Kasper Pryds1,2, Roni Ranghøj Nielsen3, Camilla Molich Hoff4, Lars Poulsen Tolbod4, Kirsten Bouchelouche4, Jing Li5, Michael Rahbek Schmidt3, Andrew N Redington6, Jørgen Frøkiær4, Hans Erik Bøtker3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. kpryds@clin.au.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark. kpryds@clin.au.dk. 3. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark. 5. Division of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Center, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Heart Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) confers protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and may modulate coronary blood flow. We investigated whether RIC affects resting myocardial perfusion (MP) in patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease by quantitative MP imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 49 patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease. Resting MP was quantified by 82Rubidium positron emission tomography/computed tomography (82Rb-PET/CT) imaging before and after RIC, performed as four cycles of 5 minutes upper arm ischemia and reperfusion. Subsequent adenosine 82Rb-PET/CT stress-imaging identified non-ischemic and reversibly ischemic myocardial segments. MicroRNA-144 plasma levels were measured before and after RIC. Normalized for rate pressure product, RIC did not affect MP globally (P = .64) or in non-ischemic myocardial segments (P = .58) but decreased MP in reversibly ischemic myocardial segments (-0.11 mL/min/g decrease in MP following RIC; 95% CI -0.17 to -0.06, P < .001). However, we found no effect of RIC when MP was normalized for cardiac work. MicroRNA-144 plasma levels increased following RIC (P = .006) but did not correlate with a change in global MP in response to RIC (P = .40). CONCLUSIONS: RIC did not substantially affect resting MP globally or in non-ischemic and reversibly ischemic myocardial territories in patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) confers protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and may modulate coronary blood flow. We investigated whether RIC affects resting myocardial perfusion (MP) in patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease by quantitative MP imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 49 patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease. Resting MP was quantified by 82Rubidium positron emission tomography/computed tomography (82Rb-PET/CT) imaging before and after RIC, performed as four cycles of 5 minutes upper arm ischemia and reperfusion. Subsequent adenosine 82Rb-PET/CT stress-imaging identified non-ischemic and reversibly ischemic myocardial segments. MicroRNA-144 plasma levels were measured before and after RIC. Normalized for rate pressure product, RIC did not affect MP globally (P = .64) or in non-ischemic myocardial segments (P = .58) but decreased MP in reversibly ischemic myocardial segments (-0.11 mL/min/g decrease in MP following RIC; 95% CI -0.17 to -0.06, P < .001). However, we found no effect of RIC when MP was normalized for cardiac work. MicroRNA-144 plasma levels increased following RIC (P = .006) but did not correlate with a change in global MP in response to RIC (P = .40). CONCLUSIONS: RIC did not substantially affect resting MP globally or in non-ischemic and reversibly ischemic myocardial territories in patients with suspected ischemic coronary artery disease.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John O Prior; Gilles Allenbach; Ines Valenta; Marek Kosinski; Cyrill Burger; Francis R Verdun; Angelika Bischof Delaloye; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrew Van Tosh; John R Votaw; Nathaniel Reichek; Christopher J Palestro; Kenneth J Nichols Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jacob Johnsen; Kasper Pryds; Rasha Salman; Bo Løfgren; Steen Buus Kristiansen; Hans Erik Bøtker Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 17.165