Literature DB >> 27815783

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: current status and future directions.

Alessandro Coppola1, John A Stauffer2, Horacio J Asbun3.   

Abstract

In recent years, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has been gaining a favorable position in the field of pancreatic surgery. However, its role still remains unclear. This review investigates the current status of LPD in high-volume centers. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, and only papers written in English containing more than 30 cases of LPD were selected. Papers with "hybrid" or robotic technique were not included in the analysis. Out of a total of 728 LPD publications, 7 publications matched the review criteria. The total number of patients analyzed was 516, and the largest series included 130 patients. Four of these studies come from the United States, 1 from France, 1 from South Korea, and 1 from India. In 6 reports, LPDs were performed only for malignant disease. The overall pancreatic fistula rate grades B-C were 12.7%. The overall conversion rate was 6.9%. LPD seems to be a valid alternative to the standard open approach with similar technical and oncological results. However, the lack of many large series, multi-institutional data, and randomized trials does not allow the clarification of the exact role of LPD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic Whipple; Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery; Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy; Mini-invasive pancreatoduodenectomy; Pancreatic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815783     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0402-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  39 in total

Review 1.  The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Recent advances and limitations of surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

3.  Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Paniccia; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1994-06

5.  Effects of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on disease recurrence and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter J Kneuertz; Sameer H Patel; Carrie K Chu; Shishir K Maithel; Juan M Sarmiento; Keith A Delman; Charles A Staley; David A Kooby
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; John A Stauffer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P W Pisters; J E Lee; J N Vauthey; C Charnsangavej; D B Evans
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic vs. open treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly and very elderly: An age-stratified multicenter study on 1606 women.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Matteo Bonzini; Stefano Palomba; Francesco Fanfani; Mario Malzoni; Marcello Ceccaroni; Renato Seracchioli; Annamaria Ferrero; Roberto Berretta; Enrico Vizza; Davide Sturla; Giovanni Roviglione; Giorgia Monterossi; Paolo Casadio; Eugenio Volpi; Daniele Mautone; Giacomo Corrado; Francesco Bruni; Giovanni Scambia; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  11 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on short-term and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Delin Ma; Wei Wang; Jianlei Wang; Tingxiao Zhang; Zhaochen Jiang; Gang Du; Jinhuan Yang; Xiqing Zhang; Guanjun Qin; Bin Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Trans-gastric pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pylorus-preserving robotic Whipple: a proposal for a standardized technique.

Authors:  Pier C Giulianotti; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Sofia Esposito; Mario Masrur; Antonio Gangemi; Francesco M Bianco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Totally Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Comparison Between Early and Late Phase of an Initial Single-Center Learning Curve.

Authors:  Michele Mazzola; Alessandro Giani; Jacopo Crippa; Lorenzo Morini; Andrea Zironda; Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio; Paolo De Martini; Carmelo Magistro; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 4.  Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Małczak; Magdalena Pisarska; Piotr Major; Michał Wysocki; Tomasz Stefura; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers and postoperative day 1 drain amylase value predict grade C pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Damiano Caputo; Alessandro Coppola; Chiara Cascone; Silvia Angeletti; Massimo Ciccozzi; Vincenzo La Vaccara; Roberto Coppola
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-15

6.  Minimally invasive drainage versus open surgical debridement in SAP/SMAP - a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Xiaole Zhu; Chaoqun Hou; Chenyuan Shi; Yi Miao; Qiang Li
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Different Biliary Microbial Flora Influence Type of Complications after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Coppola; Vincenzo La Vaccara; Tommaso Farolfi; Michele Fiore; Chiara Cascone; Sara Ramella; Silvia Spoto; Massimo Ciccozzi; Silvia Angeletti; Roberto Coppola; Damiano Caputo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  CA19.9 Serum Level Predicts Lymph-Nodes Status in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Coppola; Vincenzo La Vaccara; Michele Fiore; Tommaso Farolfi; Sara Ramella; Silvia Angeletti; Roberto Coppola; Damiano Caputo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  PANCREATODUODENECTOMY: BRAZILIAN PRACTICE PATTERNS.

Authors:  Orlando Jorge M Torres; Eduardo de Souza M Fernandes; Rodrigo Rodrigues Vasques; Fabio Luís Waechter; Paulo Cezar G Amaral; Marcelo Bruno de Rezende; Roland Montenegro Costa; André Luís Montagnini
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Analysis of pancreatic fistula risk in patients with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: what matters.

Authors:  Kate Nong; Yue Zhang; Shengyong Liu; Yue Yang; Donglin Sun; Xuemin Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.