Literature DB >> 27810865

Graphics and Statistics for Cardiology: Data visualisation for meta-analysis.

Amit Kiran1, Abel Pérez Crespillo1, Kazem Rahimi1.   

Abstract

Graphical displays play a pivotal role in understanding data sets and disseminating results. For meta-analysis, they are instrumental in presenting findings from multiple studies. This report presents guidance to authors wishing to submit graphical displays as part of their meta-analysis to a clinical cardiology journal, such as HeartWhen using graphical displays for meta-analysis, we recommend the following: Use a flow diagram to describe the number of studies returned from the initial search, the inclusion/exclusion criteria applied and the final number of studies used in the meta-analysis.Present results from the meta-analysis using a figure that incorporates a forest plot and underlying (tabulated) statistics, including test for heterogeneity.Use displays such as funnel plot (minimum 10 studies) and Galbraith plot to visually present distribution of effect sizes or associations in order to evaluate small-study effects and publication bias).For meta-regression, the bubble plot is a useful display for assessing associations by study-level factors.Final checks on graphs, such as appropriate use of axis scale, line pattern, text size and graph resolution, should always be performed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27810865     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  7 in total

1.  Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert Suurmond; Henk van Rhee; Tony Hak
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 2.  Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean Lee Zheng; Fiona T Chan; Adam A Nabeebaccus; Ajay M Shah; Theresa McDonagh; Darlington O Okonko; Salma Ayis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis.

Authors:  Michael Kossmeier; Ulrich S Tran; Martin Voracek
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Effects of Clinical Pathways on Cesarean Sections in China: Length of Stay and Direct Hospitalization Cost Based on Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Controlled Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Dan Lin; Chunyang Zhang; Huijing Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  The efficacy and safety of combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kongju Wu; Ming Yi; Shuang Qin; Qian Chu; Xinhua Zheng; Kongming Wu
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-25

Review 6.  Rationale and tutorial for analysing and reporting sex differences in cardiovascular associations.

Authors:  Mark Woodward
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Association of corticosteroids use and outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haytham Tlayjeh; Olaa H Mhish; Mushira A Enani; Alya Alruwaili; Rana Tleyjeh; Lukman Thalib; Leslie Hassett; Yaseen M Arabi; Tarek Kashour; Imad M Tleyjeh
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.718

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.