RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Brain lesions, especially white matter lesions (WMLs), are associated with cardiac and vascular disease, but also with normal aging. Quantitative analysis of WML in large clinical trials is becoming more and more important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this article, we present a computer-assisted WML segmentation method, based on local features extracted from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (ie, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, and fluid attenuation inversion recovery MRI scans). A support vector machine classifier is first trained on expert-defined WMLs, and is then used to classify new scans. RESULTS: Postprocessing analysis further reduces false positives by using anatomic knowledge and measures of distance from the training set. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-validation on a population of 35 patients from three different imaging sites with WMLs of varying sizes, shapes, and locations tests the robustness and accuracy of the proposed segmentation method, compared with the manual segmentation results from two experienced neuroradiologists.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Brain lesions, especially white matter lesions (WMLs), are associated with cardiac and vascular disease, but also with normal aging. Quantitative analysis of WML in large clinical trials is becoming more and more important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this article, we present a computer-assisted WML segmentation method, based on local features extracted from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (ie, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, and fluid attenuation inversion recovery MRI scans). A support vector machine classifier is first trained on expert-defined WMLs, and is then used to classify new scans. RESULTS: Postprocessing analysis further reduces false positives by using anatomic knowledge and measures of distance from the training set. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-validation on a population of 35 patients from three different imaging sites with WMLs of varying sizes, shapes, and locations tests the robustness and accuracy of the proposed segmentation method, compared with the manual segmentation results from two experienced neuroradiologists.
Authors: F B Mohamed; S Vinitski; C F Gonzalez; S H Faro; F A Lublin; R Knobler; J E Gutierrez Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Ying Wu; Simon K Warfield; I Leng Tan; William M Wells; Dominik S Meier; Ronald A van Schijndel; Frederik Barkhof; Charles R G Guttmann Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-06-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: W T Longstreth; T A Manolio; A Arnold; G L Burke; N Bryan; C A Jungreis; P L Enright; D O'Leary; L Fried Journal: Stroke Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Niels D Prins; Tom den Heijer; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jan Cees De Groot; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Van Gijn; Albert Hofman; Jellemer Jolles; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: C R Jack; P C O'Brien; D W Rettman; M M Shiung; Y Xu; R Muthupillai; A Manduca; R Avula; B J Erickson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lenore J Launer; Michael E Miller; Jeff D Williamson; Ron M Lazar; Hertzel C Gerstein; Anne M Murray; Mark Sullivan; Karen R Horowitz; Jingzhong Ding; Santica Marcovina; Laura C Lovato; James Lovato; Karen L Margolis; Patrick O'Connor; Edward W Lipkin; Joy Hirsch; Laura Coker; Joseph Maldjian; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Charles Truwit; Christos Davatzikos; R Nick Bryan Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Ilya Nasrallah; Tina D Hoang; Diane S Lauderdale; Kristen L Knutson; Mercedes R Carnethon; Lenore J Launer; Cora E Lewis; Stephen Sidney Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Mohamad Habes; Guray Erus; Jon B Toledo; Tianhao Zhang; Nick Bryan; Lenore J Launer; Yves Rosseel; Deborah Janowitz; Jimit Doshi; Sandra Van der Auwera; Bettina von Sarnowski; Katrin Hegenscheid; Norbert Hosten; Georg Homuth; Henry Völzke; Ulf Schminke; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Hans J Grabe; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Brain Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: James Y Chen; F Jacob Seagull; Paul Nagy; Paras Lakhani; Elias R Melhem; Eliot L Siegel; Nabile M Safdar Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: R Nick Bryan; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos; Ronald M Lazar; Anne Murray; Karen Horowitz; James Lovato; Michael E Miller; Jeff Williamson; Lenore J Launer Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Zoe Arvanitakis; Robin L Brey; Jacob H Rand; Julie A Schneider; Sue E Leurgans; Lei Yu; Aron S Buchman; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Debra A Fleischman; Patricia A Boyle; David A Bennett; Steven R Levine Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Joshua W Kirton; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos; Michael A Kraut; Vonetta M Dotson Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Harini Eavani; Mohamad Habes; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Yang An; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Nicolas Honnorat; Guray Erus; Jimit Doshi; Luigi Ferrucci; Lori L Beason-Held; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 4.673