Literature DB >> 27807177

Integrating genomic signatures for treatment selection with Bayesian predictive failure time models.

Junsheng Ma1, Brian P Hobbs1, Francesco C Stingo2.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, a tremendous amount of resources have been dedicated to the pursuit of developing genomic signatures that effectively match patients with targeted therapies. Although dozens of therapies that target DNA mutations have been developed, the practice of studying single candidate genes has limited our understanding of cancer. Moreover, many studies of multiple-gene signatures have been conducted for the purpose of identifying prognostic risk cohorts, and thus are limited for selecting personalized treatments. Existing statistical methods for treatment selection often model treatment-by-covariate interactions that are difficult to specify, and require prohibitively large patient cohorts. In this article, we describe a Bayesian predictive failure time model for treatment selection that integrates multiple-gene signatures. Our approach relies on a heuristic measure of similarity that determines the extent to which historically treated patients contribute to the outcome prediction of new patients. The similarity measure, which can be obtained from existing clustering methods, imparts robustness to the underlying stochastic data structure, which enhances feasibility in the presence of small samples. Performance of the proposed method is evaluated in simulation studies, and its application is demonstrated through a study of lung squamous cell carcinoma. Our Bayesian predictive failure time approach is shown to effectively leverage genomic signatures to match patients to the therapies that are most beneficial for prolonging their survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; genomics; nonexchangeable; personalized medicine; time-to-failure endpoints; unsupervised clustering

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807177      PMCID: PMC5463529          DOI: 10.1177/0962280216675373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  35 in total

1.  Borrowing strength with nonexchangeable priors over subpopulations.

Authors:  L G Leon-Novelo; B Nebiyou Bekele; P Müller; F Quintana; K Wathen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Brian Claggett; Lu Tian; Eisuke Inoue; Paul Gallo; Toshio Miyata; Deborah Schrag; Masahiro Takeuchi; Yoshiaki Uyama; Lihui Zhao; Hicham Skali; Scott Solomon; Susanna Jacobus; Michael Hughes; Milton Packer; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognostic and predictive gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Chang-Qi Zhu; Keyue Ding; Dan Strumpf; Barbara A Weir; Matthew Meyerson; Nathan Pennell; Roman K Thomas; Katsuhiko Naoki; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Ni Liu; Melania Pintilie; Sandy Der; Lesley Seymour; Igor Jurisica; Frances A Shepherd; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  On optimal treatment regimes selection for mean survival time.

Authors:  Yuan Geng; Hao Helen Zhang; Wenbin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Gene expression profiling reveals reproducible human lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in multiple independent patient cohorts.

Authors:  D Neil Hayes; Stefano Monti; Giovanni Parmigiani; C Blake Gilks; Katsuhiko Naoki; Arindam Bhattacharjee; Mark A Socinski; Charles Perou; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Lessons learned from lung cancer genomics: the emerging concept of individualized diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Reinhard Buettner; Jürgen Wolf; Roman K Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Holly Janes; Ying Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba; J Jack Lee; George R Blumenschein; Anne Tsao; David J Stewart; Marshall E Hicks; Jeremy Erasmus; Sanjay Gupta; Christine M Alden; Suyu Liu; Ximing Tang; Fadlo R Khuri; Hai T Tran; Bruce E Johnson; John V Heymach; Li Mao; Frank Fossella; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Suzanne E Davis; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  The power prior: theory and applications.

Authors:  Joseph G Ibrahim; Ming-Hui Chen; Yeongjin Gwon; Fang Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  Machine learning demonstrates that somatic mutations imprint invariant morphologic features in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Yasunobu Nagata; Ran Zhao; Hassan Awada; Cassandra M Kerr; Inom Mirzaev; Sunisa Kongkiatkamon; Aziz Nazha; Hideki Makishima; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Jacob G Scott; Mikkael A Sekeres; Brian P Hobbs; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 25.476

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.