| Literature DB >> 27807593 |
Fu Siong Ng1, Jeremy M Kalindjian2, Simon A Cooper2, Rasheda A Chowdhury2, Pravina M Patel2, Emmanuel Dupont2, Alexander R Lyon2, Nicholas S Peters2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of enhancing gap junction (GJ) coupling during acute myocardial infarction (MI) on the healed infarct scar morphology and late post-MI arrhythmia susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: CV, conduction velocity; Cx43, connexin43; GJ, gap junction; IBZ, infarct border zone; MI, myocardial infarction; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PES, programmed electrical stimulation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; electrophysiology; fibrosis; gap junctions; myocardial infarction; ventricular arrhythmia
Year: 2016 PMID: 27807593 PMCID: PMC5076465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol ISSN: 2405-500X
Figure 1Electrophysiological and Arrhythmia Determinants of Chronic MI Model
(A) Optical mapping of chronic MI hearts. (B) Representative optical action potentials from remote myocardium, IBZ, and infarct zone. (C) Slower CVs at IBZ compared with remote myocardium. (D) Conduction vector angles were more heterogeneous in the infarct zone (MI). (E) Prolonged rise times at the infarct zone and IBZ. (F) Increased dispersion of optical APDs at the infarct zone and IBZ. (C to F) n = 16 for MI hearts, and n = 4 for sham hearts. (G) IBZ CV was slower in PES(+) hearts (n = 8) than in PES(−) hearts (n = 8). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. APD = action potential duration; CV = conduction velocity; IBZ = infarct border zone; PES = programmed electrical stimulation.
Figure 2Reduced Arrhythmia Susceptibility on PES in Rotigaptide-Treated Hearts at 4 Weeks Post-MI
(A, Top) Example of VT/VF induced in a control (CON) heart during PES. (A, Bottom) Example of PES in a rotigaptide (ROT) heart, with no arrhythmias induced with 3 extrastimuli. (B) Proportions of hearts with VT/VF (duration >1 s) induced with PES. (C) Reduced arrhythmia inducibility scores for rotigaptide hearts (n = 9) compared with that of control MI hearts (n = 10) (*p < 0.05). Data from sham-operated hearts (n = 4) presented for comparison. +ve = PES positive; −ve = PES negative; MI = myocardial infarction; VT/VF = ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 3Improvement in IBZ CV in Rotigaptide-Treated Hearts
(A) Representative activation maps show conduction slowing at the IBZ of control and rotigaptide hearts and representative IBZ optical APs. (B) Increase in IBZ CV in rotigaptide-treated hearts (n = 9) compared with untreated control hearts (n = 26). (C and D) No differences in optical AP rise times and AP duration between groups.
Figure 4Reduced Heterogeneity of Fibrosis at IBZ of Rotigaptide-Treated Hearts
(A) Representative biventricular slices from the mid-ventricles of MI hearts stained with Masson’s trichrome. (B) No differences are seen in infarct size between groups. (C) Sample images of the IBZ from control and rotigaptide hearts show complex interaction between fibrosis (blue) and surviving myocardium (reddish-pink). (D) Mean IBZ ICRs were not different between groups. (E) Rotigaptide reduced the dispersion of ICR (SD of ICR values within each heart) compared to control MI hearts (*p < 0.05). (F) Cx43 lateralization scoring system. (Left) Normal Cx43 localization at the intercalated discs. (Right) Significant lateralization of Cx43 as shown by arrows. (G) Cx43 lateralization scores were not different between groups. CON n = 10; ROT n = 9. ICR = interface complexity ratio.