Literature DB >> 27815456

Applicability of Commercially Available ELISA Kits for the Quantification of Faecal Immunoreactive Corticosterone Metabolites in Mice.

Klas S P Abelson1, Otto Kalliokoski2, Anne Charlotte Teilmann2, Jann Hau2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Commercially available ELISA kits are popular among investigators that quantify faecal corticosterone or cortisol metabolites (FCM) for stress assessment in animals. However, in faeces, these assays mainly detect immunoreactive glucocorticoid metabolites. Since different assays contain antibodies of different origin, the detection level and cross-reactivity towards different metabolites and other steroids differ considerably between assays. Thus, the validity of one assay for FCM quantification in stress assessment is not necessarily the same for another assay.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was designed to investigate corticosterone (CORT) in serum and FCM levels in faeces of laboratory mice, as quantified in four different ELISA kits (DRG EIA-4164, Demeditec DEV9922, Enzo ADI-900-097 and Cayman EIA kit 500655). Assay kits were chosen based on the origin of the antibody, detection level and variation in cross-reactivity.
RESULTS: As expected, all four assay kits could detect higher serum CORT levels in mice treated with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), compared to untreated mice. Unexpectedly though, the measured concentration of serum CORT differed significantly between assays, in both groups of mice. In faecal samples, there was no consistent positive correlation between the levels detected in the four assays and the measured concentration of FCM also differed between assays.
CONCLUSION: Whereas commercially available CORT ELISAs are frequently successfully used for FCM quantification, validation of the assays is necessary as all assays do not work well under all circumstances. In this study, the ELISAs could determine relative differences in serum CORT levels and FCM levels between samples; however, the fidelity of the measurements to the true concentrations was low.
Copyright © 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mice; faecal corticosterone metabolites; immune assays; stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815456     DOI: 10.21873/invivo.10989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Analytic and Interpretational Pitfalls to Measuring Fecal Corticosterone Metabolites in Laboratory Rats and Mice.

Authors:  Neil E Rowland; Linda A Toth
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum.

Authors:  Anne Marie Kinn Rød; Nina Harkestad; Finn Konow Jellestad; Robert Murison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Translational Metabolomics: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Farhana R Pinu; Seyed Ali Goldansaz; Jacob Jaine
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-06-06

4.  The influence of rat strain on the development of neuropathic pain and comorbid anxio-depressive behaviour after nerve injury.

Authors:  Sara Hestehave; Klas S P Abelson; Tina Brønnum Pedersen; David P Finn; Daniel R Andersson; Gordon Munro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Cohousing Mice and Rats on Stress Levels, and the Attractiveness of Dyadic Social Interaction in C57BL/6J and CD1 Mice as Well as Sprague Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Gerald Zernig; Hussein Ghareh; Helena Berchtold
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

6.  Hypothalamic deep brain stimulation as a strategy to manage anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Han-Tao Li; Dane C Donegan; Daria Peleg-Raibstein; Denis Burdakov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Support vector machines for explaining physiological stress response in Wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus).

Authors:  Beatriz Sánchez-González; Isabel Barja; Ana Piñeiro; M Carmen Hernández-González; Gema Silván; Juan Carlos Illera; Roberto Latorre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Foraging, feeding, and physiological stress responses of wild wood mice to increased illumination and common genet cues.

Authors:  Álvaro Navarro-Castilla; Isabel Barja; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Corticosterone in feathers of laying hens: an assay validation for evidence-based assessment of animal welfare.

Authors:  K E Häffelin; R Lindenwald; F Kaufmann; S Döhring; B Spindler; R Preisinger; S Rautenschlein; N Kemper; R Andersson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.