| Literature DB >> 27821431 |
Nanna Torpe1, Steffen Nørgaard1,2, Anette M Høye1, Roger Pocock3,2.
Abstract
Nogo-A is a membrane-bound protein that functions to inhibit neuronal migration, adhesion, and neurite outgrowth during development. In the mature nervous system, Nogo-A stabilizes neuronal wiring to inhibit neuronal plasticity and regeneration after injury. Here, we show that RET-1, the sole Nogo-A homolog in Caenorhabditis elegans, is required to control developmental wiring of a specific subset of neurons. In ret-1 deletion mutant animals, specific ventral nerve cord axons are misguided where they fail to respect the ventral midline boundary. We found that ret-1 is expressed in multiple neurons during development, and, through mosaic analysis, showed that ret-1 controls axon guidance in a cell-autonomous manner. Finally, as in mammals, ret-1 regulates ephrin expression, and dysregulation of the ephrin ligand VAB-2 is partially responsible for the ret-1 mutant axonal defects. Together, our data present a previously unidentified function for RET-1 in the nervous system of C. elegans.Entities:
Keywords: C. elegans; Nogo-A; axon guidance; ephrin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27821431 PMCID: PMC5223509 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genetics ISSN: 0016-6731 Impact factor: 4.562
Figure 1The C. elegans Nogo-A/RTN4 homolog RET-1 is expressed in the nervous system. (A) Alignment of the C-terminus of C. elegans RET-1 with the Nogo-A/RTN4 homologs of mouse, rat and human. The RHD is highlighted in gray. Alignment was generated using ClustalW. (B) The ret-1 locus comprises eight isoforms encoding predicted proteins of 204–3303 amino acids. All isoforms harbor an RHD in their C-termini. The deletion alleles (marked by red bars) used in this study (gk242 and tm390) both affect the RHD and produce frameshifts. The DNA sequence that encodes the RHD is marked by a black bar at the C terminus. We used ret-1 isoform g.2 as a model to study the ret-1 expression pattern and function. The ret-1 isoform g.2 5000 bp promoter used to report expression (ret-1::gfp - now written as ret-1::gfp) is shown below the locus. (C–G) Expression of the transcriptional ret-1::gfp reporter during embryonic and young adult stages. (C–F) At the bean stage, ret-1::gfp is diffusely expressed (D); however, robust expression is observed in the twofold stage of the embryo in two head neurons (F). (C, E) DIC images of the fluorescent images shown in (D) and (F). Postembryonically, ret-1::gfp is highly expressed in embryonic motor neurons [eMNs, white arrowheads in (G) and (H)] and hermaphrodite-specific neurons [HSNs, red arrowheads in (G)], the head [red arrowhead in (H) points to the nerve ring], and the tail. All images are lateral views, except the ventral view in (G). Anterior to the left. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 2ret-1 acts in neurons to control HSN axon guidance. (A) Schematic of HSN anatomy in adults (top). HSNs migrate during embryogenesis to the midbody. During larval stages, the HSN left and right axons extend into the vulva, and subsequently into the VNC, where they terminate at the nerve ring in the head. HSN anatomy of wild-type (center) and ret-1(gk242) (bottom) animals. HSN cell bodies in ret-1(gk242) animals migrate to their correct position just posterior to the vulva. However, axonal defects were observed where one axon crosses over to the contralateral side (red arrowhead). The vulva is marked with a red asterisk. Ventral view, anterior to the left. HSN development was studied using a tph-1::gfp transgene (zdIs13). Bar, 20 μm. (B) Quantification of HSN axonal crossover defects in two independent ret-1 deletion mutants: gk242 and tm390. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test or Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, where applicable. n > 50, ****P < 0.0001. (C) Transgenic expression of ret-1 genomic DNA rescues HSN defects of ret-1(gk242) mutant animals, whereas transgenic overexpression of ret-1 genomic DNA in wild type animals does not induce defects. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test or Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, where applicable. n > 50, ****P < 0.001. n.s., not significant; # refers to independent transgenic lines. (D) Transgenic expression of ret-1 isoform g.2 cDNA in the nervous system, using the panneuronal rgef-1 promoter, rescues HSN defects of ret-1(gk242) mutant animals. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test or Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, where applicable. n > 50, ****P < 0.0001; # refers to independent transgenic lines.
Quantification of neuroanatomical scoring in wild type and ret-1(gk242) mutant animals
| Neurons Examined (Marker Used) | % Defective Animals | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Type | |||
| Interneurons | |||
| PVQ interneurons ( | 6 | 16 | **** |
| PVP interneurons ( | 6 | 17 | **** |
| Motor Neurons | |||
| HSN motor neurons ( | |||
| Axon guidance | 8 | 41 | **** |
| Cell migration | 5 | 6 | n.s. |
| L/R choice | |||
| D motor neuron ( | 11 | 37 | **** |
| DA/DB MN ( | 9 | 15 | n.s. |
| Defasciculation | |||
| Ventral nerve cord | |||
| D motor neuron ( | 0 | 33 | **** |
| DA/DB MN ( | 0 | 0 | n.s. |
| Mechanosensory Neurons ( | |||
| PLM | 6 | 11 | n.s. |
| ALM | 2 | 3 | n.s. |
| PVM | 5 | 2 | n.s. |
| AVM | 0 | 11 | **** |
We used a panel of gfp reporter strains that highlight specific neurons in wild type and ret-1(gk242) mutant animals. The wiring of the wild type nervous system was used as control when scoring the axon guidance defects in ret-1(gk242) mutants. Animals were scored 1-day post-L4 on ≥2 consecutive days, n ≥ 50 animals.
PVQ interneurons were scored defective when PVQ right or PVQ left axons crossed over to the contralateral side.
PVP interneurons were scored defective when PVP right or PVP left axons crossed over to the contralateral side.
HSN motor neurons were scored defective for axon crossover defects and cell migration. Axon guidance was scored as for the interneurons above. Wild type levels of HSN cell migration defects were observed in ret-1(gk242) mutant animals.
Left/right asymmetry was scored as defective when the commissures extended to the inappropriate side.
Fasciculation of the dorsal nerve cord and VNC were scored as defective when ≥2 processes were separated from the fascicle.
Touch cells: PLMs and ALMs were scored defective when synapses from the PLMs or ALMs failed to extend to the VNC. The AVM and PVM neurons were scored defective when the cell body position was anteriorly displaced. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test or Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, where applicable. n > 50, ****P < 0.0001. n.s., not significant.
Figure 3ret-1 is required for correct guidance of a specific classes of axons at the ventral midline. (A–D) Cell type specific gfp reporters were utilized to investigate the neuroanatomy of wild-type and ret-1(gk242) mutant animals. Upper panels show a graphical view of wild-type morphology of each neuronal class (A–C) and the hypodermis (D). Representative images of wild-type and ret-1(gk242) mutant animals are shown in the center and bottom images, respectively. (A, B) The PVQ and PVP axons of ret-1(gk242) animals fail to respect the midline by crossing over to the contralateral axon fascicle. Expanded view is shown to indicate the crossover event. Neurons were visualized using the hdIs26 transgenic strain. (C) Commissural D-type motor neurons showed defective left/right asymmetry where the commissures extended to the inappropriate side. Neurons were visualized with the oxIs12 transgenic strain. Defective axonal patterning is marked with red arrowheads. (D) The general structure of the hypodermis appears normal in ret-1 mutant animals. Hypodermal cell morphology was observed using the jcIs1 transgenic strain.
Double mutant analysis between ret-1(gk242) and known axon guidance regulators
| HSN Guidance Defects (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Wild type ( | 8 | |
| 41 | ||
| 97 | ||
| 95 | n.s. | |
| 91 | ||
| 100 | n.s. | |
| 61 | ||
| 72 | n.s. | |
| 21 | ||
| 42 | n.s. | |
| 44 | ||
| 49 | n.s. | |
| 26 | ||
| 36 | n.s. | |
| 20 | ||
| 23 | <0.0001 | |
| 17 | ||
| 20 | <0.0001 |
Quantification of HSN axonal cross-over defects in the indicated strains. VNC defects of HSN axons in ret-1(gk242) animals are not suppressed by mutations in conserved axon guidance pathways: unc-6 and unc-40 (netrin); slt-1 and sax-3 (Slit-Robo). The penetrance of the unc-6 and unc-40 single mutants is high; therefore, only suppression of these defects in the ret-1 double mutants would be possible to detect. Such suppression of ret-1 mutant defects was observed in two alleles of the VAB-2 ephrin ligand. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, and statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. n > 50, n.s., not significant.
Figure 4VAB-2/ephrin expression is altered in ret-1 mutant animals, and causes HSN axon guidance defects. (A) qRT-PCR showing the expression levels of vab-2 in wild-type and ret-1(gk242) mutant animals. mRNA expression of vab-2 is increased in ret-1 mutants compared to wild type. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ****P < 0.0001. (B) HSN axon guidance defects of ret-1 mutant animals are suppressed by mutations in the ephrin ligand VAB-2 but not by the Eph receptor VAB-1. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. n > 50, ****P < 0.0001, n.s., not significant.