Literature DB >> 17883482

Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.

G Arturo Sánchez-Azofeifa1, Alexander Pfaff, Juan Andres Robalino, Judson P Boomhower.   

Abstract

We evaluated the intention, implementation, and impact of Costa Rica's program of payments for environmental services (PSA), which was established in the late 1990s. Payments are given to private landowners who own land in forest areas in recognition of the ecosystem services their land provides. To characterize the distribution of PSA in Costa Rica, we combined remote sensing with geographic information system databases and then used econometrics to explore the impacts of payments on deforestation. Payments were distributed broadly across ecological and socioeconomic gradients, but the 1997-2000 deforestation rate was not significantly lower in areas that received payments. Other successful Costa Rican conservation policies, including those prior to the PSA program, may explain the current reduction in deforestation rates. The PSA program is a major advance in the global institutionalization of ecosystem investments because few, if any, other countries have such a conservation history and because much can be learned from Costa Rica's experiences.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17883482     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  19 in total

1.  Land cover and landscape changes in Shaanxi Province during China's Grain for Green Program (2000-2010).

Authors:  Hai Chen; Jessica Marter-Kenyon; David López-Carr; Xiao-ying Liang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms.

Authors:  B Kelsey Jack; Carolyn Kousky; Katharine R E Sims
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ecosystem services of human-dominated watersheds and land use influences: a case study from the Dianchi Lake watershed in China.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Bo Li; Felix Müller; Weiping Chen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Do shade-grown coffee plantations pose a disease risk for wild birds?

Authors:  Sonia M Hernandez; Valerie E Peters; P Logan Weygandt; Carlos Jimenez; Pedro Villegas; Barry O'Connor; Michael J Yabsley; Maricarmen Garcia; Sylva M Riblet; C Ron Carroll
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 5.  Human-mediated impacts on biodiversity and the consequences for zoonotic disease spillover.

Authors:  Caroline K Glidden; Nicole Nova; Morgan P Kain; Katherine M Lagerstrom; Eloise B Skinner; Lisa Mandle; Susanne H Sokolow; Raina K Plowright; Rodolfo Dirzo; Giulio A De Leo; Erin A Mordecai
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 10.900

Review 6.  A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services.

Authors:  J K Summers; L M Smith; J L Case; R A Linthurst
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Accounting for nature's benefits: the dollar value of ecosystem services.

Authors:  David C Holzman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Frugivorous bats maintain functional habitat connectivity in agricultural landscapes but rely strongly on natural forest fragments.

Authors:  Simon P Ripperger; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Bernal Rodríguez-Herrera; Frieder Mayer; Marco Tschapka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluating heterogeneous conservation effects of forest protection in Indonesia.

Authors:  Payal Shah; Kathy Baylis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program.

Authors:  R A Arriagada; E O Sills; P J Ferraro; S K Pattanayak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.