Literature DB >> 25246604

Extraction of the deciduous canine as an interceptive treatment in children with palatal displaced canines - part I: shall we extract the deciduous canine or not?

Julia Naoumova1, Jüri Kurol2, Heidrun Kjellberg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether extraction of the deciduous canines facilitates eruption of the palatal displaced canines (PDCs), and to analyse root resorption in adjacent teeth caused by the PDCs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria for participants were as follows: children at age 10-13 years with either maxillary unilateral or bilateral PDC, persisting deciduous canine and no previous experience of orthodontic treatment. Sixty-seven patients (40 girls and 27 boys; age: mean ± standard deviation: 11.4±1.0) with unilateral (45) or bilateral (22) PDCs were consecutively recruited and randomly allocated using permuted block randomization method to extraction or non-extraction. No patients dropped out after the randomization or during the study. Patients underwent a clinical examination and cone beam computed tomography at baseline (T0), after 6 (T1) and 12 months (T2). The total observation time was 24 months. Outcome measures were eruption, positional changes, length of time until eruption, and root resorption of adjacent teeth. The baseline images were measured blinded while the 6- and 12-month control images were not, since it was not possible to blind the extracted canine.
RESULTS: Significantly more spontaneous eruptions of the PDCs were seen in the extraction group (EG) than in the control group (CG), with rates of 69 and 39 per cent, respectively, with a mean eruption time of 15.6±5.6 months in the EG and 18.8±5.8 months in the CG. Significant differences in changes between the groups, in favour of the EG, were found for all variables except for the sagittal angle. In the EG, the changes in the distances of the canine cusp-tip were larger during the first 6 months, while the change of apex was larger between 6 and 12 months. There were no significant differences in resorption of adjacent teeth between the groups. LIMITATIONS: Imputation values were used for the PDCs who had erupted at T2, since no x-rays were taken for ethical reasons, which might have given uncertainty in the positional changes between T1 and T2.
CONCLUSIONS: Extraction of the deciduous canine is an effective treatment in patients with PDCs. Significantly more positional changes and shorter mean eruption time were seen in the EG. Resorptions of lateral incisors were seen in both groups, but none exceeded grade 2 (resorption up to half of the dentine thickness to the pulp). REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in "FoU i Sverige" (http://www.fou.nu/is/sverige), registration number: 40921. PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246604     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

1.  Associations among palatal impaction of canine, sella turcica bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen).

Authors:  Sepideh Dadgar; Mona Alimohamadi; Nikoo Rajabi; Vahid Rakhshan; Farhad Sobouti
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  The multidisciplinary management of hypodontia: a team approach.

Authors:  D S Gill; C S Barker
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Are patients with impacted canines referred too late?

Authors:  D Patel; N G Taylor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in children aged 9 to 14 years.

Authors:  Philip E Benson; Amarpreet Atwal; Farhan Bazargani; Nicola Parkin; Bikram Thind
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Space conditions, palatal vault height, and tooth size in patients with and without palatally displaced canines: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julia Naoumova; Gabriel Edgardo Alfaro; Sheldon Peck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Double vs single primary tooth extraction in interceptive treatment of palatally displaced canines.

Authors:  Sigurd Hadler-Olsen; Anders Sjögren; Jeanett Steinnes; Mari Dubland; Napat Limchaichana Bolstad; Pertti Pirttiniemi; Heidi Kerosuo; Raija Lähdesmaki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Practicing evidence-based Orthodontics: How to critically appraise a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

8.  Risk of developing palatally displaced canines in patients with early detectable dental anomalies: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniela Gamba Garib; Melissa Lancia; Renata Mayumi Kato; Thais Marchini Oliveira; Lucimara Teixeira das Neves
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Prevalence of maxillary canine impaction in skeletal Class III malocclusions compared to Class I malocclusions.

Authors:  Gabriele Di Carlo; Matteo Saccucci; Valeria Luzzi; Gaetano Ierardo; Iole Vozza; Gian-Luca Sfasciotti; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-03-01

10.  A comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and conventional radiography in diagnosing the extent of root resorptions.

Authors:  Elham Alamadi; Hisham Alhazmi; Ken Hansen; Ted Lundgren; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.