Literature DB >> 27815631

Clinical application of suction-tube-assisted septal submucosal dissection for endoscopic septoplasty.

Wen-Sen Lai1,2,3, Yuan-Yung Lin1, Cheng-Ping Shih1, Hsin-Chien Chen1, Pei-Lin Yang4, Yueng-Hsiang Chu1, Jinn-Moon Yang3, Jih-Chin Lee5,6.   

Abstract

Endoscopic septoplasty has become the favored approach for the treatment of a deviated septum. Careful septal dissection results in less bleeding, clear endoscopic view, shortened operative time, and fewer postoperative complications. We describe our 5-year experience of using an 8 French Frazier suction tube for submucosal dissection compared with the traditional septoplasty. A total of 434 patients who underwent septoplasty were recruited. The patients in the study were divided into two Groups 1 and 2 based on the employed surgical techniques to treat deviated nasal septum: traditional septoplasty (Group 1: 105 patients) and suction-tube-assisted endoscopic septoplasty (Group 2: 329 patients). All the patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. No statistically significant differences could be traced between the groups in any demographic factor, regarding the gender, age, and the intraoperative and postoperative complications. A significantly shorter operative time was found in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The overall incidence of minor complications was 6.6% in Group 1 and 4.6% in Group 2. The suction-tube-assisted dissection technique is found to be a surgical alternative, effective with a significantly shorter operating time, and economical option in septal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic septoplasty; Submucosal dissection; Suction tube

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815631     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4368-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  Risk of nasal septal perforation following septoplasty in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Ozgul Topal; Sakir Bilge Celik; Seyra Erbek; Selim S Erbek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Endoscopic septoplasty.

Authors:  Anne E Getz; Peter H Hwang
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 3.  Complications of septal surgery.

Authors:  J A Schwab; W Pirsig
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.446

Review 4.  Trans-septal suturing technique in septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Certal; H Silva; T Santos; A Correia; C Carvalho
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  Septoplasty is a proven and effective procedure: an expert's view of a burning issue.

Authors:  J A de Ru
Journal:  B-ENT       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.082

6.  Limited septoplasty for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  H Cantrell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.591

7.  Powered Endoscopic Nasal Septal Surgery.

Authors:  Aderito de Sousa; Livia Iniciarte; Howard Levine
Journal:  Acta Med Port       Date:  2005-09-16

8.  Endoscopic septoplasty in primary cases using electromechanical instruments: surgical technique, efficacy and results.

Authors:  Aderito De Sousa Fontes; Minaret Sandrea Jiménez; Rosa R Chacaltana Ayerve
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2013-06-02

9.  Endoscopic septoplasty: revisitation of the technique, indications, and outcomes.

Authors:  Brian J Chung; Pete S Batra; Martin J Citardi; Donald C Lanza
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2007 May-Jun

10.  Complications of the surgery for deviated nasal septum.

Authors:  Iqbal A Muhammad
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.