Literature DB >> 26238786

Self-Reported Versus Performance-Based Assessments of a Simple Mobility Task Among Older Adults in the Emergency Department.

Kyle M Roedersheimer1, Greg F Pereira2, Christopher W Jones3, Valerie A Braz3, Sowmya A Mangipudi4, Timothy F Platts-Mills5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Accurate information about the mobility of independently living older adults is essential in determining whether they may be safely discharged home from the emergency department (ED). We assess the accuracy of self-reported ability to complete a simple mobility task among older ED patients.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of cognitively intact patients aged 65 years and older who were neither nursing home residents nor critically ill, conducted in 2 academic EDs. Consenting participants were asked whether they could get out of bed, walk 10 feet, turn around, and get back in bed without assistance, and if not, whether they could perform this task with a cane, walker, or assistance. Each participant was then asked to perform the task and was provided with a mobility device or assistance as needed.
RESULTS: Of 272 patients who met eligibility criteria and answered the physical task question, 161 (59%) said they could do the task unassisted, 45 (17%) said they could do it with a cane or walker, 21 (8%) said they could do it with assistance, and 45 (17%) said they would be unable to do it even with assistance. Among those who said they could do the task either with or without assistance and who were subsequently willing to attempt the task (N=172), discrepancies between self-reported ability and actual performance were common. Of those who said they could perform the task without assistance, 12% required some assistance or were unable to complete the task. Of those who said they could perform the task with a cane or walker, 48% required either assistance or were unable to perform the task. Of those who said they could perform the task with assistance, 24% were unable to perform the task even with assistance.
CONCLUSION: In this sample of older adults receiving care in the ED, the accuracy of their self-reported ability to perform a simple mobility task was poor, particularly for those who reported some need for assistance. For older adults being considered for discharge who report a need for assistance with mobility, direct observation of the patient's mobility by a member of the emergency care team should be considered.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238786      PMCID: PMC4724447          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  15 in total

1.  Profiles of older patients in the emergency department: findings from the interRAI Multinational Emergency Department Study.

Authors:  Leonard C Gray; Nancye M Peel; Andrew P Costa; Ellen Burkett; Aparajit B Dey; Palmi V Jonsson; Prabha Lakhan; Gunnar Ljunggren; Fredrik Sjostrand; Walter Swoboda; Nathalie I H Wellens; John Hirdes
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Research priorities for high-quality geriatric emergency care: medication management, screening, and prevention and functional assessment.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Kennon Heard; Scott Wilber; Adit A Ginde; Kirk Stiffler; Lowell W Gerson; Neal S Wenger; Douglas K Miller
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Measurement of activities of daily living in hospitalized elderly: a comparison of self-report and performance-based methods.

Authors:  M A Sager; N C Dunham; A Schwantes; L Mecum; K Halverson; D Harlowe
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Timed Up and Go test is not useful as a discharge risk screening tool.

Authors:  Katherine J Walker; Michael Bailey; Sally J Bradshaw; Peter Cameron; Linas Dziukas; Emma K Maguire; Catherine J Smith
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: effects of different data sources.

Authors:  L Z Rubenstein; C Schairer; G D Wieland; R Kane
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1984-11

6.  National trends in emergency department use, care patterns, and quality of care of older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Jesse M Pines; Peter M Mullins; James K Cooper; Lisa B Feng; Katalin E Roth
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  The underrecognized epidemic of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults.

Authors:  Cynthia J Brown; David T Redden; Kellie L Flood; Richard M Allman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.

Authors:  T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

9.  Functional assessment of older patients in the emergency department: comparison between standard instruments, medical records and physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero; María López-Diéguez; Ana I Tabuenca; Juan J de la Cruz; José R Banegas
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits.

Authors:  Lisa Calder; Anita Pozgay; Shena Riff; David Rothwell; Erik Youngson; Naghmeh Mojaverian; Adam Cwinn; Alan Forster
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  5 in total

1.  Willingness and Ability of Older Adults in the Emergency Department to Provide Clinical Information Using a Tablet Computer.

Authors:  Sruti Brahmandam; Wesley C Holland; Sowmya A Mangipudi; Valerie A Braz; Richard P Medlin; Katherine M Hunold; Christopher W Jones; Timothy F Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Limitations of SARC-F as a Screening Tool for Sarcopenia in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Keigo Imamura; Shohei Yamamoto; Yuta Suzuki; Ryota Matsuzawa; Manae Harada; Shun Yoshikoshi; Atsushi Yoshida; Atsuhiko Matsunaga
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Comparison of self-reported and performance-based measures of functional ability in elderly patients in an emergency department: implications for selection of clinical outcome measures.

Authors:  Louise M Nielsen; Hans Kirkegaard; Lisa G Østergaard; Karina Bovbjerg; Kasper Breinholt; Thomas Maribo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Validation of a proxy-reported SARC-F questionnaire for current and retrospective screening of sarcopenia-related functional impairments.

Authors:  Johannes Maurus; Tobias Terzer; Axel Benner; Sabine Goisser; Annette Eidam; Anja Roth; Maike Janssen; Sonia Jaramillo; Hannes Martin Lorenz; William Micol; Klaus Hauer; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Jürgen M Bauer; Karin Jordan; Nina Rosa Neuendorff
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 12.910

5.  A prediction model to identify hospitalised, older adults with reduced physical performance.

Authors:  Inge H Bruun; Thomas Maribo; Birgitte Nørgaard; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen; Christian B Mogensen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.921

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.