Literature DB >> 27808547

Hazard versus history: Temporal preparation is driven by past experience.

Sander A Los1, Wouter Kruijne1, Martijn Meeter1.   

Abstract

The hazard function describes the conditional probability that an event will occur at a given moment, given that it has not yet occurred. In warned reaction time tasks, it is a classical finding that the response to a target stimulus is faster as its hazard is higher, which has led to the widespread belief that hazard somehow drives temporal preparation. Alternatively, recent cognitive theories propose that temporal preparation is driven by memory traces of earlier timing experiences. To distinguish between these views, we presented different groups of participants with different distributions of foreperiods between temporal cues and target stimuli. Three experiments revealed clear transfer effects of this manipulation in a test phase where all participants received, after explicit instruction, the same uniform distribution. These findings demonstrate that temporal preparation is driven by past experience, not by current hazard. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27808547     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  Timing a week later: The role of long-term memory in temporal preparation.

Authors:  Rozemarijn M Mattiesing; Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter; Sander A Los
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

2.  The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.

Authors:  Ciara A Devine; Christine Gaffney; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments.

Authors:  Stefanie Aufschnaiter; Andrea Kiesel; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-24

4.  Statistical learning of spatiotemporal regularities dynamically guides visual attention across space.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Xu; Jan Theeuwes; Sander A Los
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Noam Tal-Perry; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Pupillary fluctuation amplitude preceding target presentation is linked to the variable foreperiod effect on reaction time in Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks.

Authors:  Jumpei Yamashita; Hiroki Terashima; Makoto Yoneya; Kazushi Maruya; Haruo Oishi; Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Purpose-Dependent Consequences of Temporal Expectations Serving Perception and Action.

Authors:  Freek van Ede; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Ian Gould; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.

Authors:  André Mattes; Felice Tavera; Anja Ophey; Mandy Roheger; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-25

9.  Reward-associated distractors can harm cognitive performance.

Authors:  Dorottya Rusz; Erik Bijleveld; Michiel A J Kompier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Effect of Probabilistic Context on Implicit Temporal Expectations in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Giovanni Mento; Gaia Scerif; Umberto Granziol; Malida Franzoi; Silvia Lanfranchi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.