Literature DB >> 27822110

The Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database.

Anna Lei Lamberg1, Henrik Sølvsten2, Ulrikke Lei3, Gabrielle Randskov Vinding3, Ida Marie Stender4, Gregor Borut Ernst Jemec5, Tine Vestergaard6, Henrik Thormann7, Merete Hædersdal8, Tomas Norman Dam9, Anne Braae Olesen10.   

Abstract

AIM OF DATABASE: The Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database was established in 2008. The aim of this database was to collect data on nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatment and improve its treatment in Denmark. NMSC is the most common malignancy in the western countries and represents a significant challenge in terms of public health management and health care costs. However, high-quality epidemiological and treatment data on NMSC are sparse. STUDY POPULATION: The NMSC database includes patients with the following skin tumors: basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease, and keratoacanthoma diagnosed by the participating office-based dermatologists in Denmark. MAIN VARIABLES: Clinical and histological diagnoses, BCC subtype, localization, size, skin cancer history, skin phototype, and evidence of metastases and treatment modality are the main variables in the NMSC database. Information on recurrence, cosmetic results, and complications are registered at two follow-up visits at 3 months (between 0 and 6 months) and 12 months (between 6 and 15 months) after treatment. DESCRIPTIVE DATA: In 2014, 11,522 patients with 17,575 tumors were registered in the database. Of tumors with a histological diagnosis, 13,571 were BCCs, 840 squamous cell carcinomas, 504 Bowen's disease, and 173 keratoakanthomas.
CONCLUSION: The NMSC database encompasses detailed information on the type of tumor, a variety of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and outcomes after treatment. The database has revealed that overall, the quality of care of NMSC in Danish dermatological clinics is high, and the database provides the necessary data for continuous quality assurance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basal cell carcinoma; epidemiology; nonmelanoma skin cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; treatment

Year:  2016        PMID: 27822110      PMCID: PMC5094616          DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S99464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 1179-1349            Impact factor:   4.790


Aim of database

The Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database is a publicly funded national clinical database. It was established in 2008 to monitor the quality of treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) by dermatologists in office-based settings and provide the necessary data for quality assurance and improvement. The concept of NMSC primarily refers to basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). These tumors are the most common malignancies in Denmark as well as in other Western countries.1,2 In spite of its low mortality, the high prevalence of NMSC makes it a significant challenge in terms of health management and health care costs.3 Care for NMSC is complex, with treatments provided in both hospitals and office-based settings. Several medical specialties may be involved in the treatment of NMSC, but the primary care providers are dermatologists, often within an office-based setting.3,4 A wide range of different treatments are used in the management of NMSC, eg, Mohs micrographic surgery, excision, cryotherapy, curettage, curettage combined with cautery, cryotherapy or laser, photodynamic therapy, radiotherapy, and imiquimod. Guidelines have been published by several organizations.5–8 The cost of treatment depends on treatment modality and setting (hospital or office based).3 However, little is known about the effectiveness of the most commonly used treatment modalities for SCC and BCC.7–10 The current knowledge comes predominantly from selected patient groups in studies often performed in single hospital centers.7–10 The management of NMSC differs between countries, and compared to other countries, curettage is used more frequently in Denmark10 and Mohs micrographic surgery is less often performed. Detailed data on NMSC and its treatment in routine clinical practice are important for surveillance, assessment of prognosis, quality assurance, and improvements.2,11,12 Such data can only be obtained from clinical databases, which are an attractive resource for epidemiological research.11,12 The NMSC database contains detailed data on NMSC diagnosed by the participating dermatologists, providing the necessary data for quality assurance and improvement. The aim of the NMSC database is to collect data on NMSC treatment and improve the treatment of NMSC in Denmark.

Study population

The NMSC database includes patients with the skin tumors BCC, SCC, Bowen’s disease, and keratoacanthoma diagnosed by the participating office-based dermatologists in Denmark. Between January 2008 and January 2011, the NMSC database was a regional database, incorporating data on NMSC patients diagnosed and treated at dermatology clinics in the Central and North Denmark Regions, which have a combined population of 1.8 million people that accounts for ∼30% of the Danish population. After approval by the Danish National Board of Health, the database started operating at a national (5.6 million people) level since February 2011. Collecting prospective data highly increases the workload of the registering clinics. In 2014, 11,522 patients with 17,575 tumors were registered in the database, and >72,000 tumors are now registered in the database. Completeness can be difficult to estimate precisely, because not all cases are sent for histopathology or registered in other registries. However, using the Danish Pathology Registry as a gold standard, the overall data completeness is 62%. Some clinics do not register. The completeness of the clinics registering in the database is 75%. The completeness of the individual variables is high, with only a few (median 2%) missing data (Table 1).
Table 1

Main variables in the Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database

Data quality, PPV% (95% CI)Missing data (%)
Clinical diagnosis0.4
Histological examination5
Histological diagnosis100 (95–100)5
Localization96 (89–99)0
Size85 (69–95)6
Skin cancer history97 (85–100)
Skin phototype
Evidence of metastases0
Treatment modality95 (87–99)
Recurrence100 (29–100)
Cosmetic result (physician)2
Cosmetic result (patient)11
Complications100 (16–100)1

Notes: PPV was not examined for variables not routinely registered in the medical records. Missing data are not calculated for all variables in the annual report and are missing in the table. – represents no data available. Republished with permission of Dove Medical Press, from Registration in the Danish Regional Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database: completeness of registration and accuracy of key variables, Lamberg AL, Cronin-Fenton D, Olesen AB, Clin Epidemiol, 2010;2:123–136,13 Copyright ©2010; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; CI, confidence interval.

A new online registration system is under construction. This system will have a special data capture technique, enabling an NMSC database reminder when an NMSC patient is in the clinic. Higher completeness will make the database a strong research tool. Extra efforts will be taken to enroll the clinics not registering in the database.

Main variables

Content of the NMSC database

The NMSC database operates via an Internet-based online registration system. A common interface form ensures standardized data collection. Data are entered into a computer-based data management system using the civil personal registry number (a unique ten-digit number assigned to each Danish citizen at birth or immigration). For each patient, the treating dermatologist enters detailed information on tumor, treatment, and evaluation after treatment. The exact localization of the tumor is marked on an anatomical position sketch. On the day of treatment, the treating dermatologist completes a questionnaire with detailed information on prognostic and treatment-related variables: clinical and histological diagnoses, clinical BCC subtype, localization, size, skin cancer history, skin phototype, evidence of metastases, and treatment modality. The histology report is added when it is received. If the patients have new tumors or recurrences later in life, these are added to the anatomical position sketch.

Data quality

We have previously examined the accuracy of the registrations in the NMSC database using medical record review as a gold standard. However, for the variable “histological diagnosis,” the Danish Pathology Registry was used as a gold standard.13 Overall, the accuracy of variables registered in the NMSC database was high.13 Positive predictive value (PPV) of histologically verified diagnoses was 100% using the Danish Pathology Registry as a gold standard. The PPV was 96% for localization, 85% for size, and 91% for the date of treatment. The PPV of treatment modality registered was 95%13 (Table 1).

Treatment quality

In order to monitor and facilitate improvement of treatment, six quality indicators have been chosen related to diagnosis, surveillance, and outcome of the treatment of NMSC, Bowen’s disease, and keratoacanthoma (Table 2).
Table 2

Quality indicators in the Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database

DiagnosticProportion of tumors undergoing histological examination
Follow-upProportion of patients attending follow-up visits at 3 months (0–6 months) and 12 months (6–15 months)
Recurrence-free survival at 3 monthsProportion of tumors without recurrence at 3 months of follow-up
Recurrence-free survival at 15 monthsProportion of tumors without recurrence at 15 months of follow-up
ComplicationsProportion of patients without complications in relation to treatment
Cosmetic resultsProportion of patients with a high score of satisfaction with the cosmetic result – evaluated by the patient Proportion of patients with a high score of satisfaction with the cosmetic result – evaluated by the treating physician
A report is published annually with data from the database showing data on all six quality indicators, with comments from both an epidemiologist and the steering committee of the NMSC database.

Follow-up

NMSC patients are scheduled for two follow-up visits, one at ∼3 months (between 0 and 6 months) and one at ∼12 months (between 6 and 15 months) after treatment. At these visits, information on recurrence, cosmetic result, and complications are entered in the database. In 2014, 54% of the patients were registered in the database at the first follow-up visit and 38% at the second follow-up visit.

Examples of research

The database was developed as a part of a PhD study.14 A validation study was conducted as a part of the PhD study.13 Data in the NMSC database are available for clinical research. It is possible to apply for data at the Danish Clinical Registries. The dermatologists registering in the database also have to apply for data for clinical research. Using the civil personal registry number, data on patients can be linked to other Danish medical and population-based databases. The Civil Registration System stores information from 1968 to present, including date of birth, change of address, date of emigration, and exact date of death.15 Currently, three studies are in process: regional variations in the treatment of NMSC; recurrence rate after treatment of NMSC in Denmark; and characteristics and treatments of keratoacanthoma. The management of NMSC differs not only between countries but also nationally. Study 1 describes the regional differences in the management of treatment. A wide range of treatments can be used in the treatment of a low-risk tumor according to national and international guidelines.5–8 Study 2 investigates the recurrence rates, providing real-world data to the understanding of recurrence risk associated with the available different treatment modalities adjusted for clinical characteristics of the tumors. Study 3 provides epidemiological data on keratoacanthomas, increasing our understanding of these tumors that resemble SCCs clinically and histologically but are self-limiting and benign.

Administrative issues and funding

Organization

The NMSC database was initiated in cooperation with the Danish Dermatological Society and the Danish Dermatologists’ Organization in 2007. The organization of the NMSC database consists of a steering committee of dermatologists from both hospitals and office-based clinics, as well as representatives from the Central Denmark Region administration. Currently, the steering committee of NMSC database has 12 members who administer the database. The development of the database was funded by the Danish Regional Collaboration of Specialists “Fonden for Faglig Udvikling af Speciallægepraksis” and “Aage Bangs Foundation.” The NMSC database is approved as a national clinical quality database. Patient privacy is ensured by encryption and password protection. The dermatologists only have access to their own data. The Danish Regional Funding for Clinical Databases funds the daily operation of the NMSC database. The database is operated by DAK-E (Danish Quality Unit of General Practice), and in future, DAK-E will fund the daily operation.

Conclusion

The NMSC database encompasses detailed information on the type of tumor, a variety of prognostic factors, treatment modality, and outcomes after treatment. The main strength of the NMSC database is the very detailed registration and the high accuracy of the registrations.13 To the best of our knowledge, comparable NMSC data have previously been registered only in smaller cohorts of patients for limited time periods. The value of the Danish NMSC database may prove to be even greater than NMSC databases of other countries because of the unique opportunity to link it with other Danish population-based and medical data sources. The care of NMSC is multidisciplinary, and a limitation of the database is that only dermatology clinics currently register in the database. A future goal is to cooperate with hospital departments in dermatology, plastic surgery, and oncology. So far the database has revealed that the overall quality of care of NMSC in Danish dermatological clinics is high, and the database will provide the necessary data for continuous quality assurance and improvement.
  12 in total

1.  Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.

Authors:  Jan Mainz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  [Non-melanoma skin cancer treated in a dermatologic practice. A quality control study].

Authors:  Karsten Veien; Niels K Veien; Thais Hattel; Grete Laurberg
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2002-09-09

Review 3.  Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

Authors:  F J Bath-Hextall; W Perkins; J Bong; H C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 4.  Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  N R Telfer; G B Colver; C A Morton
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R Motley; P Kersey; C Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 6.  The epidemiology of skin cancer.

Authors:  Thomas L Diepgen; V Mahler
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Registration in the Danish Regional Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database: completeness of registration and accuracy of key variables.

Authors:  Anna L Lamberg; Deirdre Cronin-Fenton; Anne B Olesen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in Europe: accurate and comparable data are needed for effective public health monitoring and interventions.

Authors:  M Trakatelli; C Ulrich; V del Marmol; S Euvrard; S Euvard; E Stockfleth; D Abeni
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Characteristics of office-based visits for skin cancer. Dermatologists have more experience than other physicians in managing malignant and premalignant skin conditions.

Authors:  E S Smith; S R Feldman; A B Fleischer; B Leshin; A McMichael
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.398

10.  Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiologyA study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use.

Authors:  H T Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Risk Saf Med       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.