David Polidori1, Arjun Sanghvi2, Randy J Seeley3, Kevin D Hall4. 1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, California, USA. 2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. kevinh@niddk.nih.gov.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans. METHODS: A validated mathematical method was used to calculate energy intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated withcanagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion, thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. The relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes was analyzed using principles from engineering control theory. RESULTS: It was discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional increase in appetite resulting in eating above baseline by ∼100 kcal/day per kilogram of lost weight-an amount more than threefold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: While energy expenditure adaptations have often been considered the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans. METHODS: A validated mathematical method was used to calculate energy intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion, thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. The relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes was analyzed using principles from engineering control theory. RESULTS: It was discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional increase in appetite resulting in eating above baseline by ∼100 kcal/day per kilogram of lost weight-an amount more than threefold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: While energy expenditure adaptations have often been considered the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.
Authors: Paul S Maclean; Audrey Bergouignan; Marc-Andre Cornier; Matthew R Jackman Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Renate M Winkels; Angelique Jolink-Stoppelenburg; Kees de Graaf; Els Siebelink; Monica Mars; Lisette de Groot Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: S B Roberts; P Fuss; M B Heyman; W J Evans; R Tsay; H Rasmussen; M Fiatarone; J Cortiella; G E Dallal; V R Young Journal: JAMA Date: 1994 Nov 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marion J Franz; Jeffrey J VanWormer; A Lauren Crain; Jackie L Boucher; Trina Histon; William Caplan; Jill D Bowman; Nicolas P Pronk Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2007-10
Authors: Eva Almiron-Roig; Luigi Palla; Kathryn Guest; Cassandra Ricchiuti; Neil Vint; Susan A Jebb; Adam Drewnowski Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: George Thom; Stephan U Dombrowski; Naomi Brosnahan; Yasmin Y Algindan; M Rosario Lopez-Gonzalez; Giles Roditi; Michael E J Lean; Dalia Malkova Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Glen M DeLoid; Ikjot Singh Sohal; Laura R Lorente; Ramon M Molina; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Ana Stevanovic; Ruojie Zhang; David Julian McClements; Nicholas K Geitner; Douglas W Bousfield; Kee Woei Ng; Say Chye Joachim Loo; David C Bell; Joseph Brain; Philip Demokritou Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 15.881