Literature DB >> 27817795

Frequency of Stroke After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (from an Eleven-Year Statewide Analysis).

Abel E Moreyra1, Gregory A Maniatis2, Hui Gu2, Joel N Swerdel2, James S McKinney2, Nora M Cosgrove2, William J Kostis2, John B Kostis2.   

Abstract

We compared stroke rates associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), both on-pump and off-pump, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with both drug-eluting stent (DES) and bare-metal stent (BMS) and the impact on 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. The Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System database was used to study patients who had on-pump CABG (n = 47,254), off-pump CABG (n = 19,118), and PCI with BMS (n = 46,641), and DES (n = 115,942) in New Jersey from 2002 to 2012. Multiple logistic and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of stroke and mortality. Adjustments were made for demographics, year of hospitalization, and co-morbidities. The rate of postprocedural stroke was lowest with DES (0.5%), followed by BMS (0.6%), off-pump CABG (1.3%), and on-pump CABG (1.8%). After adjustment, on-pump CABG had a higher risk of stroke compared with off-pump (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.56, p <0.0001). DES had lower risk of stroke compared with off-pump CABG (odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.74, p <0.0001). There was a significant excess risk of 1-year mortality due to the interaction between stroke and procedure type (on-pump vs off-pump CABG and PCI with DES vs BMS; p value for interaction = 0.02). In conclusion, in this retrospective analysis of nonrandomized data from a statewide database, PCI with DES was associated with the lowest rate of postprocedural stroke, and off-pump CABG had a lower rate of postprocedural stroke than on-pump CABG; there was an excess 1-year mortality risk with on-pump versus off-pump CABG and with DES versus BMS in patients with stroke.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27817795     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jithendhar Kandimalla; Zain Hussain; Paisith Piriyawat; Gustavo Rodriguez; Alberto Maud; Rakesh Khatri; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Anantha R Vellipuram
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The epidemiology of coronary artery bypass surgery in a community hospital: A comparison between 2 periods.

Authors:  Tomer Ziv-Baran; Rephael Mohr; Farhang Yazdchi; Dan Loberman
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 3.  Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Pathogenesis, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Dominick J Angiolillo; Antonino Di Franco; Davide Capodanno; Faisal Bakaeen; Michael E Farkouh; Stephen E Fremes; David Holmes; Leonard N Girardi; Sunao Nakamura; Stuart J Head; Seung-Jung Park; Michael Mack; Patrick W Serruys; Marc Ruel; Gregg W Stone; Derrick Y Tam; Michael Vallely; David P Taggart
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  André Åström; Lars Söderström; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ten-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suffering from Left Main Coronary Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Hongli Wang; Yuyuan Wei; Xinxin Li; Vineet Jhummun; Mohamad A Ahmed
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.945

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.