Literature DB >> 27811299

A general relationship links gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces.

Kenneth P Clark1,2, Laurence J Ryan1, Peter G Weyand3.   

Abstract

The relationship between gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces is widely regarded as complex. This viewpoint has evolved primarily via efforts to explain the rising edge of vertical force-time waveforms observed during slow human running. Existing theoretical models do provide good rising-edge fits, but require more than a dozen input variables to sum the force contributions of four or more vague components of the body's total mass (mb). Here, we hypothesized that the force contributions of two discrete body mass components are sufficient to account for vertical ground reaction force-time waveform patterns in full (stance foot and shank, m1=0.08mb; remaining mass, m2=0.92mb). We tested this hypothesis directly by acquiring simultaneous limb motion and ground reaction force data across a broad range of running speeds (3.0-11.1 m s-1) from 42 subjects who differed in body mass (range: 43-105 kg) and foot-strike mechanics. Predicted waveforms were generated from our two-mass model using body mass and three stride-specific measures: contact time, aerial time and lower limb vertical acceleration during impact. Measured waveforms (N=500) differed in shape and varied by more than twofold in amplitude and duration. Nonetheless, the overall agreement between the 500 measured waveforms and those generated independently by the model approached unity (R2=0.95±0.04, mean±s.d.), with minimal variation across the slow, medium and fast running speeds tested (ΔR2≤0.04), and between rear-foot (R2=0.94±0.04, N=177) versus fore-foot (R2=0.95±0.04, N=323) strike mechanics. We conclude that the motion of two anatomically discrete components of the body's mass is sufficient to explain the vertical ground reaction force-time waveform patterns observed during human running.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impact forces; Motion sensing; Running performance; Spring–mass model; Two-mass model; Wearable sensors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27811299     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.138057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Added lower limb mass does not affect biomechanical asymmetry but increases metabolic power in runners with a unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Ryan S Alcantara; Owen N Beck; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Elite long jumpers with below the knee prostheses approach the board slower, but take-off more effectively than non-amputee athletes.

Authors:  Steffen Willwacher; Johannes Funken; Kai Heinrich; Ralf Müller; Hiroaki Hobara; Alena M Grabowski; Gert-Peter Brüggemann; Wolfgang Potthast
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance.

Authors:  Eric D Magrum; John P Wagle; Brad H DeWeese; Kimitake Sato; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-17

4.  Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech.

Authors:  Emily S Matijevich; Lauren M Branscombe; Leon R Scott; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Adaptation of Running Biomechanics to Repeated Barefoot Running: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Karsten Hollander; Dominik Liebl; Stephanie Meining; Klaus Mattes; Steffen Willwacher; Astrid Zech
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Effects of Wearable Devices with Biofeedback on Biomechanical Performance of Running-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Giraldo-Pedroza; Winson Chiu-Chun Lee; Wing-Kai Lam; Robyn Coman; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Relationship between duty factor and external forces in slow recreational runners.

Authors:  Senne Bonnaerens; Pieter Fiers; Samuel Galle; Rud Derie; Peter Aerts; Edward Frederick; Yasunori Kaneko; Wim Derave; Dirk De Clercq; Veerle Segers
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-03-03

8.  The feasibility of predicting ground reaction forces during running from a trunk accelerometry driven mass-spring-damper model.

Authors:  Niels J Nedergaard; Jasper Verheul; Barry Drust; Terence Etchells; Paulo Lisboa; Mark A Robinson; Jos Vanrenterghem
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Mechanical Power in Endurance Running: A Scoping Review on Sensors for Power Output Estimation during Running.

Authors:  Diego Jaén-Carrillo; Luis E Roche-Seruendo; Antonio Cartón-Llorente; Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo; Felipe García-Pinillos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  'Whip from the hip': thigh angular motion, ground contact mechanics, and running speed.

Authors:  Kenneth P Clark; Christopher R Meng; David J Stearne
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.