PROBLEM: The scientific research agenda of the Dutch Association of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery claims that there is a knowledge gap with regard to the efficacy of septoplasty for a blocked nose. This assertion is based on a restrictive approach to evidence-based medicine that could result in unnecessary trials and the abolition or rationing of sound treatment options. METHODOLOGY: The arguments in favour of the effectiveness of septoplasty are based on the total spectrum of evidence from research, clinical experience and basic science. RESULTS: The best available evidence shows that this form of treatment is satisfactory for more than two thirds of all patients. CONCLUSION: If all levels of evidence are taken into account, it becomes clear that there is no knowledge gap with regard to the efficacy of septoplasty for blocked nose.
PROBLEM: The scientific research agenda of the Dutch Association of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery claims that there is a knowledge gap with regard to the efficacy of septoplasty for a blocked nose. This assertion is based on a restrictive approach to evidence-based medicine that could result in unnecessary trials and the abolition or rationing of sound treatment options. METHODOLOGY: The arguments in favour of the effectiveness of septoplasty are based on the total spectrum of evidence from research, clinical experience and basic science. RESULTS: The best available evidence shows that this form of treatment is satisfactory for more than two thirds of all patients. CONCLUSION: If all levels of evidence are taken into account, it becomes clear that there is no knowledge gap with regard to the efficacy of septoplasty for blocked nose.