Literature DB >> 2780560

Cell sorting-out is modulated by both the specificity and amount of different cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on cell surfaces.

D R Friedlander1, R M Mège, B A Cunningham, G M Edelman.   

Abstract

Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) are cell surface glycoproteins that may play a variety of roles in morphogenesis and histogenesis, particularly in defining borders of discrete cell populations. To examine the influence of CAM expression on such cell segregation events in vitro, we have transfected cells with cDNAs coding for two calcium-dependent CAMs of different specificity, the liver CAM (L-CAM) and the structurally related molecule N-cadherin. The cDNAs were introduced separately or together into murine sarcoma S180 cells, which normally do not express these molecules, to produce cell lines denoted S180L, S180cadN, and S180L/cadN, respectively. A number of cell lines of each type were produced that differed in their levels of CAM expression. In adhesion assays, S180L and S180cadN cells aggregated specifically via their respective CAMs, and S180L cells did not appear to adhere to S180cadN cells. Cells expressing high levels of each CAM aggregated more rapidly than cells expressing low levels. Segregation between two cell types occurred when they expressed CAMs of different specificity or different levels of the same CAM. S180L and S180cadN cells both sorted out from untransfected cells, and cells expressing high levels of either L-CAM or N-cadherin segregated from cells expressing low levels of the same CAM; in all cases segregation was inhibited by antibodies specific for the transfected CAM. S180L cells sorted out from S180cadN cells, but this segregation was inhibited only when antibodies to both CAMs were applied together. Doubly transfected S180L/cadN cells also sorted out from S180L cells and from S180cadN cells, and the process was inhibited by antibodies to the unshared CAM (N-cadherin or L-CAM, respectively). Cytochalasin D and nocodazole inhibited sorting-out, consistent with the probable role of microfilaments and microtubules in cell movement and in accord with evidence that the action of these CAMs depends on interactions with cortical cytoplasmic components. Using cDNAs for only two CAMs in these studies, we could distinguish at least eight cell lines by their behavior in sorting-out assays. This suggests that qualitative and quantitative differences in the expression in vivo of a relatively small number of CAMs can lead to a large variety of patterns among cell collectives and their borders during tissue formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2780560      PMCID: PMC297989          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.7043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Development of heterotypic combinations of dissociated embryonic chick cells.

Authors:  A MOSCONA
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1956-06

2.  DIFFERENTIATION IN CULTURE OF MIXED AGGREGATES OF DISSOCIATED TISSUE CELLS.

Authors:  J P Trinkaus; P W Groves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1955-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Morphoregulatory molecules.

Authors:  G M Edelman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-05-17       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems.

Authors:  A Nose; A Nagafuchi; M Takeichi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-09-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Kinetics of homophilic binding by embryonic and adult forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule.

Authors:  S Hoffman; G M Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cellular expression of liver and neural cell adhesion molecules after transfection with their cDNAs results in specific cell-cell binding.

Authors:  G M Edelman; B A Murray; R M Mege; B A Cunningham; W J Gallin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Construction of epithelioid sheets by transfection of mouse sarcoma cells with cDNAs for chicken cell adhesion molecules.

Authors:  R M Mege; F Matsuzaki; W J Gallin; J I Goldberg; B A Cunningham; G M Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding the liver cell adhesion molecule, L-CAM.

Authors:  W J Gallin; B C Sorkin; G M Edelman; B A Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cloning and expression of cDNA encoding a neural calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule: its identity in the cadherin gene family.

Authors:  K Hatta; A Nose; A Nagafuchi; M Takeichi
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Differential contributions of Ng-CAM and N-CAM to cell adhesion in different neural regions.

Authors:  S Hoffman; D R Friedlander; C M Chuong; M Grumet; G M Edelman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in segmental patterning.

Authors:  Q Xu; G Mellitzer; D G Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cadherin-dependent mechanotransduction depends on ligand identity but not affinity.

Authors:  Hamid Tabdili; Matthew Langer; Quanming Shi; Yeh-Chuin Poh; Ning Wang; Deborah Leckband
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Cadherins in maternal-foetal interactions: red queen with a green beard?

Authors:  Kyle Summers; Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Specificity of cell-cell adhesion by classical cadherins: Critical role for low-affinity dimerization through beta-strand swapping.

Authors:  Chien Peter Chen; Shoshana Posy; Avinoam Ben-Shaul; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry H Honig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Similarities between heterophilic and homophilic cadherin adhesion.

Authors:  A K Prakasam; V Maruthamuthu; D E Leckband
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of N-cadherin overexpression on the adhesion properties of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Zaruhi Karabekian; Nikki D Gillum; Elissa W P Wong; Narine Sarvazyan
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Tissue-specific roles for sonic hedgehog signaling in establishing thymus and parathyroid organ fate.

Authors:  Virginia E Bain; Julie Gordon; John D O'Neil; Isaias Ramos; Ellen R Richie; Nancy R Manley
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 8.  Synthetic morphology: prospects for engineered, self-constructing anatomies.

Authors:  Jamie A Davies
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Negative feedback from integrins to cadherins: a micromechanical study.

Authors:  Alia Al-Kilani; Olivier de Freitas; Sylvie Dufour; François Gallet
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Co-operative roles for E-cadherin and N-cadherin during lens vesicle separation and lens epithelial cell survival.

Authors:  Giuseppe F Pontoriero; April N Smith; Leigh-Anne D Miller; Glenn L Radice; Judith A West-Mays; Richard A Lang
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.