Literature DB >> 27811096

Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain LRB.

Saswati Biswas1, Indranil Biswas2.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus rhamnosus is a Gram-positive facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium. It is often isolated from the gastrointestinal tract, mouth, vagina, and fermented dairy products. We have isolated the L. rhamnosus strain LRB from a healthy baby tooth that had naturally fallen out. Here, we report the annotated whole-genome sequence of LRB.
Copyright © 2016 Biswas and Biswas.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27811096      PMCID: PMC5095466          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01208-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacillus rhamnosus is a Gram-positive lactic acid bacterium isolated from diverse ecological niches, including the gastrointestinal tract, oral cavity, vagina, and fermented dairy products. The majority of the strains of this species are considered to be probiotics, especially for their roles in the intestine and vagina. We have isolated L. rhamnosus LRB from a baby tooth that had fallen out naturally. The complete genome sequence of this strain was determined using the PacBio long-read sequencing method and de novo assembly (1). Sequencing data were generated with 16.11-fold coverage and assembled using the assembly program SMRT2.3.0_HGAP3_May132016 (2). The genome of L. rhamnosus LRB consists of a circular chromosome of 2,934,954 bp with 46.78% G+C content. The whole-genome sequence was annotated with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (3). This genome contains 2,749 total genes, among which 2,672 are total protein-coding sequences (2,428 coding genes and 244 pseudogenes). This strain contains 15 rRNA genes, 59 tRNA genes, and one clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) array. This isolate did not contain any plasmids. A total of 11 base modification motifs were found in the LRB genome by PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing. The most extensively studied strain, L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103), a gut isolate, consists of a genome of 3,010,111 bp (GenBank accession no. NC_013198) (4). Therefore, the LRB genome is 75,157 bp shorter than that of GG. BAGEL3 analysis shows that L. rhamnosus strains contain a varied number of predicted bacteriocin loci, generally ranging from two to four loci. Like GG, the strain LRB contains four predicted bacteriocin loci (5). The LRB genome contains the pilus gene cluster spaFED, along with a class C sortase in the locus. However, LRB lacks the spaCBA gene cluster of GG and is not expected to produce functional pili (6). This difference may indicate why the respective strains reside in different habitats. In a phylogenetic context, the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server predicted L. rhamnosus strain HN001 (accession no. NZ_ABWJ00000000.1), a food isolate, to be the closest neighbor of LRB (7). However, the genome sequence of HN001 used for this prediction was a draft genome (8). The second and third closest neighbors are intestinal isolates LMS2-1 and GG, respectively. It is not unusual that the strains isolated from different ecological niches have a close phylogenetic relationship. Intestinal isolates, LMS2-1, E800, and ATCC 21052, are shown to individually occupy the closest branch of a phylogenetic tree with a food isolate (9). This fact indicates that these intestinal isolates may have first originated from food and eventually evolved. Since LRB has a slightly larger genome (20,546 bp) than the food isolate and closest neighbor, L. rhamnosus HN001 (10), we can speculate that LRB has also originated from food and evolved by acquiring a small number of genes to become an oral resident. According to a recent report, L. rhamnosus is capable of adapting to a new environmental niche with little genetic variation (9).

Accession number(s).

This complete genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. CP016823.
  10 in total

1.  Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; David H Alexander; Patrick Marks; Aaron A Klammer; James Drake; Cheryl Heiner; Alicia Clum; Alex Copeland; John Huddleston; Evan E Eichler; Stephen W Turner; Jonas Korlach
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  A protective effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 against eczema in the first 2 years of life persists to age 4 years.

Authors:  K Wickens; P Black; T V Stanley; E Mitchell; C Barthow; P Fitzharris; G Purdie; J Crane
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.018

3.  Complete genome sequence of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Morita; Hidehiro Toh; Kenshiro Oshima; Masaru Murakami; Todd D Taylor; Shizunobu Igimi; Masahira Hattori
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human- mucus binding protein.

Authors:  Matti Kankainen; Lars Paulin; Soile Tynkkynen; Ingemar von Ossowski; Justus Reunanen; Pasi Partanen; Reetta Satokari; Satu Vesterlund; Antoni P A Hendrickx; Sarah Lebeer; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker; Jos Vanderleyden; Tuula Hämäläinen; Suvi Laukkanen; Noora Salovuori; Jarmo Ritari; Edward Alatalo; Riitta Korpela; Tiina Mattila-Sandholm; Anna Lassig; Katja Hatakka; Katri T Kinnunen; Heli Karjalainen; Maija Saxelin; Kati Laakso; Anu Surakka; Airi Palva; Tuomas Salusjärvi; Petri Auvinen; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules.

Authors:  John Eid; Adrian Fehr; Jeremy Gray; Khai Luong; John Lyle; Geoff Otto; Paul Peluso; David Rank; Primo Baybayan; Brad Bettman; Arkadiusz Bibillo; Keith Bjornson; Bidhan Chaudhuri; Frederick Christians; Ronald Cicero; Sonya Clark; Ravindra Dalal; Alex Dewinter; John Dixon; Mathieu Foquet; Alfred Gaertner; Paul Hardenbol; Cheryl Heiner; Kevin Hester; David Holden; Gregory Kearns; Xiangxu Kong; Ronald Kuse; Yves Lacroix; Steven Lin; Paul Lundquist; Congcong Ma; Patrick Marks; Mark Maxham; Devon Murphy; Insil Park; Thang Pham; Michael Phillips; Joy Roy; Robert Sebra; Gene Shen; Jon Sorenson; Austin Tomaney; Kevin Travers; Mark Trulson; John Vieceli; Jeffrey Wegener; Dawn Wu; Alicia Yang; Denis Zaccarin; Peter Zhao; Frank Zhong; Jonas Korlach; Stephen Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes.

Authors:  F Meyer; D Paarmann; M D'Souza; R Olson; E M Glass; M Kubal; T Paczian; A Rodriguez; R Stevens; A Wilke; J Wilkening; R A Edwards
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  BAGEL3: Automated identification of genes encoding bacteriocins and (non-)bactericidal posttranslationally modified peptides.

Authors:  Auke J van Heel; Anne de Jong; Manuel Montalbán-López; Jan Kok; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Direct selection and phage display of a Gram-positive secretome.

Authors:  Dragana Jankovic; Michael A Collett; Mark W Lubbers; Jasna Rakonjac
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  A comparative pan-genome perspective of niche-adaptable cell-surface protein phenotypes in Lactobacillus rhamnosus.

Authors:  Ravi Kant; Johanna Rintahaka; Xia Yu; Pia Sigvart-Mattila; Lars Paulin; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Maria Saarela; Airi Palva; Ingemar von Ossowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Ribosomal protein L4 of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LRB alters resistance to macrolides and other antibiotics.

Authors:  Saswati Biswas; Andrew Keightley; Indranil Biswas
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.563

2.  Dietary Fibers and Protective Lactobacilli Drive Burrata Cheese Microbiome.

Authors:  Fabio Minervini; Amalia Conte; Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile; Marco Gobbetti; Maria De Angelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  In vitro anti-tuberculosis effect of probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus PMC203 isolated from vaginal microbiota.

Authors:  Md Abdur Rahim; Hoonhee Seo; Sukyung Kim; Hanieh Tajdozian; Indrajeet Barman; Youngkyoung Lee; Saebim Lee; Ho-Yeon Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Characterization of a stress tolerance-defective mutant of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LRB.

Authors:  Saswati Biswas; Andrew Keightley; Indranil Biswas
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.563

5.  Complete Genome Sequence of Streptococcus mutans Strain MD, Which Produces Highly Potent Mutacins.

Authors:  Saswati Biswas; Indranil Biswas
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2020-08-13

6.  Complete Genome Sequences of Two Mutacin-Producing Streptococcus mutans Strains, T8 and UA140.

Authors:  Indranil Biswas
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2020-06-11

7.  Intra-species variation within Lactobacillus rhamnosus correlates to beneficial or harmful outcomes: lessons from the oral cavity.

Authors:  Mangala A Nadkarni; Nandan P Deshpande; Marc R Wilkins; Neil Hunter
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.