Literature DB >> 25893407

Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Institutional Experience.

Alessandro Paniccia1, Richard D Schulick1, Barish H Edil2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy represents one of the most advanced abdominal surgical procedures; however, a standard approach is still lacking. We present our initial experience with total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) with a video of the technique that we have developed and the clinical as well as oncologic outcomes obtained with this technique.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all cases consecutively performed by two operators between January 2013 and December 2014 at The University of Colorado (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Pathology of resected lesions via total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (N = 30)
RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent TLPD; conversion to open procedure was required in two cases (6 %). Median age at diagnosis was 63.1 years [interquartile range (IQR) 53.8-70.8]. Operative characteristics and postoperative complications are summarized in Table 1. The operative time decreased from 366 minutes (IQR 320-421) in the first 15 cases to 312 min (IQR 282-372) in the second 15 cases (r = -2.7; p = 0.047). The estimated blood loss decreased from 300 mL (IQR 300-500) in the first 15 cases to 200 mL (IQR 150-375) in the second 15 cases (r = -6.3; p = 0.314). Table 1 Operative characteristics and postoperative complications Variable N = 30 Surgical margin Negative R0 30 (100 %) Number of nodes harvested Median (range) 18 (15-22) Operative time (min) Median (range) 340 (308-377) EBL (mL) Median (range) 300 (200-400) Pancreatic fistula 15 (50 %) Pancreatic fistula grade A 8 (27 %) B 5 (17 %) C 2 (7 %) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) 10 (33 %) DGE grade A 4 (14 %) B 5 (17 %) C 1 (3 %) Bile leak 3 (10 %) Pseudoaneurysm Hepatic artery 2 (7 %) GDA 1 (3 %) Chyle leak 1 (3 %) Surgical site infection (SSI) 6 (20 %) SSI type Superficial 2 (7 %) Deep 0 Organ space 6 (20 %) LOS (days) Median (range) 11 (8-15) Readmission (30 days) 6 (20 %) Death (90 days) 0
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a challenging operation, which is not performed in high volume at most centers. As a new laparoscopic pancreas program, our experience shows that oncologic outcomes are acceptable in terms of margin and lymph node harvest. There is undoubtedly a steep learning curve that complicates the initial application of TLPD; however, with the techniques displayed in this video many of the early complications can be overcome. Further study to evaluate for long-term safety is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893407     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4450-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: changing the management of ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  Brandon C Chapman; Ana Gleisner; Irada Ibrahim-Zada; Douglas M Overbey; Alessandro Paniccia; Cheryl Meguid; Brian Brauer; Csaba Gajdos; Martin D McCarter; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Alessandro Coppola; John A Stauffer; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-11-04

3.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Alessandro Paniccia; Brandon Chapman; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 4.  Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhiyong Dong; Jing Xu; Zhen Wang; Maxim S Petrov
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-06

5.  Pitfalls of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Patrick W Underwood; Michael H Gerber; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2019-01-16

6.  Laparoscopic-adapted Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ignasi Poves; Olga Morató; Fernando Burdío; Luís Grande
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Renyi Qin; Michael L Kendrick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Rowan W Parks; Yinmo Yang; Jin He; Taiping Zhang; Yiping Mou; Xianjun Yu; Bing Peng; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ho-Seong Han; Jae Hoon Lee; Michiaki Unno; Steven W M Olde Damink; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Pierce Chow; Tan To Cheung; Nim Choi; Yu-Wen Tien; Chengfeng Wang; Manson Fok; Xiujun Cai; Shengquan Zou; Shuyou Peng; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  Analysis of the Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael H Gerber; Daniel Delitto; Cristina J Crippen; Thomas J George; Kevin E Behrns; Jose G Trevino; Jessica L Cioffi; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Single center experience in selecting the laparoscopic Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Chun-Lu Tan; Hao Zhang; Ke-Zhou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.