| Literature DB >> 27821814 |
Yanhui Shi1, Weiyu Zhai2, Bin Wang3, Dongmei Zhao1, He Jin4, Yuefei Wang3, Jidong Zhang1, Hongjun An1, Zhongze Fu1, Kun Zhao3, Changzhu Lu3.
Abstract
Backgrounds and Objective: Mounting evidence suggests that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) plays a central role in anti-virus and tumor defense. To test whether genetic variation in HLA-DRB1 gene, a key component of HLA system, can predict its predisposition to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we thereby conducted an association study by genotyping 8 nonsynonymous polymorphisms in HLA-DRB1 gene among 257 HCC patients and 264 controls.Entities:
Keywords: Han Chinese; genetic predisposition; hepatocellular carcinoma; human leukocyte antigen; non-synonymous polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27821814 PMCID: PMC5348366 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
The baseline characteristics of study participants
| Characteristics | Patients | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 257 | 264 | |
| Age (years) | 58.75 (10.32) | 65.14 (9.57) | < 0.001 |
| Gender | < 0.001 | ||
| Males | 204 | 171 | |
| Females | 53 | 93 | |
| Smoking | 79.38% | 64.77% | < 0.001 |
| Drinking | 36.19% | 30.77% | 0.274 |
| Diabetes | 8.53% | 11.22% | 0.450 |
| Hepatitis infection | 68.87% | 7.14% | < 0.001 |
| AFP (ng/mL) ( | 3.18 (1.79, 56.54) | n.a. | |
| GI (U/mL) ( | 9.76 (4.47, 20.61) | n.a. | |
| CEA (ng/mL) ( | 2.21 (1.26, 3.96) | n.a. |
Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; GI, glucose intolerance; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; n.a., data not available. Continuous data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median (inter-quartile range: 25th percentile to 75th percentile). Categorical data are expressed as percentages. Two-group comparisons were conducted by the t-test for continuous data and by the χ2-test for categorical data.
The comparison of the genotypes and alleles of eight study polymorphisms between HCC patients and controls
| Polymorphisms | Class | WW | WM | MM | M | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs199514452 | AA | AT | TT | T | |||
| c.31T > A | Patients | 170 | 78 | 9 | 0.847 | 18.66% | 0.837 |
| Controls | 175 | 82 | 7 | 18.18% | |||
| rs201540428 | TT | TA | AA | A | |||
| c.34A > T | Patients | 163 | 84 | 10 | 0.754 | 20.23% | 0.447 |
| Controls | 159 | 93 | 12 | 22.16% | |||
| rs201614260 | CC | CG | GG | G | |||
| c.84G > C | Patients | 218 | 39 | 0 | 0.043 | 7.59% | 0.039 |
| Controls | 240 | 24 | 0 | 4.55% | |||
| rs17879702 | CC | CT | TT | T | |||
| c.133C > T | Patients | 201 | 52 | 4 | 0.021 | 11.67% | 0.007 |
| Controls | 230 | 32 | 2 | 6.82% | |||
| rs17880292 | GG | GA | AA | A | |||
| c.256G > A | Patients | 215 | 42 | 0 | 0.177 | 8.17% | 0.673 |
| Controls | 221 | 39 | 4 | 8.90% | |||
| rs17879599 | GG | GC | CC | C | |||
| c.299G > C | Patients | 129 | 113 | 15 | < 0.001 | 27.82% | < 0.001 |
| Controls | 177 | 76 | 11 | 18.56% | |||
| rs17424145 | TT | TC | CC | C | |||
| c.341T > C | Patients | 227 | 30 | 0 | 0.311 | 5.84% | 0.277 |
| Controls | 241 | 23 | 0 | 4.36% | |||
| rs35445101 | AA | AG | GG | G | |||
| c.790T > C | Patients | 213 | 43 | 1 | 0.247 | 8.75% | 0.193 |
| Controls | 210 | 49 | 5 | 11.17% |
Abbreviations: WW, homozygous wild genotype; WM, heterozygous genotype; MM, homozygous mutant genotype; M, mutant allele. P was calculated by the *Fisher's exact test for genotype comparisons and by the χ2-test for allele comparisons between patients and controls.
The prediction for HCC risk conferred by eight study polymorphisms with and without adjustment under both additive and dominant models
| Polymorphisms | Additive model | Dominant model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| rs199514452 | 1.03 (0.75–1.42) | 0.835 | 1.08 (0.69–1.67) | 0.624 | 1.01 (0.70–1.45) | 0.973 | 1.06 (0.64–1.76) | 0.708 |
| rs201540428 | 0.89 (0.66–1.20) | 0.444 | 0.90 (0.62–1.30) | 0.578 | 0.87 (0.61–1.24) | 0.453 | 0.91 (0.58–1.42) | 0.672 |
| rs201614260 | 1.79 (1.04–3.07) | 0.035 | 1.99 (1.00–3.96) | 0.051 | 1.79 (1.04–3.07) | 0.035 | 1.99 (1.00–3.96) | 0.051 |
| rs17879702 | 1.78 (1.16–2.73) | 0.009 | 2.12 (1.20–4.02) | 0.004 | 1.88 (1.18–3.00) | 0.008 | 2.51 (1.34–4.69) | 0.004 |
| rs17880292 | 0.91 (0.59–1.41) | 0.674 | 0.86 (0.51–1.44) | 0.563 | 1.00 (0.63–1.60) | 0.987 | 0.96 (0.55–1.69) | 0.899 |
| rs17879599 | 1.72 (1.27–2.32) | < 0.001 | 1.63 (1.12–2.39) | 0.012 | 2.00 (1.42–2.88) | < 0.001 | 1.89 (1.21–2.96) | 0.005 |
| rs17424145 | 1.38 (0.78–2.46) | 0.265 | 1.32 (0.64–2.76) | 0.453 | 1.38 (0.78–2.46) | 0.265 | 1.32 (0.64–2.76) | 0.453 |
| rs35445101 | 0.77 (0.51–1.15) | 0.198 | 0.96 (0.57–1.62) | 0.893 | 0.80 (0.52–1.25) | 0.331 | 1.02 (0.58–1.77) | 0.958 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
P was calculated in a multivariate binary Logistic regression model after adjusting for age, gender, smoking, drinking and hepatitis infection.
Figure 1The linkage disequilibrium profiles of eight study polymorphisms
The number in diamond represents the 100 × D' in the form of standard color scheme. The pink box denotes D' < 1 and LOD ≥ 2, and the while box denotes D' < 1 and LOD < 2.
The frequencies of estimated haplotypes between patients and controls and their risk prediction for HCC risk with and without adjusting for potential confounders
| Haplotype | Patients | Controls | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-T-C-C-G-G-T-A | 0.3589 | 0.4028 | 0.013 | Reference group | Reference group | ||
| T-T-C-C-G-G-T-A | 0.0603 | 0.0926 | 0.265 | 0.85 (0.46–1.57) | 0.609 | 1.00 (0.41–2.45) | 0.983 |
| A-A-C-C-G-G-T-A | 0.0525 | 0.0861 | 0.066 | 0.83 (0.43–1.64) | 0.599 | 0.85 (0.47–1.81) | 0.617 |
| A-T-C-C-G-C-T-A | 0.0682 | 0.0467 | 0.192 | 2.19 (1.09–4.39) | 0.028 | 1.88 (0.96–3.37) | 0.174 |
| A-T-C-T-G-C-T-A | 0.0672 | 0.0502 | 0.003 | 1.78 (0.95–3.33) | 0.072 | 2.72 (1.24–5.78) | 0.004 |
| A-T-C-C-A-G-T-A | 0.0458 | 0.0501 | 0.658 | 0.85 (0.41–1.79) | 0.672 | 0.83 (0.33–1.77) | 0.606 |
| A-A-C-C-G-G-T-G | 0.0280 | 0.0525 | 0.201 | 0.56 (0.24–1.32) | 0.187 | 0.73 (0.25–1.99) | 0.545 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. For each haplotype, alleles are arranged in order of rs199514452, rs201540428, rs201614260, rs17879702, rs17880292, rs17879599, rs17424145 and rs35445101.
P was calculated in a multivariate binary Logistic regression model after adjusting for age, gender, smoking, drinking and hepatitis infection.
Genetic score analysis of eight study polymorphisms and the risk prediction for HCC with and without adjustment
| Genetic score | Patients | Controls | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartiles: | ||||||
| 1–4 | 96 (37.36%) | 130 (49.24%) | Reference group | Reference group | ||
| 5 | 68 (26.46%) | 64 (24.24%) | 1.44 (0.93–2.21) | 0.098 | 1.40 (0.82–2.39) | 0.211 |
| 6 | 51 (19.84%) | 42 (15.91%) | 1.64 (1.01–2.67) | 0.045 | 1.52 (0.82–2.80) | 0.184 |
| 7–9 | 42 (16.35%) | 28 (10.60%) | 2.03 (1.18–3.51) | 0.011 | 2.41 (1.18–4.92) | 0.016 |
| Per score increment | 1.23 (1.09–1.39) | 0.001 | 1.24 (1.07–1.44) | 0.005 | ||
| Per quartile increment | 1.27 (1.08–1.50) | 0.004 | 1.30 (1.06–1.60) | 0.013 | ||
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
P was calculated in a multivariate binary Logistic regression model after adjusting for age, gender, smoking, drinking and hepatitis infection.