Literature DB >> 27819161

Performance of the pegfilgrastim on-body injector as studied with placebo buffer in healthy volunteers.

Rajeshree S Joshi1, Ogo I Egbuna1, Alex S Cairns2, Michael J Friedman3, Bassam Abosaleem1, Maureen T Reiner4, Phuong Khanh Morrow5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The pegfilgrastim on-body injector (OBI) is a single-use, disposable, battery-powered injector that is designed to automatically deliver a single subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim beginning approximately 27 hours after activation and continuing over approximately 45 minutes. In this open-label study, we assessed performance of the OBI delivering placebo buffer in healthy volunteers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy men and women aged 18-55 years, with a body mass index of 18-35 kg/m2, were enrolled. OBIs were activated by filling them with placebo buffer, and two injectors were applied concurrently to each subject: one to the abdomen and one to the back of the upper arm. Subjects were monitored for substantial leakage during and after administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint of the study was successful delivery of placebo buffer based on a composite of the following: no substantial leakage during or after administration, green status light indicator on the injector during and after administration, and fill indicator bar at the empty position after administration. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Of the 150 subjects enrolled, 149 (99.3%) completed the study. Study subjects were 48.0% men, and 52.0% women; 47.3% were white, 35.3% black or African American, 12.7% Asian, and 4.7% other. Mean (SD) age was 35.9 (10.8) years. Of the 297 total deliveries, 292 (98.3%) were considered successful: 147/149 (98.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.2%-99.6%) to the abdomen and 145/148 (98.0%; 95% CI: 94.2%-99.3%) to the back of the upper arm. Five deliveries were considered unsuccessful: two due to hazard alarms, and three due to substantial leakage. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (in >2% of subjects overall) by preferred term were medical device site reaction (20.7%), catheter-site hemorrhage (8.7%), and headache (3.3%). No serious AEs were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The pegfilgrastim OBI was well tolerated, and deliveries of placebo buffer were successful 98.3% of the time. The generalizability of these results may be limited by the conduct of this study in healthy subjects in a controlled environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; injector performance; on-body injector; pegfilgrastim

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27819161     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1257980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

1.  Administration options for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: patient and physician preferences from a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Brennan Mange; Mark A Price; Daniel Wolin; Mark Bensink; James A Kaye; David Chandler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Development and content validation of the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (SEQ-G-CSF).

Authors:  Aylin Yucel; Anne Skalicky; Olabimpe Ruth Eseyin; Emre Yucel; Rajesh Belani; Mark Bensink
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-18

3.  Formative Study on the Wearability and Usability of a Large-Volume Patch Injector.

Authors:  Jakob Lange; Andreas Schneider; Christoph Jordi; Michael Lau; Timothy Disher
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-11-16

Review 4.  Pegfilgrastim Biosimilars in US Supportive Oncology: A Narrative Review of Administration Options and Economic Considerations to Maximize Patient Benefit.

Authors:  Sophia Z Humphreys; Robert B Geller; Paul Walden
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2022-09-16

5.  Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.

Authors:  Jolly Patel; Rebecca Ann Rainess; Miranda J Benfield; Kate M L Rogers; Donald C Moore; Chris Larck; Justin R Arnall
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-08-02

6.  Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael Metz; Dieter Semsek; Gunther Rogmans; Ulrich Hutzschenreuter; Thomas Fietz; Johanna Harde; Stefan Zacharias; Carsten Hielscher; Andreas Lorenz; Mark-Oliver Zahn; Dagmar Guth; Steffen Liebers; Michael Berghorn; Sina Grebhardt; Christiane D Matillon; Gerlinde Egerer; Karin Potthoff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.603

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.