Literature DB >> 27815391

Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy Measures Vascular Pore Size in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.

Rajendar K Mittapalli1, Chris E Adkins2, Kaci A Bohn1,3, Afroz S Mohammad2, Julie A Lockman2, Paul R Lockman4,2.   

Abstract

Tumors residing in the central nervous system (CNS) compromise the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via increased vascular permeability, with the magnitude of changes dependent on the tumor type and location. Current studies determine penetrability of a cancer therapeutic by administering progressively larger molecules until cutoff is observed where little to no tumor accumulation occurs. However, decades-old experimental work and mathematical modeling document methods to calculate both the size of the vascular opening (pore) with solute permeability values. In this study, we updated this classic mathematical modeling approach with quantitative fluorescence microscopy in two preclinical tumor models, allowing simultaneous administration of multiple sized tracers to determine vascular permeability at a resolution of nearly one micron. We observed that three molecules ranging from 100 Da to 70 kDa permeated into a preclinical glioblastoma model at rates proportional to their diffusion in water. This suggests the solutes freely diffused from blood to glioma across vascular pores without steric restriction, which calculates to a pore size of >140 nm in diameter. In contrast, the calculated pore size of a brain metastasis of breast cancer was approximately 10-fold smaller than glioma vasculature. This difference explains why antibodies are effective against glioblastoma but generally fail in brain metastases of breast cancer. On the basis of our observations, we hypothesize that trastuzumab most likely fails in the treatment of brain metastases of breast cancer because of poor CNS penetration, while the similar sized antibody bevacizumab is effective in the same tumor type not because it penetrates the CNS degree better, but because it scavenges VEGF in the vascular compartment, which reduces edema and permeation. Cancer Res; 77(2); 238-46. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815391      PMCID: PMC5267930          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

Review 1.  Vascular structures in brain tumors.

Authors:  A Hirano; T Matsui
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  The hydrodynamic radii of macromolecules and their effect on red blood cell aggregation.

Authors:  J K Armstrong; R B Wenby; H J Meiselman; T C Fisher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Mechanism of L-glucose, raffinose, and inulin transport across intact blood-brain barriers.

Authors:  K J Lucchesi; R E Gosselin
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-03

4.  Disparity between Stokes radii of dextrans and proteins as determined by retention volume in gel permeation chromatography.

Authors:  R P Frigon; J K Leypoldt; S Uyeji; L W Henderson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data.

Authors:  C S Patlak; R G Blasberg; J D Fenstermacher
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Ultrastructural localization of the vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF) receptor-2 (FLK-1, KDR) in normal mouse kidney and in the hyperpermeable vessels induced by VPF/VEGF-expressing tumors and adenoviral vectors.

Authors:  D Feng; J A Nagy; R A Brekken; A Pettersson; E J Manseau; K Pyne; R Mulligan; P E Thorpe; H F Dvorak; A M Dvorak
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Size-dependent permeability of hydrophilic probes across rabbit colonic epithelium.

Authors:  H Ghandehari; P L Smith; H Ellens; P Y Yeh; J Kopecek
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Local blood-to-tissue transport in Walker 256 metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  R G Blasberg; W R Shapiro; P Molnar; C S Patlak; J D Fenstermacher
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  The evolving role of monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer: early presumptions and impact on clinical trial development.

Authors:  Cathy Eng
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-01-12

10.  Vascular endothelial growth factor blockade alters magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of vascular function and decreases barrier permeability in a rat model of lung cancer brain metastasis.

Authors:  Gregory L Pishko; Leslie L Muldoon; Michael A Pagel; Daniel L Schwartz; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2015-02-17
View more
  30 in total

1.  Drug delivery to melanoma brain metastases: Can current challenges lead to new opportunities?

Authors:  Gautham Gampa; Shruthi Vaidhyanathan; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 2.  Improving CNS Delivery to Brain Metastases by Blood-Tumor Barrier Disruption.

Authors:  Samuel A Sprowls; Tasneem A Arsiwala; Jacob R Bumgarner; Neal Shah; Sundus S Lateef; Brooke N Kielkowski; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2019-07-20

Review 3.  Biomaterials for vaccine-based cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Margaret M Billingsley; Michael J Mitchell
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  A Blazing Landscape: Neuroinflammation Shapes Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Hila Doron; Tobias Pukrop; Neta Erez
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Development of Halofluorochromic Polymer Nanoassemblies for the Potential Detection of Liver Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Tumors Using Experimental and Computational Approaches.

Authors:  Derek Reichel; Louis T Curtis; Elizabeth Ehlman; B Mark Evers; Piotr Rychahou; Hermann B Frieboes; Younsoo Bae
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Liposomal Irinotecan Accumulates in Metastatic Lesions, Crosses the Blood-Tumor Barrier (BTB), and Prolongs Survival in an Experimental Model of Brain Metastases of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Afroz S Mohammad; Jessica I Griffith; Chris E Adkins; Neal Shah; Emily Sechrest; Emma L Dolan; Tori B Terrell-Hall; Bart S Hendriks; Helen Lee; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Drug Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Blame the Barrier or the Brain?

Authors:  Sheheryar Kabraji; Jing Ni; Nancy U Lin; Shaozhen Xie; Eric P Winer; Jean J Zhao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Foe or friend? Janus-faces of the neurovascular unit in the formation of brain metastases.

Authors:  Imola Wilhelm; Csilla Fazakas; Kinga Molnár; Attila G Végh; János Haskó; István A Krizbai
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Mechanisms of enhanced drug delivery in brain metastases with focused ultrasound-induced blood-tumor barrier disruption.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Vasileios Askoxylakis; Yutong Guo; Meenal Datta; Jonas Kloepper; Gino B Ferraro; Miguel O Bernabeu; Dai Fukumura; Nathan McDannold; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Nanoparticles Containing a Combination of a Drug and an Antibody for the Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Emily A Wyatt; Mark E Davis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.