Literature DB >> 27807972

Sequence Determinants of the Conformational Properties of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Prior to and upon Multisite Phosphorylation.

Erik W Martin1, Alex S Holehouse2, Christy R Grace1, Alex Hughes1, Rohit V Pappu2, Tanja Mittag1.   

Abstract

Many cell signaling events are coordinated by intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs) that undergo multisite Serine/Threonine phosphorylation. The conformational properties of these IDRs prior to and following multisite phosphorylation are directly relevant to understanding their functions. Here, we present results from biophysical studies and molecular simulations that quantify the conformational properties of an 81-residue IDR from the S. cerevisiae transcription factor Ash1. We show that the unphosphorylated Ash1 IDR adopts coil-like conformations that are expanded and well-solvated. This result contradicts inferences regarding global compaction that are derived from heuristics based on amino acid compositions for IDRs with low proline contents. Upon phosphorylation at ten distinct sites, the global conformational properties of pAsh1 are indistinguishable from those of unphosphorylated Ash1. This insensitivity derives from compensatory changes to the pattern of local and long-range intrachain contacts. We show that the conformational properties of Ash1 and pAsh1 can be explained in terms of the linear sequence patterning of proline and charged residues vis-à-vis all other residues. The sequence features of the Ash1 IDR are shared by many other IDRs that undergo multisite phosphorylation. Accordingly, we propose that our findings might be generalizable to other IDRs involved in cell signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807972      PMCID: PMC5675102          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b10272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  64 in total

1.  Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch.

Authors:  Jeremy Gunawardena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor.

Authors:  Tanja Mittag; Stephen Orlicky; Wing-Yiu Choy; Xiaojing Tang; Hong Lin; Frank Sicheri; Lewis E Kay; Mike Tyers; Julie D Forman-Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phosphorylation of Sic1p by G1 Cdk required for its degradation and entry into S phase.

Authors:  R Verma; R S Annan; M J Huddleston; S A Carr; G Reynard; R J Deshaies
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Mixed mechanisms of multi-site phosphorylation.

Authors:  Thapanar Suwanmajo; J Krishnan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Turns in peptides and proteins.

Authors:  G D Rose; L M Gierasch; J A Smith
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1985

6.  (H)N(COCA)NH and HN(COCA)NH experiments for 1H-15N backbone assignments in 13C/15N-labeled proteins.

Authors:  C Bracken; A G Palmer; J Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Fast assignment of 15N-HSQC peaks using high-resolution 3D HNcocaNH experiments with non-uniform sampling.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu J Sun; Dominique P Frueh; Philipp Selenko; Jeffrey C Hoch; Gerhard Wagner
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 8.  Describing sequence-ensemble relationships for intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Albert H Mao; Nicholas Lyle; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Kusai A Merchant; Irina V Gopich; Benjamin Schuler; Ad Bax; William A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  D²P²: database of disordered protein predictions.

Authors:  Matt E Oates; Pedro Romero; Takashi Ishida; Mohamed Ghalwash; Marcin J Mizianty; Bin Xue; Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Vladimir N Uversky; Zoran Obradovic; Lukasz Kurgan; A Keith Dunker; Julian Gough
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  65 in total

1.  A Unified De Novo Approach for Predicting the Structures of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  John J Ferrie; E James Petersson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 2.  Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Commonly used FRET fluorophores promote collapse of an otherwise disordered protein.

Authors:  Joshua A Riback; Micayla A Bowman; Adam M Zmyslowski; Kevin W Plaxco; Patricia L Clark; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decoupling of size and shape fluctuations in heteropolymeric sequences reconciles discrepancies in SAXS vs. FRET measurements.

Authors:  Gustavo Fuertes; Niccolò Banterle; Kiersten M Ruff; Aritra Chowdhury; Davide Mercadante; Christine Koehler; Michael Kachala; Gemma Estrada Girona; Sigrid Milles; Ankur Mishra; Patrick R Onck; Frauke Gräter; Santiago Esteban-Martín; Rohit V Pappu; Dmitri I Svergun; Edward A Lemke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains.

Authors:  Erik W Martin; Alex S Holehouse; Ivan Peran; Mina Farag; J Jeremias Incicco; Anne Bremer; Christy R Grace; Andrea Soranno; Rohit V Pappu; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Revealing the Hidden Sensitivity of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to their Chemical Environment.

Authors:  David Moses; Feng Yu; Garrett M Ginell; Nora M Shamoon; Patrick S Koenig; Alex S Holehouse; Shahar Sukenik
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.475

7.  Properties of protein unfolded states suggest broad selection for expanded conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Micayla A Bowman; Joshua A Riback; Anabel Rodriguez; Hongyu Guo; Jun Li; Tobin R Sosnick; Patricia L Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Concerted millisecond timescale dynamics in the intrinsically disordered carboxyl terminus of γ-tubulin induced by mutation of a conserved tyrosine residue.

Authors:  Jason Harris; Maria Shadrina; Carlos Oliver; Jackie Vogel; Anthony Mittermaier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  Structural evaluations of tau protein conformation: methodologies and approaches.

Authors:  Nicole L Zabik; Matthew M Imhof; Sanela Martic-Milne
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.626

10.  Phase Separation of Toxic Dipeptide Repeat Proteins Related to C9orf72 ALS/FTD.

Authors:  Hamidreza Jafarinia; Erik van der Giessen; Patrick R Onck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.