, 54-67), median hemoglobin A1c was 8.1% (interquartile range, 7.1%-9.9%), and median creatinine was 1.0 mg/dl (interquartile range, 0.9-1.1). The rate of GFR event or ESRD (primary outcome) was 31 versus 26 per 1000 person-years for those who added insulin versus sulfonylureas, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.63). The rate of GFR event, ESRD, or death was 64 versus 49 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.59). Tests for a therapy by baseline eGFR interaction for both the primary and secondary outcomes were not significant (P=0.39 and P=0.12, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who intensified metformin monotherapy, the addition of insulin compared with a sulfonylurea was not associated with a higher rate of kidney outcomes but was associated with a higher rate of the composite outcome that included death. These risks were not modified by baseline eGFR.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Diabetes is the leading cause of ESRD. Glucose control improves kidney outcomes. Most patients eventually require treatment intensification with second-line medications; however, the differential effects of those therapies on kidney function are unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: We studied a retrospective cohort of veterans on metformin monotherapy from 2001 to 2008 who added either insulin or sulfonylurea and were followed through September of 2011. We used propensity score matching 1:4 for those who intensified with insulin versus sulfonylurea, respectively. The primary composite outcome was persistent decline in eGFR≥35% from baseline (GFR event) or a diagnosis of ESRD. The secondary outcome was a GFR event, ESRD, or death. Outcome risks were compared using marginal structural models to account for time-varying covariates. The primary analysis required persistence with the intensified regimen. An effect modification of baseline eGFR and the intervention on both outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 1989 patients on metformin and insulin and 7956 patients on metformin and sulfonylurea. Median patient age was 60 years old (interquartile range, 54-67), median hemoglobin A1c was 8.1% (interquartile range, 7.1%-9.9%), and median creatinine was 1.0 mg/dl (interquartile range, 0.9-1.1). The rate of GFR event or ESRD (primary outcome) was 31 versus 26 per 1000 person-years for those who added insulin versus sulfonylureas, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.63). The rate of GFR event, ESRD, or death was 64 versus 49 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.59). Tests for a therapy by baseline eGFR interaction for both the primary and secondary outcomes were not significant (P=0.39 and P=0.12, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who intensified metformin monotherapy, the addition of insulin compared with a sulfonylurea was not associated with a higher rate of kidney outcomes but was associated with a higher rate of the composite outcome that included death. These risks were not modified by baseline eGFR.
Authors: R A Greevy; M M Huizinga; C L Roumie; C G Grijalva; H Murff; X Liu; M R Griffin Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Marcello Tonelli; Paul Muntner; Anita Lloyd; Braden J Manns; Scott Klarenbach; Neesh Pannu; Matthew T James; Brenda R Hemmelgarn Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Kristin Koelling; Kevin Stroupe; Noreen Arnold; Katherine Mallin; Min-Woong Sohn; Frances M Weaver; Larry Manheim; Linda Kok Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns; Anita Lloyd; Matthew T James; Scott Klarenbach; Robert R Quinn; Natasha Wiebe; Marcello Tonelli Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Y Ohkubo; H Kishikawa; E Araki; T Miyata; S Isami; S Motoyoshi; Y Kojima; N Furuyoshi; M Shichiri Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Vlado Perkovic; Hiddo Lambers Heerspink; John Chalmers; Mark Woodward; Min Jun; Qiang Li; Stephen MacMahon; Mark E Cooper; Pavel Hamet; Michel Marre; Carl Erik Mogensen; Neil Poulter; Giuseppe Mancia; Alan Cass; Anushka Patel; Sophia Zoungas Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: John F McCarthy; Marcia Valenstein; H Myra Kim; Mark Ilgen; Kara Zivin; Frederic C Blow Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sophia Zoungas; John Chalmers; Bruce Neal; Laurent Billot; Qiang Li; Yoichiro Hirakawa; Hisatomi Arima; Helen Monaghan; Rohina Joshi; Stephen Colagiuri; Mark E Cooper; Paul Glasziou; Diederick Grobbee; Pavel Hamet; Stephen Harrap; Simon Heller; Liu Lisheng; Giuseppe Mancia; Michel Marre; David R Matthews; Carl E Mogensen; Vlado Perkovic; Neil Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Bryan Williams; Stephen MacMahon; Anushka Patel; Mark Woodward Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adriana M Hung; Christianne L Roumie; Robert A Greevy; Xulei Liu; Carlos G Grijalva; Harvey J Murff; T Alp Ikizler; Marie R Griffin Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Kamlesh Khunti; Marilia B Gomes; Mikhail Kosiborod; Antonio Nicolucci; Stuart Pocock; Wolfgang Rathmann; Marina V Shestakova; Iichiro Shimomura; Hirotaka Watada; Hungta Chen; Javier Cid-Ruzafa; Peter Fenici; Niklas Hammar; Fengming Tang; Linong Ji Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-30 Impact factor: 2.692