Literature DB >> 27818774

Description of Clostridium phoceensis sp. nov., a new species within the genus Clostridium.

M Hosny1, S Benamar1, G Durand1, N Armstrong1, C Michelle1, F Cadoret1, B La Scola1, N Cassir1.   

Abstract

Clostridium phoceensis sp. nov., strain GD3T (= CSUR P1929 = DSM 100334) is the type strain of C. phoceensis sp. nov., a new species within the genus Clostridium. This strain was isolated from the gut microbiota of a 28-year-old healthy French man. C. phoceensis is a Gram-negative, spore-forming, nonmotile, strictly anaerobic bacterium. We describe its complete genome sequence and annotation, together with its phenotypic characteristics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobe; Clostridium phoceensis; culturomics; gut microbiota; taxono-genomics

Year:  2016        PMID: 27818774      PMCID: PMC5078575          DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Introduction

Human adult gut microbiota is estimated to consist of up to 100 trillion microorganisms, comprising at least 500 different species, mostly anaerobic bacteria [1]. Although the advent of modern molecular microbiological methods has expanded the degree of bacterial detection from stool samples, it does not allow for the phenotypic description of new living species [2]. Consequently, there has been renewed interest in culture methods [3]. A new taxonomic approach known as taxonogenomics has recently been proposed to describe new isolated bacterial species [4]. This polyphasic strategy combines phenotypic characteristics, the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) spectrum, and the analysis and comparison of the complete genome sequence. Since the creation of the genus Clostridium in 1880, more than 200 species have been described [5]. While species belonging to the family Clostridiaceae are mainly associated with the commensal digestive flora of mammals and can be commonly found in the environment, some are major human pathogens, including toxigenic Clostridium botulinum, Peptoclostridium difficile, Clostridium tetani and Clostridium perfringens [6]. We propose Clostridium phoceensis sp. nov., strain GD3T (= CSUR P1929 = DSM 100334) as the type strain of C. phoceensis sp. nov., a new species within the genus Clostridium. This strain was isolated from the gut microbiota of a 28-year-old healthy French man as part of a culturomics study aiming at individually cultivating all bacterial species from a stool sample. Here we describe the characteristics of C. phoceensis sp. nov. strain GD3T, including its phenotype and genome sequence.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

The stool sample was taken from a 28-year-old healthy French man. The sample was collected as part of a research study on the human gut microbiota. The study was approved by the Institut Fédératif de Recherche 48 (agreement no. 09-022, Marseille, France), and the patient's consent was obtained. The sample was stored at −80°C in La Timone Hospital (Marseille, France).

Strain isolation and identification (MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA sequencing)

The faecal sample was treated using the concept of culturomics [7]. The colonies obtained were identified using MALDI-TOF MS [8], [9] (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) and analysed using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker), leading to the protein spectrum being obtained. A score under 1.7 did not enable any identification. Subsequently, 16S rRNA was sequenced and the sequence was matched using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) against the National Center for Biotechnology Information database [10]. DNA was extracted using the EZ1 Tissue Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and sequences were aligned using ChromasPro 1.6 (Technelysium, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia).

Growth conditions

The growth condition of the strain was determined by testing different temperatures and atmospheres. Five growth temperatures (ambient, 28, 37, 45 and 56°C) were tested under anaerobic (GENbag anaer) microaerophilic atmospheres (GENbag microer) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and aerobic condition on 5% sheep's blood agar (bioMérieux). Colonies were obtained after thermal shock for 20 minutes at 80°C in an anaerobic blood culture bottle (Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F) supplemented with 5% sheep's blood at 37°C.

Phenotypic, biochemical and antibiotic susceptibility tests

Gram staining, motility, catalase and oxidase were determined as described by Lagier et al. [3]. Sporulation was tested using a thermal shock on bacterial colonies (diluted in phosphate-buffered saline) for 10 minutes at 80°C. The biochemical characteristics were tested using API 50CH, API ZYM and API 20A strips (bioMérieux). Antibiotic susceptibility referred to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 2015 recommendations.

Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)

FAME analysis was performed by GC/MS. Two samples were prepared with 2 mg of bacterial biomass from several culture plates. Two samples were prepared with approximately 2 mg of bacterial biomass per tube collected from several culture plates. FAMEs were prepared as described by Sasser (http://www.midi-inc.com/pdf/MIS_Technote_101.pdf). GC/MS analyses were carried out as described by Dione et al. [11]. Briefly, FAMEs were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500-SQ8S; PerkinElmer, Courtaboeuf, France). A spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated using the Standard Reference Database 1A (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and the FAME mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).

Microscopy

Individual cells of C. phoceensis strain GD3T were captured using a Tecnai G20 electron microscopy (FEI Company, Limeil-Brevannes, France). A Color Gram 2 Kit (bioMérieux) was used to perform the Gram coloration observed with a 100× oil-immersion objective lens using the DM1000 photonic microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) [12], [13].

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing because it had been isolated from a healthy person for the first time and on the basis of its 16S rRNA similarity, phylogenetic position and phenotypic differences with other members of the genus Clostridia. The GenBank accession number is CVUG01000000 and consists of 10 scaffolds with a total of 16 contigs [14].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genomic DNA of Clostridium phoceensis GD3T was sequenced on the MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the mate-pair strategy. The gDNA was barcoded in order to be mixed with 11 other projects using the Nextera mate-pair sample prep kit (Illumina). The mate-pair library was prepared with 1.5 μg of genomic DNA using the Nextera Mate-Pair Illumina guide. The gDNA sample was simultaneously fragmented and tagged using a mate-pair junction adapter. The pattern of the fragmentation was validated on an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DNA 7500 lab chip. The DNA fragments ranged in size from 1 to 10 kb, with an optimal size of 4.490 kb. No size selection was performed, and only 600 ng of tagmented fragments were circularized. The circularized DNA was mechanically sheared to small fragments with an optimal size of 938 bp on the Covaris S2 device in microtubes (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). The library profile was visualized on a High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer LabChip (Agilent Technologies), and the final library concentration was measured at 4.457 nmol/L. The libraries were normalized at 2 nM and pooled. After a denaturation step and dilution at 15 pM, the pool of libraries was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and sequencing run were performed in a single 39-hour run in a 2 × 251 bp; 6.1 Gb of total information was obtained from a 653K/mm2 cluster density, with a cluster passing quality control filters of 96.1% (12 031 000 clusters). Within this run, the index representation for C. phoceensis GD3T was determined to 9.32%. The 1 121 200 paired reads were filtered according to the read qualities. These reads were trimmed, then assembled by SPDES software. Finally, the draft genome of C. phoceensis GD3T consisted of ten scaffolds with 16 contigs and generated a genome size of 3.4 Mb with 59.32% G+C content.

Genome annotation

Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [15] with default parameters, although the predicted ORFs were excluded if they spanned a sequencing gap region. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the GenBank database [16] and the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) databases using BLASTP. The tRNA genes were found using the tRNAScanSE tool [17], while RNAmmer [18] was used to find ribosomal RNAs and BLASTn against the GenBank database. Lipoprotein signal peptides and the number of transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [19] and TMHMM [20] respectively. Artemis [21] was used for data management, and DNA Plotter [22] was used to visualize genomic features. To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level, we used homemade average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences (AGIOS) software [4].

Results

Strain isolation, identification and phylogeny

MALDI-TOF MS failed to identify the strain GD3T, so its mass spectrum was added to the Bruker database (Fig. 1). To improve identification, 16S rRNA sequencing was performed, and the access number in 16S rRNA EMBL-EBI (European Molecular Biology Laboratory–European Bioinformatics Institute) was assigned as LN846907. The highest value of nucleotide sequence similarity was observed with Flavonifractor plautii (97%), the phylogenetically closest species.
Fig. 1

Reference mass spectrum (matrix-assisted desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry) from Clostridium phoceensis strain GD3T.

Phenotypic and biochemical characterization

C. phoceensis strain GD3T is a Gram-negative (Fig. 2), spore-forming, nonmotile, strictly anaerobic bacterium that has no catalase and oxidase activities, measuring 1.8 μm in length and 0.5 μm in diameter (Fig. 3). The sporulation test was positive; the organism grows at 45°C in anaerobic conditions. Using the API ZYM gallery, C. phoceensis exhibits esterase (C4), phosphatase acid, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and β-glucosidase activities. When using the API 20A gallery, a positive reaction was only observed for d-glucose (Table 1).
Fig. 2

Gram staining of Clostridium phoceensis strain GD3T.

Fig. 3

Electron microscopy of Clostridium phoceensis strain GD3T.

Table 1

Classification, general features and biochemical tests of Clostridium phoceensis strain GD3T

PropertyTerm
Current classificationDomain: Bacteria
Phylum: Firmicutes
Class: Clostridia
Order: Clostridiales
Family: Clostriadaceae
Genus: Clostridium
Species: Clostridium phoceensis
Type strain: GD3
Gram stainNegative
Cell shapeBacillus
Cell diameter (μm)0.5 μm
Cell length1.8 μm
MotilityNo
SporulationYes
Temperature rangeMesophilic
Production of:
 Alkaline phosphataseNo
 CatalaseNo
 OxidaseNo
 Nitrate reductaseNo
 UreaseNo
 β-GalactosidaseNo
 N-acetyl-glucosamineNo
 EsteraseYes
Acid from:
 l-ArabinoseNo
 RiboseNo
 MannoseNo
 MannitolNo
 SucroseNo
 d-GlucoseYes
 d-FructoseNo
 d-MaltoseNo
 d-LactoseNo
HabitatHuman
Of the antibiotics tested, C. phoceensis was found to be sensitive to amoxicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, imipenem, doripenem and ciprofloxacin.

Predominant cellular fatty acids

The predominant cellular fatty acids of C. phoceensis strain GD3T are hexadecanoic acid (16:0; 33.1 ± 1.7%), 9-octadecenoic acid (18:1n9; 24.3 ± 0.6%), octadecanoic acid (18:0; 20.0 ± 0.1%), 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (18:2n6; 8.6 ± 0.1%), 11-octadecenoic acid (18:1n7; 5.5 ± 0.5%), tetradecanoic acid (14:0; 4.7 ± 0.8%) and trace amounts (less than 1%) of heptadecanoic acid, 9-hexadecenoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-hexadecanoic acid, 10-heptadecenoic acid, 13-methyl-tetradecanoic acid and 12-methyl-tetradecanoic acid (Table 2).
Table 2

Cellular fatty acid composition (%) of Clostridium phoceensis strain GD3T

Fatty acidNameMean relative %a
16:0Hexadecanoic acid33.1 ± 1.7
18:1n99-Octadecenoic acid24.3 ± 0.6
18:0Octadecanoic acid20.0 ± 0.1
18:2n69,12-Octadecadienoic acid8.6 ± 0.1
18:1n711-Octadecenoic acid5.5 ± 0.5
14:0Tetradecanoic acid4.7 ± 0.8
17:0Heptadecanoic acidTR
16:1n79-Hexadecenoic acidTR
15:0Pentadecanoic acidTR
17:0 iso15-methyl-Hexadecanoic acidTR
17:0 anteiso14-methyl-Hexadecanoic acidTR
17:1n710-Heptadecenoic acidTR
15:0 iso13-Methyl-tetradecanoic acidTR
15:0 anteiso12-Methyl-tetradecanoic acidTR

Genome properties

A phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Clostridium phoceensis GD3T relative to other type strains within the order Clostridiales is provided in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Phylogenetic tree highlighting position of Clostridium phoceensis GD3T relative to other type strains within Clostridiales order. GenBank accession numbers are indicated. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic inferences were obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA 4 software [23]. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 500 times to generate majority consensus tree. Scale bar represents 5% nucleotide sequence divergence. Rubidus massiliensis was used as outgroup.

The genome of the C. phoceensis strain GD3T is 3 453 562 bp long with 59.32% G+C content. A total of 3320 genes were predicted, of which 3264 were protein-coding genes and 56 were RNA genes (three genes are 5S rRNA, one gene is 16S rRNA, one gene is 23S rRNA and 51 genes are TRNA genes). A total of 1967 genes (60.26%) were assigned a putative function. A total of 227 genes (6.95%) were identified as ORFans. The remaining genes (28.92%) were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3 and Fig. 5. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4 and Fig. 6.
Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of genome

AttributeGenome (total)
Value% of totala
Genome size (bp)3 453 562100
DNA coding region (bp)2 924 78584.68
DNA G+C content (bp)2 044 36659.31
Total genes3320100
rRNA50.136
tRNA510.116
Protein-coding genes326498.31
Genes with function prediction311117.02
Genes assigned to COGs253457.39
Pseudo genes621.86
Genes in internal clusters106031.92
Genes with Pfam domains281784
Genes with signal peptides41412.68
Genes with transmembrane helices72222.12
ORFan genes2276.95
CRISPR repeats140.02

COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat.

Total is based on either size of genome in base pairs or total number of protein-coding genes in annotated genome.

Fig. 5

Graphical circular map of Clostridium phoceensis GD3T genome. From outside in, outer two circles show ORFs oriented in forward (colored by COGs categories) and reverse (colored by COGs categories) directions, respectively. Third circle marks tRNA genes (green). Fourth circle shows G+C% content plot. Innermost circle shows GC skew, with purple indicating negative values and olive indicating positive values. COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database; ORF, open reading frame.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with 25 general COGs functional categories

CodeDescriptionValue% of totala
JTranslation1504.59
ARNA processing and modification00
KTranscription2126.49
LReplication, recombination and repair1063.24
BChromatin structure and dynamics00
DCell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis220.67
YNuclear structure00
VDefense mechanisms752.29
TSignal transduction mechanisms942.87
MCell wall/membrane biogenesis541.65
NCell motility270.82
ZCytoskeleton00
WExtracellular structures00
UIntracellular trafficking and secretion250.76
OPosttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones511.56
CEnergy production and conversion942.87
GCarbohydrate transport and metabolism1063.24
EAmino acid transport and metabolism2176.54
FNucleotide transport and metabolism491.50
HCoenzyme transport and metabolism631.93
ILipid transport and metabolism531.62
PInorganic ion transport and metabolism942.87
QSecondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism290.88
RGeneral function prediction only2317.07
SFunction unknown1263.86
Not in COGs168451.59

COGS, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database.

Total is based on total number of protein-coding genes in annotated genome.

Fig. 6

Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes in genomes from Clostridium phoceensis (Cp), Intestinimonas butyriciproducens strain ER1 (Ib), Flavonifractor plautii ATCC 29863 (Fp), Clostridium leptum DSM 753 (Cl), Clostridium cellulosi DG5 (Cc), Ethanoligenens harbinense YUAN-3 (Eh), Oscillibacter valericigenes Sjm18-20 (Ov), Clostridium viride DSM 6836 (Cv), Eubacterium siraeum V10Sc8a (Es) and Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus ATCC 29799 (PC) genomes according to clusters of orthologous groups of proteins. ATCC, American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA).

Genome comparison

We made some brief comparisons against nine genomes: Intestinimonas butyriciproducens strain ER1 (GenBank accession no. JPJD01000000), Flavonifractor plautii ATCC 29863 (AGCK01000000), Clostridium leptum DSM 753 (ABCB02000000), Clostridium cellulosi DG5 (NZ_LM995447), Ethanoligenens harbinense YUAN-3 (NC_01482), Oscillibacter valericigenes Sjm18-20 (NC_016048), Clostridium viride DSM 6836 (NZ_JHZO01000000), Eubacterium siraeum V10Sc8a (FP929059) and Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus ATCC 29799 (NZ_AAXG02000000). The draft genome sequence of C. phoceensis is smaller than those of Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus, Oscillibacter valericigenes, Flavonifractor plautii, Clostridium cellulosi and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens (3.45, 4.24, 4.47, 3.81, 5.68 and 3.57 MB respectively), but larger than those of Clostridium viride, Ethanoligenens harbinense, Clostridium leptum and Eubacterium siraeum (2.41, 3.01, 2.82 and 2.84 MB respectively). The G+C content of C. phoceensis is smaller than those of Flavonifractor plautii (59.32 and 61.07% respectively) but larger than those of Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus, Oscillibacter valericigenes, Clostridium viride, Ethanoligenens harbinense, Clostridium leptum, Eubacterium siraeum, Clostridium cellulosi and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens (59.11, 53.19, 49.28, 55.56, 50.25, 45.13, 42.07 and 58.44% respectively). The gene content of C. phoceensis is smaller than those of Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus, Oscillibacter valericigenes, Flavonifractor plautii, Clostridium cellulosi and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens (3264, 4829, 4723, 4278, 5171 and 3529 respectively) but larger than those of Clostridium viride, Ethanoligenens harbinense, Clostridium leptum and Eubacterium siraeum (2321, 2701, 2482 and 2211 respectively). C. phoceensis has a similar distribution of genes into COGs categories with the most of the compared species (Fig. 4). However, Clostridium cellulosi was overrepresented for all the categories, and Clostridium viride was overrepresented for category Z (cytoskeleton). In addition, Clostridium phoceensis shared 846, 884, 492, 562, 482, 717, 634, 407 and 842 orthologous genes respectively with Intestinimonas butyriciproducens, Flavonifractor plautii, Clostridium leptum, Clostridium cellulosi, Ethanoligenens harbinense, Oscillibacter valericigenes, Clostridium viride, Eubacterium siraeum and Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus (Table 5). Of these species, the orthologous genes shared ranged from 365 between Eubacterium siraeum and Clostridium viride to 1079 between Flavonifractor plautii and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens. Compared to other species, C. phoceensis exhibited AGIOS values ranging from 56.64 with Ethanoligenens harbinense to 71.58 with Flavonifractor plautii.
Table 5

Orthologous genes shared (upper right) and AGIOS values obtained (lower left)a

CpIbFpClCcEhOvCvEsPc
Cp3264846884492562482717634407842
Ib70.10352910795086275017716714071016
Fp71.5873.6442785236495188186864331039
Cl61.8361.6061.652482587495475432405523
Cc57.1757.9156.8261.625171619604562465616
Eh56.6456.8656.9256.1355.342701515449415499
Ov65.7265.3465.5561.6058.4056.544723653409710
Cv63.8464.5764.2160.8559.1355.0262.582321364614
Es57.8358.7757.7260.7861.3854.3759.1358.932211427
Pc61.5561.9562.8955.4352.3757.2158.0256.7353.244829

AGIOS, average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA).

Values in bold are gene numbers. Ten genomes were used for this study: Clostridium phoceensis (Cp), Intestinimonas butyriciproducens strain ER1 (Ib), Flavonifractor plautii ATCC 29863 (Fp), Clostridium leptum DSM 753 (Cl), Clostridium cellulosi DG5 (Cc), Ethanoligenens harbinense YUAN-3 (Eh), Oscillibacter valericigenes Sjm18-20 (Ov), Clostridium viride DSM 6836 (Cv), Eubacterium siraeum V10Sc8a (Es) and Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus ATCC 29799 (PC) genomes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins.

Conclusion

On the basis of taxonogenomic analyses, we propose Clostridium phoceensis sp. nov., strain GD3T (= CSUR P1929 = DSM 100334), as the type strain of C. phoceensis sp. nov., a new species within the genus Clostridium (Fig. 4). This strain was isolated from the gut microbiota of a 28-year-old healthy French man.

Taxonomic and nomenclatural proposals

Description of Clostridium phoceensis sp. nov.

Clostridium phoceensis strain GD3T (pho.ce.en'sis, L. fem. adj., from phoceensis referring to Phocea, the Greek name of the city which founded Marseille, where it was isolated) is a Gram-negative nonmotile bacillus whose individual cell size is 1.8 μm in length and 0.5 μm in diameter. It is a strictly anaerobic and endospore-forming bacterium. Strain GD3T is catalase and oxidase negative, and its optimal growth temperature is 45°C, but it also grows weakly at 37°C. Biochemical analyses showed positive reactions of C. phoceensis for d-glucose and produced esterase (C4), phosphatase acid, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and β-glucosidase enzymes. C. phoceensis was sensitive to amoxicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, imipenem, doripenem and ciprofloxacin. Its predominant cellular fatty acids are hexadecanoic acid (16:0; 33.1 ± 1.7%), 9-octadecenoic acid (18:1n9; 24.3 ± 0.6%), octadecanoic acid (18:0; 20.0 ± 0.1%), 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (18:2n6; 8.6 ± 0.1%), 11-octadecenoic acid (18:1n7; 5.5 ± 0.5%) and tetradecanoic acid (14:0; 4.7 ± 0.8%). Its 16S rRNA sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers CVUG01000000 and LN846907. Strain GD3T, whose CSUR and DSMZ numbers are respectively CSUR P1929 and DSM 100334, was identified from the stool sample of a 28-year-old healthy French man.
  22 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Clostridial toxins.

Authors:  Michel R Popoff; Philippe Bouvet
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Current and past strategies for bacterial culture in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Sophie Edouard; Isabelle Pagnier; Oleg Mediannikov; Michel Drancourt; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Rise of Microbial Culturomics: Noncontiguous Finished Genome Sequence and Description of Beduini massiliensis gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  Gaël Mourembou; Muhammad Yasir; Esam Ibraheem Azhar; Jean Christophe Lagier; Fehmida Bibi; Asif Ahmad Jiman-Fatani; Nayel Helmy; Catherine Robert; Jaishriram Rathored; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Didier Raoult; Matthieu Million
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2015-12

7.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Chana Palmer; Elisabeth M Bik; Daniel B DiGiulio; David A Relman; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization.

Authors:  Tim Carver; Nick Thomson; Alan Bleasby; Matthew Berriman; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Genome sequence and description of Anaerosalibacter massiliensis sp. nov.

Authors:  N Dione; S A Sankar; J-C Lagier; S Khelaifia; C Michele; N Armstrong; M Richez; J Abrahão; D Raoult; P-E Fournier
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2016-01-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Clostridium pacaense: a new species within the genus Clostridium.

Authors:  M Hosny; R Abou Abdallah; J Bou Khalil; A Fontanini; E Baptiste; N Armstrong; B La Scola
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2018-12-31

2.  Multidisciplinary evaluation of Clostridium butyricum clonality isolated from preterm neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis in South France between 2009 and 2017.

Authors:  Michel Hosny; Jacques Yaacoub Bou Khalil; Aurelia Caputo; Rita Abou Abdallah; Anthony Levasseur; Philippe Colson; Nadim Cassir; Bernard La Scola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium neonatale and its relationship with the occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates.

Authors:  M Hosny; E Baptiste; A Levasseur; B La Scola
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2019-10-15

4.  An online atlas of human plasma metabolite signatures of gut microbiome composition.

Authors:  Koen F Dekkers; Sergi Sayols-Baixeras; Marju Orho-Melander; Tove Fall; Gabriel Baldanzi; Christoph Nowak; Ulf Hammar; Diem Nguyen; Georgios Varotsis; Louise Brunkwall; Nynne Nielsen; Aron C Eklund; Jacob Bak Holm; H Bjørn Nielsen; Filip Ottosson; Yi-Ting Lin; Shafqat Ahmad; Lars Lind; Johan Sundström; Gunnar Engström; J Gustav Smith; Johan Ärnlöv
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Corynebacterium neomassiliense sp. nov., a new bacterium isolated in a stool sample from a healthy male pygmy.

Authors:  M Boxberger; I Hasni; M Bilen; B La Scola
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2020-01-23

6.  BIOME-Preserve: A novel storage and transport medium for preserving anaerobic microbiota samples for culture recovery.

Authors:  Embriette R Hyde; Hiram Lozano; Steven Cox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.