Shari R Waldstein1, Gregory A Dore, Christos Davatzikos, Leslie I Katzel, Rao Gullapalli, Stephen L Seliger, Theresa Kouo, William F Rosenberger, Guray Erus, Michele K Evans, Alan B Zonderman. 1. From the Department of Psychology (Waldstein), University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (Waldstein, Katzel), Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (Waldstein, Katzel), Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences (Dore, Evans, Zonderman), National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland; Section of Biomedical Image Analysis (Davatzikos, Erus), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Gullapalli, Kouo), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Nephrology (Seliger), Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Statistics (Rosenberger), George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine interactive relations of race and socioeconomic status (SES) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed global brain outcomes with previously demonstrated prognostic significance for stroke, dementia, and mortality. METHODS: Participants were 147 African Americans (AAs) and whites (ages 33-71 years; 43% AA; 56% female; 26% below poverty) in the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span SCAN substudy. Cranial MRI was conducted using a 3.0 T unit. White matter (WM) lesion volumes and total brain, gray matter, and WM volumes were computed. An SES composite was derived from education and poverty status. RESULTS: Significant interactions of race and SES were observed for WM lesion volume (b = 1.38; η = 0.036; p = .028), total brain (b = 86.72; η = 0.042; p < .001), gray matter (b = 40.16; η = 0.032; p = .003), and WM (b = 46.56; η = 0.050; p < .001). AA participants with low SES exhibited significantly greater WM lesion volumes than white participants with low SES. White participants with higher SES had greater brain volumes than all other groups (albeit within normal range). CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was associated with greater WM pathology-a marker for increased stroke risk-in AAs. Higher SES was associated with greater total brain volume-a putative global indicator of brain health and predictor of mortality-in whites. Findings may reflect environmental and interpersonal stressors encountered by AAs and those of lower SES and could relate to disproportionate rates of stroke, dementia, and mortality.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine interactive relations of race and socioeconomic status (SES) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed global brain outcomes with previously demonstrated prognostic significance for stroke, dementia, and mortality. METHODS:Participants were 147 African Americans (AAs) and whites (ages 33-71 years; 43% AA; 56% female; 26% below poverty) in the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span SCAN substudy. Cranial MRI was conducted using a 3.0 T unit. White matter (WM) lesion volumes and total brain, gray matter, and WM volumes were computed. An SES composite was derived from education and poverty status. RESULTS: Significant interactions of race and SES were observed for WM lesion volume (b = 1.38; η = 0.036; p = .028), total brain (b = 86.72; η = 0.042; p < .001), gray matter (b = 40.16; η = 0.032; p = .003), and WM (b = 46.56; η = 0.050; p < .001). AA participants with low SES exhibited significantly greater WM lesion volumes than white participants with low SES. White participants with higher SES had greater brain volumes than all other groups (albeit within normal range). CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was associated with greater WM pathology-a marker for increased stroke risk-in AAs. Higher SES was associated with greater total brain volume-a putative global indicator of brain health and predictor of mortality-in whites. Findings may reflect environmental and interpersonal stressors encountered by AAs and those of lower SES and could relate to disproportionate rates of stroke, dementia, and mortality.
Authors: Paul A Nyquist; Murat S Bilgel; Rebecca Gottesman; Lisa R Yanek; Taryn F Moy; Lewis C Becker; Jennifer Cuzzocreo; Jerry Prince; David M Yousem; Diane M Becker; Brian G Kral; Dhananjay Vaidya Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Niels D Prins; Tom den Heijer; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roger T Staff; Alison D Murray; Trevor S Ahearn; Nazahan Mustafa; Helen C Fox; Lawrence J Whalley Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jan Cees De Groot; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Van Gijn; Albert Hofman; Jellemer Jolles; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Zhiqiang Lao; Dinggang Shen; Dengfeng Liu; Abbas F Jawad; Elias R Melhem; Lenore J Launer; R Nick Bryan; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Danielle Shaked; Leslie I Katzel; Stephen L Seliger; Rao P Gullapalli; Christos Davatzikos; Guray Erus; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Fang-Chi Hsu; Kaycee M Sink; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Jeff D Williamson; Timothy M Hughes; Nicholette D Palmer; Jianzhao Xu; S Carrie Smith; Benjamin C Wagner; Christopher T Whitlow; Donald W Bowden; Joseph A Maldjian; Jasmin Divers; Barry I Freedman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Eseosa T Ighodaro; Peter T Nelson; Walter A Kukull; Frederick A Schmitt; Erin L Abner; Allison Caban-Holt; Shoshana H Bardach; Derrick C Hord; Crystal M Glover; Gregory A Jicha; Linda J Van Eldik; Alexander X Byrd; Anita Fernander Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Negar Fani; Nathaniel G Harnett; Bekh Bradley; Yara Mekawi; Abigail Powers; Jennifer S Stevens; Kerry J Ressler; Sierra E Carter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Even Hovig Fyllingen; Tor Ivar Hansen; Asgeir Store Jakola; Asta Kristine Håberg; Øyvind Salvesen; Ole Solheim Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Linda D Ruiz; Molly Brown; Yan Li; Elizabeth A Boots; Lisa L Barnes; Leonard Jason; Shannon Zenk; Philippa Clarke; Melissa Lamar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah A Keller; Kellia J Hansmann; W Ryan Powell; Barbara B Bendlin; Amy J H Kind Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: May A Beydoun; Danielle Shaked; Sharmin Hossain; Jordan Weiss; Hind A Beydoun; Ana I Maldonado; Leslie I Katzel; Christos Davatzikos; Rao P Gullapalli; Stephen L Seliger; Guray Erus; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 5.133