| Literature DB >> 27826295 |
Gunjan Singh1, Arshad Jawed2, Debarati Paul1, Kalyan K Bandyopadhyay1, Abha Kumari1, Shafiul Haque3.
Abstract
As a replacement to existing fossil fuels, biofuels, have proven their worth; however, their widespread use is limited due to inconsistent yields, higher costs and poor productivity. An oleaginous yeast, Rhodosporidium toruloides has been reported to accumulate substantial amounts of lipids (that can be converted to biofuels) and therefore, it was selected for study and optimization. Apart from lipids, R. toruloides is also reported to produce carotene that can be used as a therapeutic agent. In this study, the culture medium was statistically modeled and optimized for concomitant production of lipids and carotenoids and for improving and maximizing the productivity of lipids as well as carotenes. The two metabolites were expressed differentially in the growth cycle of the organism. Culture medium components were simultaneously varied at five different levels using statistical modeling employing response surface methodology (RSM). Osmotic stress was introduced in order to simulate saline conditions and optimize the carotenoid as well as lipid production process, to be used in conditions with high salt contents. We observed a 10% (w/v) increase in carotenoid production in initial experiments under osmotic stress due to high salt concentration, while the increase in lipid synthesis was not pronounced. In this study, we demonstrate 36.2% (w/v) lipid production and 27.2% (w/v) carotenoid production, under osmotic stress with high salt concentrations, for the first time.Entities:
Keywords: RSM; Rhodosporidium toruloides; biofuels; osmotic stress
Year: 2016 PMID: 27826295 PMCID: PMC5078724 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
The experimental design parameters and constrains of design space for participating factors.
| A | Glucose | g/L | Numeric | 5 | 10 | −1 | 1 | 7.5 | 2.17 |
| B | NaCl | g/L | Numeric | 8 | 18 | −1 | 1 | 13 | 4.35 |
| C | Culture Time | h | Numeric | 16 | 26 | −1 | 1 | 21 | 4.35 |
Design of experiments with actual and predicted values of obtained growth, carotene, and lipid in each run.
| 1 | 10.00 | 18.00 | 26.00 | 46.700 | 36.904 | 26.490 | 46.892 | 36.481 | 26.177 |
| 2 | 7.50 | 13.00 | 12.59 | 31.230 | 5.000 | 19.300 | 30.655 | 2.128 | 19.292 |
| 3 | 7.50 | 13.00 | 29.41 | 44.700 | 20.320 | 25.760 | 44.423 | 22.429 | 25.945 |
| 4 | 10.00 | 18.00 | 16.00 | 39.400 | 17.320 | 26.490 | 41.067 | 19.409 | 26.421 |
| 5 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 26.00 | 25.330 | 13.660 | 25.450 | 25.558 | 10.950 | 25.394 |
| 6 | 7.50 | 13.00 | 21.00 | 30.400 | 26.664 | 24.396 | 30.437 | 26.696 | 24.389 |
| 7 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 26.00 | 43.700 | 25.790 | 23.970 | 45.214 | 25.026 | 23.721 |
| 8 | 5.00 | 18.00 | 26.00 | 32.010 | 14.509 | 21.110 | 31.031 | 15.295 | 21.315 |
| 9 | 7.50 | 13.00 | 21.00 | 30.400 | 26.664 | 24.396 | 30.437 | 26.696 | 24.389 |
| 10 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 16.00 | 15.890 | 1.758 | 17.050 | 15.008 | 3.879 | 17.238 |
| 11 | 3.30 | 13.00 | 21.00 | 15.560 | 8.210 | 18.680 | 16.594 | 8.267 | 18.346 |
| 12 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 16.00 | 39.100 | 7.043 | 21.740 | 39.389 | 7.955 | 21.409 |
| 13 | 7.50 | 4.59 | 21.00 | 25.120 | 11.230 | 21.540 | 24.727 | 11.750 | 21.746 |
| 14 | 7.50 | 13.00 | 21.00 | 30.400 | 26.664 | 24.396 | 30.437 | 26.696 | 24.389 |
| 15 | 7.50 | 13.00 | 21.00 | 30.400 | 26.664 | 24.396 | 30.437 | 26.696 | 24.389 |
| 16 | 5.00 | 18.00 | 16.00 | 20.100 | 8.082 | 15.590 | 20.482 | 8.224 | 15.714 |
| 17 | 11.70 | 13.00 | 21.00 | 52.320 | 30.329 | 25.430 | 50.433 | 29.509 | 25.942 |
| 18 | 7.50 | 21.41 | 21.00 | 31.200 | 26.320 | 22.560 | 30.741 | 25.036 | 22.531 |
Modeling parameters and ANOVA for growth, carotene and lipid synthesis.
| 1 | 160.77 | 57.71 | 195.09 | |
| 2 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | |
| 3 | df | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 4 | Lack of Fit | Not Significant | Not Significant | Not Significant |
| 5 | Pure error | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | Std. dev. | 1.18 | 1.94 | 0.320 |
| 7 | Mean | 32.44 | 18.51 | 22.71 |
| 8 | 0.993 | 0.980 | 0.995 | |
| 9 | Adjusted | 0.986 | 0.963 | 0.990 |
| 10 | Predicted | 0.961 | 0.893 | 0.965 |
| 11 | Adequate precision | 42.45 | 25.092 | 44.810 |
Figure 1Growth profile of .
Figure 2Oil globules stained with Sudan B Black in .
Figure 3Biomass (growth), total sugar (g/L), lipid (%, w/w) and carotenoid synthesis (%, w/w) profiles of NaCl, 1% (w/v). (B) NaCl, 5% (w/V). (C) NaCl, 10% (w/v). (D) Graph showing maximum lipid and carotenoid biosynthesis in all three treatments (i.e., with NaCl at 1, 5, and 10% w/v).
ANOVA table for growth of .
| Model | 1791.00 | 8 | 223.88 | 160.77 | < 0.0001 | significant |
| A-glucose | 1382.22 | 1 | 1382.22 | 992.63 | < 0.0001 | |
| B-NaCl | 43.65 | 1 | 43.65 | 31.35 | 0.0003 | |
| C-culture time | 228.84 | 1 | 228.84 | 164.34 | < 0.0001 | |
| AB | 7.20 | 1 | 7.20 | 5.17 | 0.0490 | |
| AC | 11.16 | 1 | 11.16 | 8.02 | 0.0197 | |
| A2 | 14.97 | 1 | 14.97 | 10.75 | 0.0095 | |
| B2 | 11.55 | 1 | 11.55 | 8.29 | 0.0182 | |
| C2 | 79.76 | 1 | 79.76 | 57.28 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 12.53 | 9 | 1.39 | |||
| Lack of fit | 12.53 | 6 | 2.09 | |||
| Pure error | 0.000 | 3 | 0.000 | |||
| Corr total | 1803.53 | 17 |
ANOVA analysis of carotene production.
| Model | 1730.96 | 8 | 216.37 | 57.71 | < 0.0001 | significant |
| A-glucose | 544.68 | 1 | 544.68 | 145.29 | < 0.0001 | |
| B-NaCl | 213.06 | 1 | 213.06 | 56.83 | < 0.0001 | |
| C-culture time | 497.49 | 1 | 497.49 | 132.70 | < 0.0001 | |
| AB | 25.26 | 1 | 25.26 | 6.740 | 0.0289 | |
| AC | 50.00 | 1 | 50.00 | 13.34 | 0.0053 | |
| A2 | 96.41 | 1 | 96.41 | 25.71 | 0.0007 | |
| B2 | 109.00 | 1 | 109.00 | 29.07 | 0.0004 | |
| C2 | 328.69 | 1 | 328.69 | 87.68 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 33.73 | 9 | 3.74 | |||
| Lack Of fit | 33.73 | 6 | 5.62 | |||
| Pure error | 0 | 3 | 0 | |||
| Cor total | 1764.70 | 17 |
ANOVA for lipid synthesis.
| Model | 180.416 | 9 | 20.04 | 195.09 | < 0.001 | significant |
| A-glucose | 69.652 | 1 | 69.65 | 677.88 | < 0.001 | |
| B-NaCl | 0.742 | 1 | 0.742 | 7.23 | 0.027 | |
| C-culture time | 53.436 | 1 | 53.43 | 520.06 | < 0.001 | |
| AB | 21.353 | 1 | 21.35 | 207.81 | < 0.001 | |
| AC | 17.082 | 1 | 17.08 | 166.24 | < 0.001 | |
| BC | 3.264 | 1 | 3.26 | 31.76 | < 0.000 | |
| A2 | 7.969 | 1 | 7.96 | 77.56 | < 0.001 | |
| B2 | 8.005 | 1 | 8.00 | 77.90 | < 0.001 | |
| C2 | 4.954 | 1 | 4.95 | 48.21 | 0.001 | |
| Residual | 0.821 | 8 | 0.10 | |||
| Lack of fit | 0.821 | 5 | 0.16 | |||
| Pure error | 0 | 3 | 0 | |||
| Cor total | 181.238 | 17 |
Figure 4Response surface plot. (A) Effect of culture time (h) vs. glucose (g/L) on growth. (B) Effect of NaCl (g/L) vs. glucose (g/L) on growth. (C) Effect of culture time (h) vs. glucose (g/L) on the carotene synthesis. (D) Effect of NaCl (g/L) vs. glucose (g/L) on carotene synthesis. (E) Effect of culture time (h) vs. glucose (g/L) on lipid production. (F) Effect of NaCl (g/L) vs. glucose (g/L) on lipid production.
Figure 5Parity plot between actual and predicted values of culture growth, carotene synthesis, and lipid production.
Showing yield and productivity of lipids and carotenoids upon addition in control and the three treatments.
| Biomass (g/L) | 31 | 25 | 42 | 38 | |
| Lipid | Lipid% | 42 | 39 | 48 | 43 |
| Yield (YP/S) | 6.19 | 8 | 15 | 12.7 | |
| Yield (YP/x) | 26 | 26.6 | 30 | 28 | |
| Productivity (gL−1h−1) | 0.277 | 0.270 | 0.333 | 0.312 | |
| Carotenoid | Carotenoid% | 49 | 51 | 55 | 59 |
| Yield (YP/S) | 18.1 | 23.3 | 28.4 | 32.5 | |
| Yield (YP/x) | 17 | 17.5 | 18.5 | 20.5 | |
| Productivity (gL−1h−1) | 0.284 | 0.296 | 0.319 | 0.343 | |
Comparative kinetics study of oleaginous yeast strains.
| 42 | MM | 48% | 0.333 | 55 | 0.319 | This study | |
| 69.64 | MM | 27.57% | 0.40 | 59 | 0.29 | Dias et al., | |
| 39 | MM | 1.49 (g/l) | 0.37 (gL−1day−1) | NA | NA | Tanimura et al., | |
| 60 | YPD medium | 31% | 0.43 | NA | NA | Magdalena et al., | |
| 9.43 | Yeast medium | 0.2 (g/l) | 0.025 | NA | NA | Papone et al., |
MM, Minimal medium;
NA, not applicable.