Literature DB >> 2780472

Transvenous pacemaker electrodes placed unintentionally in the left ventricle: three cases.

S J Winner1, N A Boon.   

Abstract

Three patients are described in whom pacemaker electrodes were unintentionally placed within the left ventricle, followed by considerable delay before the error was recognized. In two cases temporary pacemaker wires were inserted into the subclavian artery and passed along a retrograde course. One patient required urgent surgery for acute arterial obstruction on removal of the wire. In the third case, a permanent wire was inserted correctly into a vein but traversed the atrial septum, probably via a patent foramen ovale, to enter the left ventricle. Twelve lead electrocardiograms in all three patients showed paced complexes with right bundle branch block configuration. This appearance should raise suspicion that the pacemaker electrode might be in the left ventricle, in which case its position should be defined by chest radiographs (including a lateral view) and echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2780472      PMCID: PMC2429124          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.65.760.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

1.  Significance of right bundle-branch block patterns during pervenous ventricular pacing.

Authors:  S S Barold; O S Narula; R P Javier; J W Linhart; J W Lister; P Samet
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1969-05

2.  Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches.

Authors:  J I Sznajder; F R Zveibil; H Bitterman; P Weiner; S Bursztein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-02

Review 3.  Complications of permanent transvenous pacing.

Authors:  B Phibbs; H J Marriott
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-05-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts.

Authors:  P T Hagen; D G Scholz; W D Edwards
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Two-dimensional echocardiograms of a transvenous left ventricular pacing catheter.

Authors:  P L Judson; T B Moore; M Swank; H E Ashworth
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Unusual patterns of conduction produced by pacemaker stimuli.

Authors:  M M Mower; C E Aranaga; B Tabatznik
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Amaurosis fugax in a patient with a left ventricular endocardial pacemaker.

Authors:  W A Schiavone; L W Castle; E Salcedo; R Graor
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.976

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Management of inadvertent left ventricular permanent pacing.

Authors:  Kostas E Paravolidakis; Eftihia S Hamodraka; Theofilos M Kolettis; Stavroula N Psychari; Thomas S Apostolou
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Pacing lead inserted via the subclavian artery caused acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Peter Nordbeck; Heiner Langenfeld; Axel Krein; Wolfgang R Bauer; Oliver Ritter
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-02-11

3.  Sinus venosus atrial septal defect: a rare cause of misplacement of pacemaker leads.

Authors:  Malick Bodian; Fatou Aw; Mouhamadou Ndiaye Bamba; Adama Kane; Modou Jobe; Alioune Tabane; Alassane Mbaye; Simon Antoine Sarr; Maboury Diao; Moustapha Sarr; Serigne Abdou Bâ
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2013-07-05

4.  Shift From Left to a Right Bundle Block on ECG Leading to the Diagnosis of a Malpositioned Lead in the Coronary Sinus: A Case Report.

Authors:  Pramod Theetha Kariyanna; Yuvraj Singh Chowdhury; Amog Jayarangaiah; Jonathan Christopher Francois; Pakinam Mekki; Isabel M McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.