Literature DB >> 27813519

Comparison of vision-related quality of life in primary open-angle glaucoma and dry-type age-related macular degeneration.

S Karadeniz Ugurlu1, A E Kocakaya Altundal1, M Altin Ekin1.   

Abstract

PurposeTo compare quality of life (QoL) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and dry-type age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with similar best-corrected visual acuity.MethodsAge-, sex-, and visual acuity-matched POAG and dry AMD patients were included in the study. Each patient performed 24-2 and 10-2 SITA standard visual field tests. Contrast sensitivity was evaluated with CSV-1000 HGT instrument. The 25 item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to analyze QoL. Overall and subscale scores were converted to scores between 0 and 100, the higher scores indicating better vision-related QoL.ResultsOverall NEI-VFQ-25 scores were 86.44 and 84.66 in glaucoma and AMD groups, respectively (P=0.244). The highest scores were obtained in 'vision-related dependency' subgroup in glaucoma and 'color and peripheral vision' in AMD group, whereas the lowest scores were noted 'in peripheral vision' in both glaucoma and AMD patients. Glaucoma patients had significantly lower scores in ocular pain, color vision, and peripheral vision subgroups compared with the AMD group, whereas AMD patients had lower scores in near and distance vision activities, vision-related social activity, and dependency subgroups. Contrast sensitivity results and mean defect values showed correlation with NEI-VFQ-25 scores in both groups.ConclusionsGlaucoma and AMD patients with similar visual acuity experienced similar overall impairment in QoL. However, glaucoma patients described more difficulty with peripheral vision and ocular pain, whereas AMD patients complained more about near and distance vision and dependency items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27813519      PMCID: PMC5350355          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  48 in total

1.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Temporal contrast sensitivity with peripheral and central stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  I M Velten; M Korth; F K Horn; W M Budde
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Correlation of quality of life with clinical symptoms and signs at the time of glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  R P Mills
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1998

4.  How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Gary S Rubin; Aimee T Broman; Beatriz Muñoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen Turano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

5.  Quality of life of low-vision patients and the impact of low-vision services.

Authors:  I U Scott; W E Smiddy; J Schiffman; W J Feuer; C J Pappas
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Cross-validation of the Turkish version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25).

Authors:  Ahmet Baris Toprak; Erhan Eser; Cenap Guler; Fatma Esin Baser; Hüseyin Mayali
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.648

7.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Vision-specific quality of life in Greek glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Andreas Katsanos; Michael Fanariotis; Fani Zacharaki; Dimitrios Chatzoulis; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and visual function in Japanese glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Hideko Sawada; Takeo Fukuchi; Haruki Abe
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-28

10.  Psychometric properties of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese version.

Authors:  Yoshimi Suzukamo; Tetsuro Oshika; Mitsuko Yuzawa; Yoshihiro Tokuda; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Kotaro Oki; Carol M Mangione; Joseph Green; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of Visual Acuity Improvement With Uncorrected Refractive Error in Patients New to Low Vision Clinics.

Authors:  Xinxing Guo; Bonnielin K Swenor; Judith E Goldstein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Predicting the Real-World Future of Glaucoma Patients? Cautions Are Required for Machine Learning.

Authors:  Erping Long; Peixing Wan; Yehong Zhuo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Development and Validation of the Singapore Thyroid Eye Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  Melissa H Y Wong; Eva Fenwick; Ai Tee Aw; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Lay Leng Seah
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Deterioration of contrast sensitivity in eyes with epiphora due to lacrimal passage obstruction.

Authors:  Kuniharu Tasaki; Sujin Hoshi; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Efficacy of Nimodipine Combined with Latanoprost in Treating Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Influence on Ocular Hemodynamics and Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  Hui-Ping Duan; Rong Liu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 6.  Should clinical automated perimetry be considered for routine functional assessment of early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? A systematic review of current literature.

Authors:  Matt Trinh; Michael Kalloniatis; Lisa Nivison-Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Contrast sensitivity function with soft contact lens wear.

Authors:  Kishor Sapkota; Sandra Franco; Madalena Lira
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-02-13

8.  Influence of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses on visual field sensitivity.

Authors:  Makiko Takahashi; Chiemi Yamashiro; Takuya Yoshimoto; Yuka Kobayashi; Fumiaki Higashijima; Masaaki Kobayashi; Makoto Hatano; Manami Ohta; Tomohiko Nagai; Shinichiro Teranishi; Katsuyoshi Suzuki; Ryu Takabatake; Kazuhiro Kimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.