Literature DB >> 27823696

Comparative effectiveness of outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery between advanced practice providers and physician providers in primary care: Implications for care under the Affordable Care Act.

Salim S Virani1, Julia M Akeroyd2, David J Ramsey2, Winston J Chan2, Lorraine Frazier3, Khurram Nasir4, Suja S Rajan5, Christie M Ballantyne6, Laura A Petersen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare quality of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care between advanced practice providers (APPs) and physicians in a primary care setting.
METHODS: We identified diabetes (n=1,022,588) and CVD (n=1,187,035) patients receiving primary care between October 2013 and September 2014 in 130 Veterans Affairs facilities. We compared glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c <7%) in diabetic patients, blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg in diabetic or CVD patients, cholesterol control (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol<100 mg/dL, receiving a statin) in diabetic or CVD patients, and those receiving a β-blocker (with history of myocardial infarction in the last 2 years) among patients receiving care from physicians and APPs. We also compared the proportion meeting composite measure (glycemic, BP, and cholesterol control in diabetic patients; BP, cholesterol control, and receipt of β-blocker among eligible CVD patients).
RESULTS: Diabetic patients receiving care from APPs were statistically more likely to have glycemic (50% vs 51.4%, odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [1.05-1.08]) and BP control (77.5% vs 78.4%, OR 1.04 [1.03-1.06]), whereas patients receiving care from physicians were more likely to have cholesterol control (receipt of statin 68% vs 66.5%, OR 0.94 [0.93-0.95]) in adjusted models, although these differences are not clinically significant. Similar results were seen in CVD patients. Few patients met the composite measure (27.1% and 27.6% of diabetic and 54.0% and 54.8% of CVD patients receiving care from physicians and APPs, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and CVD care quality was comparable between physicians and APPs with clinically insignificant differences. Regardless of provider type, there is a need to improve performance on eligible measures in diabetes or CVD patients. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27823696     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

1.  Implications of Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Rajat Kalra; Vibhu Parcha; Nirav Patel; Anirudh Bhargava; Peng Li; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Collaborative practice trends in US physician office visits: an analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), 2007-2016.

Authors:  Shahpar Najmabadi; Trenton J Honda; Roderick S Hooker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Treatment in a preventive cardiology clinic utilizing advanced practice providers effectively closes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk-management gaps among a primary-prevention population compared with a propensity-matched primary-care cohort: A team-based care model and its impact on lipid and blood pressure management.

Authors:  Emilio Fentanes; Anthony G Vande Hei; R Scott Holuby; Norma Suarez; Yousif Slim; Jennifer N Slim; Ahmad M Slim; Dustin Thomas
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Comprehensive Care Models for Cardiometabolic Disease.

Authors:  Cara Reiter-Brennan; Omar Dzaye; Dorothy Davis; Mike Blaha; Robert H Eckel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Clinician Care Team Composition and Health Care Utilization.

Authors:  Matthew E Bernard; Susan B Laabs; Darshan Nagaraju; Summer V Allen; Michael P Halasy; David R Rushlow; Gregory M Garrison; Julie A Maxson; Marc R Matthews; Gerald J Sobolik; Michelle A Lampman; Randy M Foss; Steven L Rosas; Tom D Thacher
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-04-08

6.  General and Unique Communication Skills Challenges for Advanced Practice Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Deborah Stein; Kerry Cannity; Richard Weiner; Shira Hichenberg; Angelina Leon-Nastasi; Smita Banerjee; Patricia Parker
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Continuity of care and outpatient management for patients with and at high risk for cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scientific statement from the American Society for Preventive Cardiology.

Authors:  Amit Khera; Seth J Baum; Ty J Gluckman; Martha Gulati; Seth S Martin; Erin D Michos; Ann Marie Navar; Pam R Taub; Peter P Toth; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Michael D Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  Evaluation of Aspirin and Statin Therapy Use and Adherence in Patients With Premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Dhruv Mahtta; David J Ramsey; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Khurram Nasir; Zainab Samad; David Aguilar; Hani Jneid; Christie M Ballantyne; Laura A Petersen; Salim S Virani
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03

9.  Association of Primary Care Team Composition and Clinician Burnout in a Primary Care Practice Network.

Authors:  Elliot J Bruhl; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Summer V Allen; Jennifer L Horn; Kurt B Angstman; Gregory M Garrison; Julie A Maxson; Debra K McCauley; Michelle A Lampman; Tom D Thacher
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.