Literature DB >> 27811880

Are patients with impacted canines referred too late?

D Patel1, N G Taylor2.   

Abstract

Objective To establish the appropriateness of timing of referrals for patients referred for the management of ectopic maxillary canines, and to evaluate the success of previous recommendations to educate referrers.Design Retrospective clinical re-audit.Setting Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.Subjects and methods Data were collected retrospectively for 220 consecutive patients between January 2013 - December 2014 and compared to the gold standard based on the clinical guidelines for management of the palatally ectopic maxillary canine published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England in 2010 which states that all patients with an impacted canine should be referred by 12 years of age.Results Ectopic maxillary canines represent a significant number of referrals to district general hospitals. One hundred and sixty-seven patients (76%) were referred late (>12 years) at a mean age of 14.1 years, >2 years later than the recommendations made in the Royal College Guidelines. Seventy-six percent of patients were not referred by 12 years of age compared to an audit in 2002 which found 45% delayed referral.Conclusion Timing of referral was delayed compared with the Royal College Guidelines. An increase in delayed referral suggests that local education programmes introduced after the previous audit did not have a lasting effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27811880     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  25 in total

1.  An audit of referral practice for patients with impacted palatal canines and the impact of referral guidelines.

Authors:  T Hassan; S J Nute
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Ranges of normalcy in the eruption of permanent teeth.

Authors:  V O HURME
Journal:  J Dent Child       Date:  1949

Review 3.  Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children.

Authors:  Nicola Parkin; Susan Furness; Anwar Shah; Bikram Thind; Zoe Marshman; Gillian Glenroy; Fiona Dyer; Philip E Benson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

4.  Palatally impacted canines: the case for preorthodontic uncovering and autonomous eruption.

Authors:  David P Mathews; Vincent G Kokich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to anomalous or missing lateral incisors: a population study.

Authors:  I Brin; A Becker; M Shalhav
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Observations on the misplaced upper canine tooth.

Authors:  T B Bass
Journal:  Dent Pract Dent Rec       Date:  1967-09

7.  Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study.

Authors:  S Ericson; P J Kurol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Familial trends in palatal canines, anomalous lateral incisors, and related phenomena.

Authors:  Y Zilberman; B Cohen; A Becker
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Impacted maxillary canines: a review.

Authors:  S E Bishara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Extraction of the deciduous canine as an interceptive treatment in children with palatal displaced canines - part I: shall we extract the deciduous canine or not?

Authors:  Julia Naoumova; Jüri Kurol; Heidrun Kjellberg
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impacted canines.

Authors:  M Wardle
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.