Literature DB >> 27822870

A prospective study for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the Galaxy Fixation System.

R D'Ambrosi1,2, F Palumbo3, A Barbato3, R M Facchini3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal humerus represent a common problem in clinical practice; in particular for three- or four-part fractures, there is no consensus regarding which is the best treatment. The aim of our study was to report clinical and radiological outcomes in patients treated with the Galaxy Fixation System™ for a proximal humerus fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients of which 18 (56.25%) women, and 14 (43.75%) men suffering from proximal humerus fractures were treated using the Galaxy Fixation System™. Fractures were classified according to Neer and only patients with a three- or four-part fracture with two-thirds of the methaphysis intact were included. Clinical examination included the Constant-Murley score, UCLA score and Quick DASH evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. In addition, at the final follow-up, patients were asked to complete the SF-12 questionnaire. The humeral head-shaft angle was evaluated by radiographs the day after surgery, as well as after 12 and 24 months.
RESULTS: All 32 patients were available for the 6th, 12th and 24th month follow-up examination. The mean interval between trauma and surgery was 2.7 days (range 0-6 days). The period of hospital stay ranged from 2 to 8 days with an average of three days. The time of healing ranged from 4 to 10 weeks with an average of 7 weeks. The mean Constant score increased from 72.9 after 6 months to a mean of 82.8 at 12 months (p < 0.05) to 88.9 at 24 months (p < 0.05). UCLA score ranged from 27.5 at 6 months to 29.5 at 12 months (p < 0.05) and finally improved to 32.3 at final follow-up (p < 0.05). Quick DASH varied from 7.2 at 6 months after surgery to 5.2 at 12 months after surgery (p > 0.05) and reached the value of 3.1 after 24 months (p > 0.05). Mean Mental Component (MCS) resulted in a value of 48.1, while the Physical Component (PCS) was 52.7. The mean head-shaft angulation was 137.6° the day after surgery compared with 137.5° (p > 0.05) measured 12 months later, and 137.2° measured 24 months later (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Galaxy Fixation System™ is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures, providing an excellent outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External fixation; Neer classification; Proximal humerus fractures; Quality of life; Shoulder; Upper limb traumatology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27822870     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-016-0434-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  38 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  D Herscovici; D T Saunders; M P Johnson; R Sanders; T DiPasquale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique.

Authors:  G Konrad; J Bayer; P Hepp; C Voigt; H Oestern; M Kääb; C Luo; M Plecko; K Wendt; W Köstler; N Südkamp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the screw-tension band technique.

Authors:  C N Cornell; D Levine; M J Pagnani
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Brian D Solberg; Charles N Moon; Dennis P Franco; Guy D Paiement
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Kapandji pinning and tuberosities fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonnevialle; Aissa Ibnoulkatib; Pierre Mansat; Paul Bonnevialle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center.

Authors:  A Roux; L Decroocq; S El Batti; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; C Trojani; P Boileau; F de Peretti
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Early results for treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus using the PHILOS plate system.

Authors:  P Moonot; N Ashwood; M Hamlet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-09

8.  Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected].

Authors:  Kevin C Owsley; John T Gorczyca
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients.

Authors:  F Kralinger; R Schwaiger; M Wambacher; E Farrell; W Menth-Chiari; G Lajtai; C Hübner; H Resch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03

Review 10.  "Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail: our institutional experience and review of the literature".

Authors:  Peter V Giannoudis; Fragiskos N Xypnitos; Rozalia Dimitriou; Nick Manidakis; Roger Hackney
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

1.  External fixation can be an option for proximal humerus fractures Neer 3-4.

Authors:  Tommaso Maluta; Andrea Amarossi; Andrea Dorigotti; Francesco Bagnis; Elena Manuela Samaila; Lapo De Luca; Lorenzo Pezze; Bruno Magnan
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.