Literature DB >> 27809376

An in vivo study of the orientation-dependent and independent components of transverse relaxation rates in white matter.

Rita Gil1,2, Diana Khabipova1,3, Marcel Zwiers1, Tom Hilbert4,5,6, Tobias Kober4,5,6, José P Marques1.   

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides information that allows the estimation of white-matter (WM) fibre orientation and distribution, but it does not provide information about myelin density, fibre concentration or fibre size within each voxel. On the other hand, quantitative relaxation contrasts (like the apparent transverse relaxation, R2∗) offer iron and myelin-related contrast, but their dependence on the orientation of microstructure with respect to the applied magnetic field, B0 , is often neglected. The aim of this work was to combine the fibre orientation information retrieved from the DWI acquisition and the sensitivity to microstructural information from quantitative relaxation parameters. The in vivo measured quantitative transverse relaxation maps (R2 and R2∗) were decomposed into their orientation-dependent and independent components, using the DWI fibre orientation information as prior knowledge. The analysis focused on major WM fibre bundles such as the forceps major (FMj), forceps minor (FMn), cingulum (CG) and corticospinal tracts (CST). The orientation-dependent R2 parameters, despite their small size (0-1.5 Hz), showed higher variability across different fibre populations, while those derived from R2∗, although larger (3.1-4.5 Hz), were mostly bundle-independent. With this article, we have, for the first time, attempted the in vivo characterization of the orientation-(in)dependent components of the transverse relaxation rates and demonstrated that the orientation of WM fibres influences both R2 and R2∗ contrasts.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  R2; R∗2; fibre orientation; white matter

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27809376     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  5 in total

1.  Magnetization transfer in magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Authors:  Tom Hilbert; Ding Xia; Kai Tobias Block; Zidan Yu; Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Tobias Kober; Martijn A Cloos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Biophysically motivated efficient estimation of the spatially isotropic R 2 * component from a single gradient-recalled echo measurement.

Authors:  Sebastian Papazoglou; Tobias Streubel; Mohammad Ashtarayeh; Kerrin J Pine; Luke J Edwards; Malte Brammerloh; Evgeniya Kirilina; Markus Morawski; Carsten Jäger; Stefan Geyer; Martina F Callaghan; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Siawoosh Mohammadi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Imaging white matter microstructure with gradient-echo phase imaging: Is ex vivo imaging with formalin-fixed tissue a good approximation of the in vivo brain?

Authors:  Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hédouin; Jeroen Mollink; Jenni Schulz; Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum; José P Marques
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Strong diffusion gradients allow the separation of intra- and extra-axonal gradient-echo signals in the human brain.

Authors:  Elena Kleban; Chantal M W Tax; Umesh S Rudrapatna; Derek K Jones; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 7.400

5.  Computing and visualising intra-voxel orientation-specific relaxation-diffusion features in the human brain.

Authors:  João P de Almeida Martins; Chantal M W Tax; Alexis Reymbaut; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Maxime Chamberland; Derek K Jones; Daniel Topgaard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.399

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.